Testing Convergence/Divergence of Series

  • Thread starter Thread starter DryRun
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series Testing
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around testing the convergence or divergence of the series \(\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{n!}{4.7.10...(3n+1)}x^n\) for \(x > 0\). Participants are exploring the application of the ratio test due to the presence of the factorial in the series.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of the ratio test and the importance of including the absolute value of \(x\). There are questions about the derivation of terms in the ratio and the implications of different values of \(x\) on the convergence of the series. Some participants suggest clarifying the multiplication of fractions to enhance understanding.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing feedback on each other's calculations and reasoning. Some have pointed out potential errors in the application of the ratio test, while others are exploring the implications of different limits for \(x\). There is a recognition of the need to consider additional tests for specific values of \(x\) where the ratio test is inconclusive.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the original problem states \(x > 0\), which influences the interpretation of results. There is ongoing uncertainty about how to handle cases where \(x\) approaches critical values affecting convergence.

DryRun
Gold Member
Messages
837
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
Test the series for convergence or divergence[tex]\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{n!}{4.7.10...(3n+1)}x^n,\; x>0[/tex]

The attempt at a solution

I've decided to use the ratio test because of the factorial.
[tex]L=\lim_{n\to \infty}\frac{u_{n+1}}{u_n}[/tex]
I worked it out and i got:
[tex]L=\lim_{n\to \infty}\frac{4x(3n+1)(n+1)}{3n+4}=\lim_{n\to \infty}\frac{4x(3n^2+4n+1)}{3n+4}[/tex] Then, i did long division for the n terms.
[tex]\lim_{n\to \infty} 4x \left( n+ \frac{1}{3n+4}\right)=4x\lim_{n\to \infty} \left( n+ \frac{1}{3n+4}\right)=4x(∞+1/∞)=∞[/tex]
According to the ratio test, since L>1, the series diverges.

Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You ratio test should have an |x| in there. But something else is wrong with your ratio. Where did the 4 and the (3n+1) come from?
 
Perhaps if you wrote the multiplication of the fractions out in detail, it would be clearer.
 
sharks said:
Homework Statement
Test the series for convergence or divergence[tex]\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{n!}{4.7.10...(3n+1)}x^n,\; x>0[/tex]

The attempt at a solution

I've decided to use the ratio test because of the factorial.
[tex]L=\lim_{n\to \infty}\frac{u_{n+1}}{u_n}[/tex]
I worked it out and i got:
[tex]L=\lim_{n\to \infty}\frac{4x(3n+1)(n+1)}{3n+4}[/tex]
Show us how you arrived at this result. As LCKurtz pointed out, there should be a factor of |x| in it.
 
[tex]u_n=\frac{n!x^n}{4.7.10...(3n+1)}[/tex]
[tex]u_{n+1}=\frac{(n+1)!x^{n+1}}{4.7.10...(3(n+1)+1)}[/tex]
[tex]\frac{u_{n+1}}{u_n}=\frac{(n+1)!x^{n+1}}{4.7.10...(3(n+1)+1)}\times \frac{4.7.10...(3n+1)}{n!x^n}[/tex]
[tex]\frac{u_{n+1}}{u_n}=\frac{(n+1)n!x^nx}{4.7.10...(3(n+1)+1)}\times \frac{4.7.10...(3n+1)}{n!x^n}[/tex]
OK, i realize that i had made a mistake previously, but I'm still not sure:[tex]\frac{u_{n+1}}{u_n}=\frac{(n+1)x}{(3(n+1)+1)}= \frac {(n+1)x} {(3n+4)}[/tex]Doing long division:[tex]\frac {(n+1)x} {(3n+4)}=\frac{1}{3}x-\frac{x}{3(3n+4))}[/tex]Taking the limit, gives:[tex]\lim_{n\to\infty} \left[ \frac{1}{3}x-\frac{x}{3(3n+4)}\right]= \frac{1}{3}x[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Yes, that is correct- although again, you have dropped the absolute value sign on x.

Now, do you remember why you divided those fractions? You wanted to use the ratio test. What does the ratio test say?
 
sharks said:
[tex]\frac{u_{n+1}}{u_n}=\frac{(n+1)x}{(3(n+1)+1)}= \frac {(n+1)x} {(3n+4)}[/tex]
Doing long division:
<snip>
Long division is unnecessary.

$$|x|\frac{n+1}{3n + 4} = |x|\frac{n(1 + 1/n)}{n(3 + 4/n)}$$
 
HallsofIvy said:
Yes, that is correct- although again, you have dropped the absolute value sign on x.

Now, do you remember why you divided those fractions? You wanted to use the ratio test. What does the ratio test say?

