MHB Technical problem with eigenvalues

  • Thread starter Thread starter Yankel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenvalues
Yankel
Messages
390
Reaction score
0
Hello

I was trying to find eigenvalues of a matrix. I calculated the characteristic polynomial by calculating (A-lambdaI) and then calculating it's determinant. The results was:

-\lambda ^{3}+8\lambda ^{2}-20\lambda +16

which is the correct calculation.

Now, the eigenvalues are 2,2,4, but I do not know, technically, how am I suppose to find it from:

-\lambda ^{3}+8\lambda ^{2}-20\lambda +16 = 0

I mean, how do I expand this polynomial into:

(\lambda -4)(\lambda -2)^{2}

assuming that I do not see it in my eyes immediately, is there some hint to look for ?

Just to supply all information, the matrix is:

\begin{pmatrix} 3 &2 &3 \\ -1 &0 &-3 \\ 1 &2 &5 \end{pmatrix}thanks !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The first place to look would be the Rational Root Theorem. Then, once you get one root, you can perform polynomial long division or synthetic division to obtain a quadratic times the linear factor you just discovered.
 
Sometimes (this is the case) we can get factorized the characteristc polynomial with adequate transformations. For example, $R_3+R_2$ and $C_2-C_3$ provide:

$$\begin{aligned}\begin{vmatrix}{3-\lambda}&{2}&{3}\\{-1}&{-\lambda}&{-3}\\{1}&{2}&{5-\lambda}\end{vmatrix}&=\begin{vmatrix}{3-\lambda}&{2}&{3}\\{-1}&{-\lambda}&{-3}\\{0}&{2-\lambda}&{2-\lambda}\end{vmatrix}\\ &=\begin{vmatrix}{3-\lambda}&{-1}&{3}\\{-1}&{-\lambda+3}&{-3}\\{0}&{0}&{2-\lambda}\end{vmatrix}\\&=(2-\lambda)(\lambda^2-6\lambda+8)\\&=-(\lambda-2)^2(\lambda-4)\end{aligned}$$
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K