Tensor Algebra: Checking {u^i} = {g^{kj}} A _{kj}^i

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around tensor algebra, specifically focusing on the equation {u^i} = {g^{kj}} A _{kj}^i and its modifications. Participants are examining the implications of tensor contractions and the proper handling of indices in the context of metric tensors.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to modify the original equation and are questioning whether metric contractions are necessary. There is discussion about the implications of summing over indices and the introduction of factors like V, the dimension of the space.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the correct handling of indices and the necessity of maintaining clarity in tensor operations. There is an ongoing exploration of the steps taken in the problem-solving process, with some participants identifying potential errors in reasoning.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through the complexities of tensor algebra, including the use of dummy indices and the rules governing metric tensors. There is a recognition of the importance of maintaining distinct indices to avoid confusion in calculations.

redstone
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[tex]{u^i} = {g^{kj}} A _{kj}^i[/tex]
just trying to modify it, not sure of my tensor algebra. Is this right?

[tex]{u^i} = {g^{kj}} A _{kj}^i[/tex]
[tex]{u^i} = g_a^j{g^{ka}} A _{kj}^i[/tex]
[tex]g_j^a{u^i} = {g^{ka}} A _{kj}^i[/tex]

Just not sure if there should have been a metric contraction, with the resulting D factor in there somewhere.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The 3rd equation is wrong in the sense that it doesn't imply the 2nd. In the 2nd equation both a and j are summed over, so to get there you need to sum/contract the 3rd one with [itex]g_{a}^{j}[/itex]. When doing that, the RHS becomes the RHS from the 2nd equation, while in the first appears the term [itex]\delta_{j}^{j}[/itex] which is V, the dimension of the tangent/cotangent space.
 
Ah, yes, I think I see. That does give me a missing V factor. So would you consider this correct then:


[tex]{u^i} = {g^{kj}} A _{kj}^i[/tex]
[tex]{u^i} = g_a^j{g^{ka}} A _{kj}^i[/tex]
[tex]\frac{g_j^a{u^i}}{V} = {g^{ka}} A _{kj}^i[/tex]

where,
[tex]V=g_j^j=\delta_j^j[/tex]

Which when run in reverse...
[tex]\frac{g_j^a{u^i}}{V} = {g^{ka}} A _{kj}^i[/tex]
[tex]\frac{g_a^j g_j^a{u^i}}{V} = g_a^j {g^{ka}} A _{kj}^i[/tex]
[tex]\frac{\delta_j^j {u^i}}{V} = g_a^j {g^{ka}} A _{kj}^i[/tex]
[tex]\frac{\delta_j^j {u^i}}{V} = {g^{kj}} A _{kj}^i[/tex]
[tex]\frac{V {u^i}}{V} = {g^{kj}} A _{kj}^i[/tex]
[tex]{u^i} = {g^{kj}} A _{kj}^i[/tex]

So I guess the rule is that whenever you move that mixed metric to the other side, you swap indices, and put in that V factor.

Unless I did something wrong here that needs to be corrected, thanks for the help!
 
Yes, it's correct. Just pay attention with the indices, so you don't end up with more than 2 appearances of the same index on the same side of an equality.
 
Maybe you can help me with the following. I I'm pretty sure the final answer I get is wrong, but every step I took looks reasonable to me. Do you know which step I did something illegal on?

Start: [tex]A={{g}_{ij}}{{x}^{i}}{{x}^{j}}\][/tex]

Step 1: [tex]A=g_{i}^{a}g_{j}^{b}{{g}_{ab}}{{x}^{i}}{{x}^{j}}[/tex]

Step 2: [tex]\frac{1}{V}\frac{1}{V}g_{a}^{i}g_{b}^{j}A={{g}_{ab}}{{x}^{i}}{{x}^{j}}[/tex]

Step 3: [tex]\frac{1}{V}\frac{1}{V}{{g}^{ab}}g_{a}^{i}g_{b}^{j}A={{g}^{ab}}{{g}_{ab}}{{x}^{i}}{{x}^{j}}[/tex]

Step 4: [tex]\frac{1}{V}\frac{1}{V}{{g}^{ab}}g_{a}^{i}g_{b}^{j}A=V{{x}^{i}}{{x}^{j}}[/tex]

Step 5: [tex]\frac{1}{V}\frac{1}{V}\frac{1}{V}{{g}^{ij}}A={{x}^{i}}{{x}^{j}}[/tex]

I believe the correct answer is:
[tex]\frac{1}{V}{{g}^{ij}}A={{x}^{i}}{{x}^{j}}[/tex]

but I'd like to know where I went wrong above.
 
redstone said:
Maybe you can help me with the following. I I'm pretty sure the final answer I get is wrong, but every step I took looks reasonable to me. Do you know which step I did something illegal on?

