Taylor Series of the inverse tangent function

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the 2005th derivative of the function f(x) = tan^(-1)((1+x)/(1-x)) at x=0 using Taylor series. Participants clarify that f^{2005}(0) represents a specific number, not a function of x, and emphasize the importance of correctly identifying coefficients in the Taylor series expansion. They suggest starting with the simpler arctan(u) function to grasp the concept before tackling the more complex expression. The conversation also highlights the need to compare derivatives of arctan(u) and arctan((1+x)/(1-x)) to derive the correct formula. Ultimately, participants stress the importance of careful manipulation of the series and derivatives to arrive at the correct answer.
kudoushinichi88
Messages
125
Reaction score
2
I have a shaky understanding of problems concerning Taylor Series. For example, the question below.

Let f(x)=\tan^{-1}\left(\frac{1+x}{1-x}\right) where -\frac{1}{2}\leq x \leq \frac{1}{2}. Find the value of

f^{2005}(0)

the Taylor Series of \tan^{-1} is

\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^nx^{2n+1}}{2n+1}

my friend told me to set k=2n+1 and after an attempt to solve this, I got

f^{2005}(0)=\left(\frac{1+x}{x(1-x)}\right)^{2005}(2004!)

I'm not sure if I'm doing this right.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you have doesn't even make sense. The left side, f^{2005}(0), is a specific number, not a function of x.

Given that the Taylor's series for arctangent is
\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^nx^{2n+1}}{2n+1}
you can then replace that x with (1+ x)/(x(1- x)) but then you have to expand that to get a power series and determine n so that x has power 2005.

f^{2005}(0) is the coefficient not entire term.
 
May I add something too please? I would suggest he first solve the problem for just arctan(u), just that one, say for the fourth or fifth or like me, the seventh derivative. Get that straight, then go for the other one. So:

f(u)=\arctan(u)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{f^{(n)}(0)}{n!} u^n=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^n u^{2n+1}}{2n+1}

See, that's already a good start. Then that means:

\frac{f^{(2n+1)}(0)}{(2n+1)!}=\frac{(-1)^n}{2n+1}

or:

f^{(2n+1)}(0)=(-1)^n \frac{(2n+1)!}{2n+1}

Now, here's the very important part I wish to emphasize: check that in Mathematica, say for the seventh derivative. Then in that case, n=3 right? so:

Code:
In[18]:=
D[ArcTan[x], {x, 7}] /. x -> 0
N[((-1)^3/7)*7!]

Out[18]=
-720

Out[19]=
-720.

Now, here's a hint to solve your problem, take:

\frac{d}{du} \arctan(u)

and:

\frac{d}{dx}\arctan(\frac{1+x}{1-x})

What do you notice about the two derivatives and then all the other higher order derivatives?
 
So... subbing \frac{1+x}{1-x} into,

<br /> \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^nx^{2n+1}}{2n+1}<br />

I have

<br /> \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^n\left(\frac{1+x}{1-x}\right)^{2n+1}}{2n+1}<br />,

By setting 2n+1=2005, and comparing with the general representation of a taylor series,

<br /> \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{f^n(a)}{n!}(x-a)^n<br />

I finally got

\frac{1002!}{2005}

Is this correct?
 
No, that's not correct. I would strongly recommend you consider jackmell's hint about comparing the first derivatives of those two functions.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K