Temperature: Absolute infinity

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concept of whether there is an absolute highest temperature, drawing parallels to absolute zero. Participants explore the implications of relativity on temperature, energy, and the limits imposed by physical laws.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the concept of a highest temperature could be analogous to absolute zero, questioning if it is a direct consequence of Einstein's relativity.
  • There is a discussion about the constraints of speed and energy, with some arguing that while speed is limited by the speed of light, energy does not have a similar upper limit.
  • One participant proposes that the maximum possible temperature could be defined as the kinetic energy of a particle when all other particles are at absolute zero.
  • Another participant raises the idea that if the kinetic energy of hydrogen gas were sufficiently high, it could lead to protons colliding and potentially reaching a maximum temperature.
  • Some participants mention the implications of general relativity (GR) on energy density, suggesting that there are limits to energy density that could lead to black hole formation.
  • There is a challenge regarding the definition of energy density and the relationship between energy and black hole formation, with differing views on the criteria for becoming a black hole.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between speed, energy, and temperature, with no consensus reached on the existence or nature of an absolute highest temperature.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various physical concepts, including special relativity (SR) and general relativity (GR), but the discussion remains unresolved regarding the definitions and implications of these concepts in relation to temperature.

Mephisto
Messages
93
Reaction score
0
I heard somewhere that it is a matter of debate whether or not there is an absolutely highest temperature, analogous to absolute zero. This puzzled me because I thought that this is a direct consequence of Einstein's relativity:

Temperature is average kinetic energy of a substance. But since the particles in the substance are limited by the highest speed, the speed of light, doesn't it make sense that your substance has to have a theoretical limit defined by this constraint?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Nice link montoyas.

What you have to ask Mephisto is "what is the highest velocity given these constriants"

It's the "given these constraints" bit that usually tie people up. If you constrain the construct to traveling at less than or equal to light speed, then perhaps. But ask yourself this. If such a construct falls into a White Hole and pops out on the far side of the Universe, what was it's speed? Was it the relative speed of the item, or the Lorentzian equivalent of the time it would take for the object to arrive there?

(Personal note: I'm not sure that should you fall into such a wormhole and traverse 100 million light years in an instant that you and your ship would not arrive their instantaneously, but 100 million years old. Bad for the passengers, awesome find for the archeologists...)
 
The thing that matters is not speed, but energy. While SR does put an upper limit on an object's speed, it places no such limit on its energy.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
The thing that matters is not speed, but energy. While SR does put an upper limit on an object's speed, it places no such limit on its energy.

Other than it can't have more than all the energy in the universe.
So it can't have unlimited energy.

right?

So, would the maximum possible temperature be the kinetic energy of a particle when all other particles in the universe are at absolute zero?

Just spitballing.
 
What's the binding energy of a proton? If the kinetic energy of your hydrogen gas was so large that all the protons smashed each other into bits, leaving only radiation, that could be the maximum temperature :)
 
While SR does put an upper limit on an object's speed, it places no such limit on its energy.

But GR does place a limit on energy density, since if this is too large a black hole will be formed. I believe there is an upper limit like 10^60 horsepower :)
 
confinement said:
But GR does place a limit on energy density, since if this is too large a black hole will be formed. I believe there is an upper limit like 10^60 horsepower :)

No, it doesn't. An object doesn't become a black hole by switching frames. Also, horsepower is not a unit of energy density.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
15K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
4K