Taylor expansion of an Ising-like Hamiltonian

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the Taylor expansion of an Ising-like Hamiltonian, specifically analyzing the partition function Z under conditions of zero and non-zero magnetic field (B). For B=0, the partition function simplifies to Z = [1+e-βA]N. When B is non-zero, the first-order approximation leads to Z = [1+e-βA]N - βB Σi=1N-1 nini+1 e-βAΣi=1N ni. The challenge lies in evaluating the sums, particularly in determining the contribution when ni = ni+1 = 1.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of statistical mechanics and partition functions
  • Familiarity with the Ising model and Hamiltonians
  • Knowledge of Taylor series expansions
  • Proficiency in mathematical notation and summation techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the evaluation of partition functions in statistical mechanics
  • Learn about the Ising model's applications in phase transitions
  • Study advanced summation techniques in statistical physics
  • Investigate the implications of non-zero magnetic fields in Ising models
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for physicists, particularly those specializing in statistical mechanics, researchers studying phase transitions, and students learning about the Ising model and its applications in condensed matter physics.

Silicon-Based
Messages
51
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Compute ##Z## and ##\log{Z}## of a set of ##N## two-level systems with total energy specified by the given Hamiltonian by Taylor expanding in powers of ##B## to first and second order.
Relevant Equations
$$H(\{n_i\}) = A\sum_{i=1}^{N}n_i + B\sum_{i=1}^{N-1}n_i n_{i+1}$$
##n_i = 0, 1## for ##i = 1, ..., N##
For the case when ##B=0## I get: $$Z = \sum_{n_i = 0,1} e^{-\beta H(\{n_i\})} = \sum_{n_i = 0,1} e^{-\beta A \sum_i^N n_i} =\prod_i^N \sum_{n_i = 0,1} e^{-\beta A n_i} = [1+e^{-\beta A}]^N$$
For non-zero ##B## to first order the best I can get is:
$$Z = \sum_{n_i = 0,1} e^{-\beta(A\sum_{i=1}^{N}n_i + B\sum_{i=1}^{N-1}n_i n_{i+1})} \approx \sum_{n_i = 0,1} e^{-\beta A\sum_{i=1}^{N}n_i} \left[1-\beta B \sum_{i=1}^{N-1}n_i n_{i+1} \right]$$ $$=
[1+e^{-\beta A}]^N - \beta B \sum_{n_i = 0,1} \sum_{i=1}^{N-1}n_i n_{i+1} e^{-\beta A\sum_{i=1}^{N}n_i}
$$ At this point I'm not sure how to evaluate the sums. Obiously, the only case when the sums yield a non-zero contribution is when ##n_i = n_{i+1} = 1##, but I don't know what ##e^{-\beta A\sum_{i=1}^{N}n_i}## evaluates to in that case. Should this just be ##-\beta B (N-1) e^{-\beta A N}##? That doesn't seem like the right answer since I can't really evaluate ##\log{Z}## then.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems like it would be easier to turn the sums in the arguments of the exponential into products of exponentials like you did in the ##B=## case. So you get
$$
Z = \prod_i \sum_{n_i = 0,1} \exp\left( - \beta A n_i - \beta B n_i n_{i+1} \right) \approx \prod_i \sum_{n_i = 0,1} \exp\left( - \beta A n_i \right) \left[ 1 - \beta B n_i n_{i+1} \right].
$$
Now the sum over ##n_i = 0,1## is straightforward, and the same idea applies to second-order in ##B##.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K