Teaching the Penetrating Powers of Radiation: Alpha, Beta, and Gamma

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the penetrating abilities of different types of radiation—alpha, beta, and gamma—within the context of nuclear technology. Participants explore the reasons behind the varying levels of penetration and the implications of food irradiation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the charge and mass differences between alpha, beta, and gamma particles, and how these factors influence their interactions with matter. Questions arise about the nature of beta particles, particularly regarding their charges and decay processes. The original poster also inquires about the non-radioactive nature of irradiated food and whether alpha particles can induce radioactivity in materials they interact with.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide insights into the mechanisms of radiation interaction, such as ionization and the effects of gamma rays. There is ongoing exploration of the differences between beta particles, with references to decay processes. The discussion remains open with various interpretations and clarifications being sought.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the absence of radiation sources for teaching purposes, which may limit practical demonstrations of the concepts discussed.

pavadrin
Messages
154
Reaction score
0
Hey
Recently I have been studied for a physics test on Nuclear Technology. A question I came across asked me to explain the difference between the penetrating ability of the three different types of radiation, alpha, beta and gamma and explain why. I know that gamma has the highest penetrating ability and alpha the smallest, but I do not know the reasons behind this. Also, how come when food becomes irradiated it does not become radioactive? Alpha particles are stopped by a piece of paper. Would this piece of paper become radioactive? Why or why not?
Many thanks,
Pavadrin
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The alpha particle has a 2+ charge, beta has 1- charge, and the gamma is neutral (no charge). All three particles primarily interact with atomic electrons in the matter through which they pass, and they ionize those atoms. Also the alpha is massive compared to the beta and gamma, and the beta is more massive than the gamma, so more momentum is transferred from the heavier particles to atoms encountered along the path.

The interaction is strongest for the alpha particle with the 2+ charge, and weakest for the gamma with no charge.

Electrons can interact by the brehmsstrahlung (braking radition) reaction when they interact with the nuclear electric field.

Gamma rays can be absorbed (photoelectric effect or pair production) or scattered (Compton effect). In the photoelectric effect, the gamma interacts with an atomic electron an is completely absorbed. In pair production, the gamma interacts with the nucleus and forms a positron-electron pair. The threshold for pair production is 1.022 MeV or twice the rest mass of the electron.

Food irradiation is usually accomplished with gamma radiation, so the food atoms/molecules are only ionized. The nuclei of the food molelcules are not affect, i.e. no radioactivity is induced.

Activation (making something radioactive) requires the use of neutrons which interact (are absorbed) by nuclei, which increases the nuclear mass by 1 amu, and the resulting nuclei then decay by beta decay. Some nuclei, like B-10 experience alpha decay upon absorption of a neutron, otherwise alpha decay occurs in heavier nuclear starting with isotopes of Bi-211, although Po has several lighter isotopes, which undergo alpha decay.

For future reference - http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/nudat2/
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Marcy
thank for your help Astronuc, greatly appricated
 
in my book its speaks of a beta particle having a 1+ charge and a 1- charge. What is the difference between these beta particles? I know that the 1- charge particle is the deacy of a neutron into a proton and an electron, but as for the other one, it is not explanied in the book.
many thanks
 
pavadrin said:
in my book its speaks of a beta particle having a 1+ charge and a 1- charge. What is the difference between these beta particles? I know that the 1- charge particle is the deacy of a neutron into a proton and an electron, but as for the other one, it is not explanied in the book.
many thanks
Beta radiation is made of electron or its antiparticle, the positron. (you know that there is beta decay as well as inverse beta decay).
So when they give a charge of +e, they are referring to the positron.
 
Just further to what nrqed said a couple of examples of beta decay;

Beta+ Decay:
p \rightarrow n + \upsilon_{e} + e^{+}

Beta- Decay;
n \rightarrow p + \overline{\upsilon_{e}} + e^{-}

I was going to draw Feynman diagrams but then I realized PF doesn't support them in latex :cry:
 
Hootenanny said:
Just further to what nrqed said a couple of examples of beta decay;

Beta+ Decay:
p \rightarrow n + \upsilon_{e} + e^{+}

Beta- Decay;
n \rightarrow p + \overline{\upsilon_{e}} + e^{-}

I was going to draw Feynman diagrams but then I realized PF doesn't support them in latex :cry:
Hi Hoot.

How does one draw Feynman diagrams directly in Latex?
It must involve some extra package, Any link to the package/tutorial?

Thanks

Patrick
 
nrqed said:
Hi Hoot.

How does one draw Feynman diagrams directly in Latex?
It must involve some extra package, Any link to the package/tutorial?

Thanks

Patrick
Hey Patrick,

Yes, there is although I've only just started playing with it, it doesn't seem to be fully operational yet . I'm going to ask in the Latex tutorial if someone can help me out. Anyway the package is called feynmf and is located here http://tug.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/feynmf/
 
Any ideas on how to teach the penetrating powers of alpha, beta and gamma radiation in the absenc of radiation sources?
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
713
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K