Taylor polynomial of f(x) = 1/(1-x) and the estimate of its remainder

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Taylor polynomial for the function f(x) = 1/(1-x) of degree n = 5, centered around 0, is accurately represented as 1 + x + x² + x³ + x⁴ + x⁵. The Lagrange form of the remainder is calculated as R₅(x) = f⁶(a)/(6!)x⁶, with f⁶(a) = 720/(1-a)⁷. For the interval x in [-1/2, 1/2], the maximum upper bound for the remainder is determined to be less than 2. This estimate reflects the behavior of the polynomial near the singularity at x=1, indicating that the remainder estimate serves as a maximum upper bound rather than a precise value.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Taylor series and polynomial approximation
  • Familiarity with Lagrange form of the remainder
  • Knowledge of calculus, specifically derivatives and limits
  • Basic understanding of singularities in functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Taylor series for different functions
  • Learn about the implications of singularities on polynomial approximations
  • Explore the concept of error bounds in numerical analysis
  • Investigate alternative methods for estimating remainders in Taylor series
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, mathematicians focusing on approximation theory, and educators teaching Taylor series and polynomial approximations.

Ryker
Messages
1,080
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Find the Taylor polynomial for f(x) = 1/(1-x), n = 5, centered around 0. Give an estimate of its remainder.

The Attempt at a Solution


I found the polynomial to be 1 + x + x2 + x3 + x4 + x5, and then tried to take the Lagrange form of the remainder, say, for x in [-1/2, 1/2].

Then I get
R_{5}(x) = \frac{f^{6}(a)}{6!}x^{6}

But
f^{6}(a) = \frac{720}{(1-a)^{7}},
so for the largest values of a and x, that is 1/2, you get that
|R_{5}(x)| \leq \frac{(\frac{1}{2})^{6}}{(\frac{1}{2})^{7}} = 2,
which means the best estimate we can give is that the remainder is less than 2. But that doesn't make much sense to me, because the 5-th degree polynomial is fairly accurate on [-1/2, 1/2] and really close to f(x), so how I am getting such results? Have I made a mistake somewhere?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That looks fine to me. The remainder 'estimate' isn't really an estimate of the remainder. It's a maximum upper bound for the remainder. In this case it's a pretty pessimistic estimate, probably because you're nearing the singularity at x=1.
 
Hey, thanks for the reply. Yeah, I figured it's only the maximum upper bound, so should I have taken a smaller interval? I mean, we aren't really given any specific range, so I guess we can choose our own, it's just that I didn't want to choose one, smaller than [-1/2, 1/2]. Or am I right in thinking none of this really matters, as long as you show how you got to that estimate?
 
Ryker said:
Hey, thanks for the reply. Yeah, I figured it's only the maximum upper bound, so should I have taken a smaller interval? I mean, we aren't really given any specific range, so I guess we can choose our own, it's just that I didn't want to choose one, smaller than [-1/2, 1/2]. Or am I right in thinking none of this really matters, as long as you show how you got to that estimate?

I don't see anything wrong with what you've got. Maybe they just want the expression for R_5, not a specific number.
 
I put down both just in case anyway, so I guess I should be covered then :smile: Thanks again.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K