High School Tensor Conventions: V^*⊗V^*⊗V (1,2) vs (2,1)

  • Thread starter Thread starter fresh_42
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Convention Tensor
Click For Summary
In the discussion on tensor conventions, the tensor V^*⊗V^*⊗V is identified as (1,2), indicating one index in V and two in its dual. The terms contravariant and covariant are applied to the components of the tensor, with the contravariant index represented as T^a_{bc}, where 'a' is contravariant and 'b', 'c' are covariant. Participants clarify that the distinction lies in how components transform during coordinate changes rather than the tensor's inherent properties. The conversation highlights the difference in terminology usage between mathematicians and physicists regarding these transformations. Understanding this distinction is crucial for accurately interpreting tensor behavior in physics.
fresh_42
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
2024 Award
Messages
20,815
Reaction score
28,448
How do physicists call a tensor of ## V^* \otimes V^* \otimes V##, (1,2) or (2,1)?
And which part do they call contravariant and which covariant?

I'm just not sure, whether the mathematical definition of funktors apply to the usances in physics.
(LUP - tensor)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would say (1,2) - one in V and two in its dual. I would not call the tensor itself covariant or contravariant. I would say that the components transform co- or contravariantly. In this case, the components would be of the form ##T^a_{bc}## with the ##a## being labelled as a contravariant index whereas ##bc## would be labelled covariant.
 
Thanks, that was my understanding, too. And, yes, that was my problem: the distinction between "transforms as" which refers to the behavior in a change of coordinates and the property itself, because mathematically the dual ##bc## part changes direction of morphisms and thus should have been contra instead of co. So the point is, that mathematicians use these terms as a property of functors whereas physicists refer to coordinates w.r.t. the same object.

I hope I finally got it now.
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 78 ·
3
Replies
78
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K