Tension problem- why doesn't this solution work?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lola Luck
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tension Work
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a tension problem involving cords supporting a weight, where the original poster seeks to find the tension in each cord using the sine and cosine laws. The context is centered on understanding the equilibrium of forces acting on the suspended object.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply the sine law and cosine law to find the tensions in the cords but questions the validity of their approach when the results do not match expected answers. Participants raise questions about the horizontal and vertical force components at the junction of the cords and discuss the appropriateness of using the law of sines in this context.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different interpretations of the problem, particularly regarding the application of the law of sines versus resolving forces into components. Some guidance has been provided regarding the nature of the forces and the relationships between the tensions, but no consensus has been reached on the method of solution.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the assumptions made in applying the law of sines to tensions, as well as the need to consider the vector nature of forces in equilibrium. The original poster expresses confusion about the setup of the problem and the application of triangular rules to the magnitudes of the forces.

Lola Luck
Messages
26
Reaction score
1
1. Find the tension in each cord if the weight of the suspended object is w. (I am only asking about part a)

roxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fsession.masteringphysics.com%2FproblemAsset%2F1038549%2F5%2FYF-05-44.jpg

2. Net force on an object in equilibrium = 0

3. part a) I know this isn't the typical solution for this type of problem but I don't understand why it's not working.

I used the sine law: (Ta)/(sin45) = (Tb)/(sin30)
Then cosine law: w2 = (Ta)2 + (Tb)2 - 2(Ta)(Tb)cos75

I combined the equations to solve for Tb in terms of w. The answer I get doesn't match the given answer, so I'm wondering if there is something wrong with how I set up the problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The law of sines could help you to determine the length of cords A and B. But that is not what you are after. You want to know the tension in cords A and B.

What horizontal force components exist at the junction point between A, B and C?
What vertical force components exist at the junction point?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lola Luck
jbriggs444 said:
The law of sines could help you to determine the length of cords A and B. But that is not what you are after. You want to know the tension in cords A and B.

What horizontal force components exist at the junction point between A, B and C?
What vertical force components exist at the junction point?

I'm not sure I understand why the law of sines can't be used on forces (tension in this case).

I believe I understand how to do it with components: (Tay) + (Tby) = -w and (Tax) + (Tbx) = 0
 
Right. ##T_{ax} + T_{bx} = 0##. But that does not involve the law of sines.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lola Luck
Yeah. I can solve it that way, but I don't understand why it would be incorrect to use the law of sines.
 
See the first response above. The law of sines tells you something about the length of the cords, not their tensions.

But ignore that. Let us assume that the law of sines worked as you state, i.e

##\frac{t_a}{sin 30} = \frac{t_b}{sin 45}## Which means that ##\frac{t_a}{t_b} = \frac{sin 30}{sin 45}## That's approximately 0.35.

But we also know that

##t_a cos 30 = t_b cos 45## Which means that ##\frac{t_a}{t_b} = \frac{cos 45}{cos 30}## That's approximately 0.82

They cannot both be right.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lola Luck
I understand now. The vectors weren't in an additive form (tip to tail) so it was wrong to apply triangular rules to their magnitudes. Thank you for helping me!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K