Taylor polynomial of 1/(2+x-2y)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Combinatus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polynomial Taylor
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding the Taylor polynomial of degree 3 for the function \(\frac{1}{2+x-2y}\) near the point (2,1). The original poster is exploring a substitution approach to derive the Taylor series using the Maclaurin expansion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to use a substitution \(u = x - 2y\) and apply the Maclaurin expansion for \(\frac{1}{2+u}\). They express curiosity about the validity of this method for multivariable functions and question the correctness of their results.

Discussion Status

Some participants engage with the original poster's approach, questioning the Maclaurin expansion results and discussing the equivalence of different methods for obtaining the Taylor polynomial. There is a recognition that both series expansions yield the same polynomial, indicating a productive exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes a focus on the potential for arithmetic errors in the original poster's calculations and the implications of using series expansions versus derivative evaluations in finding Taylor polynomials.

Combinatus
Messages
40
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Find the Taylor polynomial of degree 3 of [tex]\frac{1}{2+x-2y}[/tex] near (2,1).

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I have already solved this problem by evaluating the R^2 Taylor series; I'm mostly curious about another aspect of the problem.

By substituting u = x-2y, it would seem that we can use the Maclaurin expansion of [tex]g(u) = \frac{1}{2+u}[/tex], and then substitute back to the original variables (since f(x,y) ~= g(u) when (x,y) ~= (2,1)) to get the relevant Taylor series for f(x,y).

I seem to be getting the wrong answer with this approach, but I'm curious why this is the case. Does this approach work under certain conditions for multivariable functions, or should it work in general if a relevant substitution can be made, indicating that I've made an arithmetical error somewhere?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What did you get for your Maclaurin expansion for 1/(2 + u)? I think your approach might work, but I'm not sure of it. Keep in mind that you want to work with (1/2) *1/(1 + u/2).
 
It should work fine if you are doing it correctly.
 
Mark44 said:
What did you get for your Maclaurin expansion for 1/(2 + u)?
[tex]P_3(u) = \frac{1}{2} - \frac{1}{4}u + \frac{1}{8}u^2 - \frac{1}{16}u^3[/tex]

So, substituting u = x - 2y, we get

[tex]P_3(x-2y) = \frac{1}{2} - \frac{x-2y}{4} + \frac{(x-2y)^2}{8} - \frac{(x-2y)^3}{16}[/tex]...oh, nice, it does work out. I must have misplaced a sign somewhere when verifying the solution. The key to the problem states the third-degree Taylor polynomial of the initial function simply as

(1/2) - (1/4)*(x-2) + (1/2)*(y-1) + (1/8)*(x-2)^2 - (1/2)*(x-2)(y-1) + (1/2)*(y-1)^2 - (1/16)*(x-2)^3 + (3/8)*((x-2)^2)*(y-1) - (3/4)*(x-2)((y-1)^2) + (1/2)*((y-1)^3)), which equals what I obtained with the lengthy approach of evaluating the relevant partial derivatives. Wolframalpha seems to verify that the two polynomials are equal.

I'm not very comfortable with approaches that happen to work out that I don't really understand though.
 
Last edited:
The taylor series is an expansion of the function in powers of x and y. So is the expansion by series you did. It's not an accident they are equal. They are both doing the same thing. It's often easier to do it by series (if you can) than computing all of the high order derivatives.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K