Taylor Series Expansion of f(x) at 0

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the Taylor Series Expansion of the function f(x) at 0, specifically addressing the computation of derivatives and the simplification of the series. The first derivative at zero is calculated as f'(0) = 1/3. Participants suggest using series expansions for sin(x) and cosh(x) to simplify the process, recommending polynomial multiplication and long division as effective methods. The discussion emphasizes the importance of differentiating the product of functions and solving for f'''(0) using the product rule.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Taylor Series and their applications
  • Familiarity with derivatives and differentiation techniques
  • Knowledge of series expansions for trigonometric and hyperbolic functions
  • Proficiency in polynomial multiplication and long division
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about Taylor Series for functions beyond f(x)
  • Study the product rule in calculus for higher-order derivatives
  • Explore series expansions for sin(x) and cosh(x) in detail
  • Investigate methods for simplifying complex derivatives in calculus
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, calculus students, and anyone interested in advanced techniques for deriving Taylor Series expansions and simplifying complex functions.

esrever10
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Expand the function ##f(x)=\sin x / (\cosh x + 2)## in a Taylor series around the origin going up to ##x^3##
Relevant Equations
##f(x)=f(a)+f^{(1)}(a)(x-a)+\frac{1}{2!}f(2)(a)(x-a)^2+...##
First I got ##f(0)=0##,

Then I got ##f'(x)(0)=\frac{\cos x(2+\cosh x)-\sin x\sinh x}{(2+\cosh x)^2}=1/3##

But when I tried to got ##f''(x)## and ##f'''(x)##, I felt that's terrible, If there's some easy way to get the anwser?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Please show your work.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: esrever10
Orodruin said:
Please show your work.
I don't get this, they showed us how they computed the first term of the series.

Esrever, a neat trick is you can write out the numerator and denominator as series, then apply ##\frac{1}{1-y}=1+y+y^2...## to the denominator where ##y## needs to be all the stuff that goes to zero. Then a bit of algebra on what's left gets you the solution.

This is not that much easier, but probably feels more fulfilling than computing tedious derivatives.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: esrever10, FactChecker and topsquark
Office_Shredder said:
I don't get this, they showed us how they computed the first term of the series.
If you look at the last edit time of the OP you will see that it is later than when I posted. The original OP did not include this.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: malawi_glenn
Orodruin said:
If you look at the last edit time of the OP you will see that it is later than when I posted. The original OP did not include this.

Sorry, my mistake for missing that.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: malawi_glenn
If you find the series for sin(x) and cosh(x) out to enough terms, then you can do regular multiplication and long division of polynomials.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: esrever10 and topsquark
You already have f(0) and f'(0). You (should) know that f''(0) = 0 because f is odd, so all you need is f'''(0). What you don't need is the general expression for f'''(x) in terms of x; an expression for f'''(0) in terms of f(0), f'(0) and f''(0) will suffice.

Start with <br /> (2 + \cosh x)f(x) = \sin x and differentiate both sides three times using the product rule: <br /> \sum_{n=0}^3 \binom{3}{n} f^{(n)}(x) \frac{d^{3-n}}{dx^{3-n}}(2 + \cosh x) = -\cos x. Now substitute x = 0 and solve for f&#039;&#039;&#039;(0).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: esrever10
I'd probably go with the method of post #3. I do find it simpler than brute forcing by computing the derivatives.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K