Start: [tex]A={{g}_{ij}}{{x}^{i}}{{x}^{j}}\][/tex]

Step 1: [tex]A=g_{i}^{a}g_{j}^{b}{{g}_{ab}}{{x}^{i}}{{x}^{j}}[/tex]

Step 2: [tex]\frac{1}{V}\frac{1}{V}g_{a}^{i}g_{b}^{j}A={{g}_{ab}}{{x}^{i}}{{x}^{j}}[/tex]

Step 2 is incorrect. In the expression for step 1, you're summing over all indices, so there's no operation that brings factors of the metric over to the LHS. If you can't reduce a step to multiplying left and right-hand sides of an equation by the same factor, chances are that you did something wrong.
 
fzero said:
Step 2 is incorrect. In the expression for step 1, you're summing over all indices, so there's no operation that brings factors of the metric over to the LHS. If you can't reduce a step to multiplying left and right-hand sides of an equation by the same factor, chances are that you did something wrong.

I left out the steps going between step 1 and step 2, but that's what I thought I did. Here are the steps I had.

Step 1: [tex]A=g_{i}^{a}g_{j}^{b}{{g}_{ab}}{{x}^{i}}{{x}^{j}}[/tex]
Step 1a: [tex]\frac{V}{V}A=g_{i}^{a}g_{j}^{b}{{g}_{ab}}{{x}^{i}}{{x}^{j}}[/tex]
Step 1b: [tex]\frac{1}{V}g_{a}^{a}A=g_{i}^{a}g_{j}^{b}{{g}_{ab}}{{x}^{i}}{{x}^{j}}[/tex]
Step 1c: [tex]\frac{1}{V}g_{i}^{a}g_{a}^{i}A=g_{i}^{a}g_{j}^{b}{{g}_{ab}}{{x}^{i}}{{x}^{j}}[/tex]
Step 1d: [tex]\frac{1}{V}g_{a}^{i}A=g_{j}^{b}{{g}_{ab}}{{x}^{i}}{{x}^{j}}[/tex]

Step 1e: [tex]\frac{1}{V}\frac{1}{V}g_{b}^{b}g_{a}^{i}A=g_{j}^{b}{{g}_{ab}}{{x}^{i}}{{x}^{j}}[/tex]
Step 1f: [tex]\frac{1}{V}\frac{1}{V}g_{b}^{j}g_{j}^{b}g_{a}^{i}A=g_{j}^{b}{{g}_{ab}}{{x}^{i}}{{x}^{j}}[/tex]
Step 2: [tex]\frac{1}{V}\frac{1}{V}g_{a}^{i}g_{b}^{j}A={{g}_{ab}}{{x}^{i}}{{x}^{j}}[/tex]

Is one of these steps illegal?
 
redstone said:
I left out the steps going between step 1 and step 2, but that's what I thought I did. Here are the steps I had.

Step 1: [tex]A=g_{i}^{a}g_{j}^{b}{{g}_{ab}}{{x}^{i}}{{x}^{j}}[/tex]
Step 1a: [tex]\frac{V}{V}A=g_{i}^{a}g_{j}^{b}{{g}_{ab}}{{x}^{i}}{{x}^{j}}[/tex]
Step 1b: [tex]\frac{1}{V}g_{a}^{a}A=g_{i}^{a}g_{j}^{b}{{g}_{ab}}{{x}^{i}}{{x}^{j}}[/tex]

You already have an index [tex]a[/tex] on the RHS that's being summed over, so you shouldn't use the same index in the sum on the LHS. That's the source of your confusion. You should write:

[tex]\frac{1}{V}g_{c}^{c}A=g_{i}^{a}g_{j}^{b}{{g}_{ab}}{{x}^{i}}{{x}^{j}}[/tex]

and then it's clear that you can't cancel [tex]g[/tex]'s out on both sides.

You make the same mistake in some of the other steps. Just never use the same dummy index twice and it'll cut down on mistakes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
13K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
11K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K