Terminal Velocity of a Falling Parachutist

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the terminal velocity of a falling parachutist, focusing on the dynamics of motion and the effects of initial velocity and weight on terminal velocity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate terminal velocity using an equation of motion but questions the role of initial velocity in this context. Other participants point out errors in calculations and definitions, such as the distinction between weight and mass, and raise questions about the relationship between air resistance and weight.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes various attempts to clarify misunderstandings and correct errors, with some participants providing guidance on definitions. However, there is no explicit consensus on the relationship between air resistance and weight, and the original poster's initial approach remains under scrutiny.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the age of the thread and suggest that some aspects, such as the relationship of air resistance to weight and the units of measurement, may be less relevant to the current discussion.

Saptarshi Sarkar
Messages
98
Reaction score
13
Homework Statement
A parachutist is falling with a speed of 55m/s when his parachute opens. The total weight of the man and the parachute is W and the air resistance is Wv²/25 N, where v is the instantaneous velocity. The terminal velocity is

A) 10m/s
B) 5m/s
C) 11m/s
D) zero
Relevant Equations
W d²y/dt² = Wg - Wv²/25
I tried to calculate it by the way I know, i.e., setting the right hand side of the equation of motion to zero and getting

v² = 25g = 2500 (taking g =10)
=> v = 50m/s

But this answer is incorrect. How do I use the information of the initial velocity and why would it effect the terminal velocity? Shouldn't the terminal velocity be the same no matter what the initial velocity was?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
W is the weight, not the mass.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Saptarshi Sarkar
TSny said:
W is the weight, not the mass.

Thanks! I can't believe I did that mistake.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TSny
Also, 25g = 250, not 2500.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Saptarshi Sarkar
This raises another question. Why would the air resistance depend upon W?
 
This thread is about 3.5 years old. The original poster has not been seen for the last 1.5 years. We can probably ignore the problematic relationship of air resistance to weight.

We can also ignore the erroneout units of measurement specified in the problem statement. Velocity has units. It is not a pure number.

Clearly the problem is an exercise in formula manipulation, not physics.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dlgoff and berkeman

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K