Terminal Speed for Skier Going Down Slope

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the terminal speed of a skier descending a slope, considering factors such as mass, angle of descent, and drag force. The problem involves physics concepts related to forces, motion, and drag coefficients.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the initial attempt at calculating terminal speed using a drag force equation and question the accuracy of the drag coefficient used. There is also exploration of the significance of significant figures in the final answer.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided feedback on the calculations and assumptions, suggesting that the drag coefficient may need reconsideration based on the skier's position. Others have noted discrepancies in the expected answer and are seeking further clarification from instructors.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the importance of unit consistency and the potential impact of different drag coefficients based on the skier's orientation. There is an ongoing inquiry into the correct application of physics principles in this context.

adamwest
Messages
9
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



What is the terminal speed for an 75.0kg skier going down a 35.0∘ snow-covered slope on wooden skis μk= 0.060?

Assume that the skier is 1.60m tall and 0.300m wide.

Express your answer using two significant figures with the appropriate units.

Area skier = A = (1.60m x 0.300m) = .48 m^2

Homework Equations



D = (1/4)A*v^2
Fnet = D

The Attempt at a Solution



(mgsinθ) - (μk*mgcosθ) = (1/4)A*v^2

=> vterminal = sqrt((4((mgsinθ) - (μk*mgcosθ))) /A )

vterminal = sqrt((4((75.0 * 9.80 * sin(35)) - (.060 * 75.0 * 9.80 * cos(35))))/.48)

vterminal = 56.68 m/s = 57 m/s (rounded to 2 sig figs)

Mastering Physics says that this answer is wrong but I cannot find my error. I have checked over the problem and my solution about a dozen times. I figure more experienced eyes may help find my ruinous mistake. Thank you! :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your work looks good to me. The data in the problem is given to 3 significant figures. Maybe you are supposed to keep 3 sig figs in the answer. Don't know.
 
Thanks for double checking for me, I really appreciate it. :)

I actually tried submitting it with 3 sig figs as well but it said it was wrong. I am going to email my professor and see if they can take a look.
 
D = (1/4)A*v^2

I believe this equation for drag force assumes a spherical shape for the drag coefficient (C_drag = about 0.5) . If the skier is standing more or less upright rather tham curled up like a ball, the drag coefficient is higher, and thus the terminal speed will be less. The quadratic drag force is actually 1/2(C_drag)ρ(A)v^2, where ρ is the air density(about 1.2 kg/m^3), and C_drag for a flat exposed surface might be more like 1.0 or so.
When I last went snow tubing, I knew my speed was much faster when lying back instead of sitting up. And faster than that when going with my grandkids 2 or more per tube and faster than that with several tube loads of kids hooked together in a lying down position! What a rush!
 
It looks like you were right, PhantomJay. I should have seen this before but I didn't check my units. The answer is as follows:

sqrt((2mg/ACp)*(sinθ-μkcosθ))

If you do it this way then you get all of the correct units (m/s) in the end after taking the square root. I used the following:

p (rho) = 1.2 kg/m^3
m = 75.0 kg
g = 9.80 m/s^2
θ = 35 degrees
μk = 0.060
C = 0.8

When you plug all of these into the equation you get a terminal velocity of v = 41 m/s (to 2 significant figures), which is the correct answer.

The only thing I am still unclear on is why we use a drag co-efficient of C = 0.8, which closely resembles a cylinder falling end-down, instead of a drag co-efficient of C = 1.1, which closely resembles a cyclinder falling side-down. I feel like a skier standing upright is affected by drag more similarly to the side of a cylinder than the bottom of one. Perhaps it has to do with the fact that they are falling at an angle? I don't know.

Anyways, thank you all for your help! :)
 
Thank you So much Sir/Madam, i tried a thousand times, spent an hour and 15 mins trying, but failing. Thank you again!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
16K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K