Is there a mistake in this tensor multiplication problem?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the tensor multiplication involving antisymmetric rank-2 tensors M and N, specifically the expression involving the Levi-Civita symbol εijkl. Participants analyze the expression εijkl(MijNkl + NijMkl) and debate its validity, concluding that it does not equal zero under general conditions. The reasoning hinges on the properties of antisymmetry and the specific permutations of indices, leading to the assertion that the expression evaluates to 2εijklMijNkl.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of tensor algebra and operations
  • Familiarity with antisymmetric tensors and their properties
  • Knowledge of the Levi-Civita symbol and its applications
  • Basic combinatorial reasoning involving permutations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Levi-Civita symbol in tensor calculus
  • Explore antisymmetric tensor operations in detail
  • Learn about the implications of tensor products in physics
  • Investigate specific examples of tensor identities and their proofs
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students studying advanced topics in tensor analysis, particularly those working with general relativity or continuum mechanics.

DuckAmuck
Messages
238
Reaction score
40
Homework Statement
Show that
epsilon_{ijkl} ( M^{ij} N^{kl} + N^{ij} M^{kl}) = 0
Relevant Equations
epsilon is the 4D anti-symmetric Levi-Cevita tensor. M and N are also anti-symmetric tensors.
ep_{ijkl} M^{ij} N^{kl} + ep_{ijkl}N^{ij} M^{kl}
The second term can be rewritten with indices swapped
ep_{klij} N^{kl}M^{ij}
Shuffle indices around in epsilon
ep{klij} = ep{ijkl}
Therefore the expression becomes
2ep_{ijkl}M^{ij}N^{kl}
Not zero.
What is wrong here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I tried, but got the same result as you did. Are you sure its not supposed to be
##\epsilon_{ijkl} ( M^{ij} N^{kl} - N^{ij} M^{kl}) = 0##?
What I did was to write everything out, using all even permutations of 1,2,3,4:
{1,2,3,4}, {1,3,4,2}, {1,4,2,3}, {2,1,4,3}, {2,3,1,4}, {2,4,3,1}, {3,1,2,4}, {3,2,4,1}, {3,4,1,2}, {4,1,3,2}, {4,2,1,3}, {4,3,2,1}
and all odd ones:
{1,2,4,3}, {1,3,2,4}, {1,4,3,2}, {2,1,3,4}, {3,2,1,4}, {4,2,3,1}, {2,3,4,1}, {2,4,1,3}, {3,1,4,2}, {3,4,2,1}, {4,1,2,3}, {4,3,1,2}
and the fact that ##M## and ##N## are anti-symmetrical, i.e. ##M^{12}= - M^{21}## etc.
 
ok i think i have solid reasoning here:

Suppose ##C^{ij} = M^{ij} + N^{ij}##

From symmetry and antisymmetry we have:

##\epsilon_{ijkl} C^{ij}C^{kl} = 0##

Also if you foil the CC product in terms of M and N you get ##C^{ij}C^{kl} = M^{ij}M^{kl} + N^{ij}N^{kl} + M^{ij}N^{kl} + N^{ij}M^{kl}##

The MM and NN terms are zero for the same reason the CC product is when multiplied by epsilon.

So this demands that

##\epsilon_{ijkl} (M^{ij}N^{kl} + N^{ij}M^{kl}) = 0##

Can someone please verify?
 
DuckAmuck said:
ok i think i have solid reasoning here:

Suppose ##C^{ij} = M^{ij} + N^{ij}##

From symmetry and antisymmetry we have:

##\epsilon_{ijkl} C^{ij}C^{kl} = 0##

Also if you foil the CC product in terms of M and N you get ##C^{ij}C^{kl} = M^{ij}M^{kl} + N^{ij}N^{kl} + M^{ij}N^{kl} + N^{ij}M^{kl}##

The MM and NN terms are zero for the same reason the CC product is when multiplied by epsilon.

So this demands that

##\epsilon_{ijkl} (M^{ij}N^{kl} + N^{ij}M^{kl}) = 0##

Can someone please verify?
No, the statement as it stands seems false to me. It is not generally the case thar ##\epsilon_{ijkl} C^{ij} C^{kl} = 0##.
 
  • Like
Likes malawi_glenn
Orodruin said:
No, the statement as it stands seems false to me. It is not generally the case thar ##\epsilon_{ijkl} C^{ij} C^{kl} = 0##.
You’re right. I am just trying to figure out *how* this could be zero at this point, as in what conditions. Otherwise I’m stumped.
 
DuckAmuck said:
I am just trying to figure out *how* this could be zero at this point, as in what conditions.

You should have been given all the conditions already, that M and N are antisymmetric rank-2 tensors.

There is always the possibility that whoever gave you this problem, is wrong / made a typo. I have been tearing my hair off several times doing excersices in general relativity books... to find out there was some typo in the problem as written.

Here is my "expanded" calculation that I did btw:

The underlined terms I will collect at the end.

## \underline{M^{12}N^{34}} + M^{13}N^{42} + M^{14}N^{23} + \underline{M^{21}N^{43}} + M^{23}N^{14} + M^{24}N^{31} + M^{31}N^{24} + M^{32}N^{41} + M^{34}N^{12} + M^{41}N^{32} + M^{42}N^{13} + M^{43}N^{21} ##
##- ( \underline{M^{12}N^{43}} + M^{13}N^{24} + M^{14}N^{32} + \underline{M^{21}N^{34}} + M^{32}N^{14} + M^{42}N^{31} + M^{23}N^{41} + M^{24}N^{13} + M^{31}N^{42} + M^{34}N^{21} + M^{41}N^{23} + M^{43}N^{12} )##
##+ N^{12}M^{34} + N^{13}M^{42} + N^{14}M^{23} + N^{21}M^{43} + N^{23}M^{14} + N^{24}M^{31} + N^{31}M^{24} + N^{32}M^{41} + \underline{N^{34}M^{12}} + N^{41}M^{32} + N^{42}M^{13} + \underline{N^{43}M^{21}} ##
##- ( N^{12}M^{43} + N^{13}M^{24} + N^{14}M^{32} + N^{21}M^{34} + N^{32}M^{14} + N^{42}M^{31} + N^{23}M^{41} + N^{24}M^{13} + N^{31}M^{42} + \underline{N^{34}M^{21}} + N^{41}M^{23} + \underline{N^{43}M^{12}} \: ) ##

The stuff I underlined:
## M^{12}N^{34} + M^{21}N^{43} - M^{12}N^{43} - M^{21}N^{34} + N^{34}M^{12} +N^{43}M^{21} -N^{34}M^{21} - N^{43}M^{12} ##

(##M^{21}= - M^{12}## and ##N^{43}= - N^{34}##)

##M^{12}N^{34} + (-1)^2 M^{12}N^{34} - (-1)M^{12}N^{34} - (-1)M^{12}N^{34} + N^{34}M^{12} +(-1)^2N^{34}M^{12} - (-1)N^{34}M^{12} - (-1)N^{34}M^{12} = 8M^{12}N^{34} ##

Well that was fun.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
13K