Test of two distributions/functions

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter phonic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Test
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 2K views
phonic
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Dear All,

I have two functions that are defined on a table, i.e. [itex]f1(x,y), f2(x,y)[/itex], where x and y are bin indices, and [itex]1\leq f1(x,y) \leq 1[/itex], [itex]1\leq f2(x,y) \leq 1[/itex].

I would like to perform some test to show whether [itex]f1(x,y)[/itex] and [itex]f2(x,y)[/itex] are significantly different. Is there some way to do this? I thought of using chi square test for [itex]f1(x,y)+n[/itex] and [itex]f2(x,y)+n[/itex], where n>1 is a constant added to make [itex]f1(x,y)[/itex] and [itex]f2(x,y)[/itex] interpretable as frequencies.

Thanks a lot!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
phonic said:
I thought of using chi square test for [itex]f1(x,y)+n[/itex] and [itex]f2(x,y)+n[/itex], where n>1 is a constant added to make [itex]f1(x,y)[/itex] and [itex]f2(x,y)[/itex] interpretable as frequencies.

Statistical signficance is not a meaningful concept unless you are dealing with a phenomena that involves probability. To do the usual type of "hypothesis testing" , you must assume the two functions are generated by the same probabalistic process. Until you state exactly what that process is, it isn't possible to say what sort of statistical test is appropriate.

For example if we assume each table is generated by one realization of the uniform [0,1] random variable u according to the formula [itex]f(i,j) = (-0.5)(i) - (0.5)(j) + u[/itex] then it wouldn't make sense to do a chi square test.