I have a few doubts/questions:

1) I conclude that the requirement of having the absolute value sign on x is due to [itex]x > 0[/itex] in the original problem. In that case, the absolute value sign should appear as from the first line in post #5, as [itex]|x^n|[/itex], and in the second line, as [itex]|x^{n+1}|[/itex]. Correct?

2) Instead of [itex]\frac{1}{3}|x|[/itex], could i have alternatively given the answer as [itex]\frac{1}{3}x,\; x>0[/itex]? This should mean the same thing.

3) Now that i know the evaluation of the limit is [itex]\frac{1}{3}|x|[/itex], i need to find the value of L to know if the series converges or diverges.
However, here is the problem: I do not know the value of x. If x>3, then L>1 and the series diverges, but here is another possibility: if x=3, then L=1 and this means the series can either converge or diverge. A third possibility is if x<3, then L<1 and the series converges.
So, my question is: how do i know which value will x have? Although, x>0 does seem to indicate that i can take it to be as large a value as i like, in which case, L>1.

After some more thinking, i figure that as x increases from 0 to a value greater than 3, the series first converges, then diverges. But I'm not sure what the final answer should be.
 
Last edited:
sharks said:
I have a few doubts/questions:

1) I conclude that the requirement of having the absolute value sign on x is due to [itex]x > 0[/itex] in the original problem.
There's nothing in the original problem that says x > 0. In the Ratio Test, you look at this limit:
$$\lim_{n \to \infty}\left| \frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n}\right|$$

sharks said:
In that case, the absolute value sign should appear as from the first line in post #5, as [itex]|x^n|[/itex], and in the second line, as [itex]|x^{n+1}|[/itex]. Correct?
Yes, but you can write these as |x|n and |x|n+1.
sharks said:
2) Instead of [itex]\frac{1}{3}|x|[/itex], could i have alternatively given the answer as [itex]\frac{1}{3}x,\; x>0[/itex]? This should mean the same thing.
Bad idea since you are potentially losing half the interval of convergence.
sharks said:
3) Now that i know the evaluation of the limit is [itex]\frac{1}{3}|x|[/itex], i need to find the value of L to know if the series converges or diverges.

However, here is the problem: I do not know the value of x. If x>3, then L>1 and the series diverges, but here is another possibility: if x=3, then L=1 and this means the series can either converge or diverge. A third possibility is if x<3, then L<1 and the series converges.
So, my question is: how do i know which value will x have? Although, x>0 does seem to indicate that i can take it to be as large a value as i like, in which case, L>1.

If |x|/3 < 1 the series converges absolutely. What interval does that represent?
If |x|/3 = 1, the Ratio Test is inconclusive. Substitute the two values of x into the original series, and use some other test to determine the convergence/divergence of each of these two endpoints.
 
  • #10
Mark44 said:
If |x|/3 < 1 the series converges absolutely. What interval does that represent?
Since x cannot be a negative value and the original problem states that x>0, [tex]0<|x|<3[/tex]
Mark44 said:
If |x|/3 = 1, the Ratio Test is inconclusive. Substitute the two values of x into the original series, and use some other test to determine the convergence/divergence of each of these two endpoints.
The two values of x must be: <3 and >3. I choose x=1 and x=4. I'm not sure what you mean here.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Apologies - I missed that it says x > 0 in your OP.

|x|/3 < 1 ==> -3 < x < 3
Since we also have x > 0, the interval reduces to 0 < x < 3, so I will dispense with absolute values.

If x/3 > 1, the Ratio Test says the series diverges (i.e., if x > 3).

If x/3 = 1, or equivalently, if x = 3, the Ratio Test is inconclusive. Use some other test to determine whether the series converges or diverges at this value.
 
  • #12
Mark44 said:
If x/3 = 1, or equivalently, if x = 3, the Ratio Test is inconclusive. Use some other test to determine whether the series converges or diverges at this value.

So, my final answer will have to comprise of 3 parts: when 0<x<3, x>3 and x=3. Correct?

Now, at x=3, the series becomes: [tex]\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{n!}{4.7.10...(3n+1)}3^n[/tex]I would usually immediately go for the Ratio Test, but since i have to use another test... I would say the comparison test or the limit comparison test. But i don't know with what expression to compare it to, due to the n! term. I think the nth-term test might be easier, but then i would need to differentiate the numerator which contains n! and what's the derivative of n! w.r.t.n?
 
  • #13
If you're thinking "derivative" you're probably thinking L'Hopital's Rule, which is the wrong direction to go, IMO.

Break up the general term of the series like this...
$$\frac{1}{4} \frac{2}{7} \frac{3}{10}... \frac{n}{3n + 1}\cdot~3^n $$

Each of the fractions is bounded above and below, and there are n of them. Write an inequality with 3 members, with the above in the middle, and then take the limit of all three members.
 
  • #14
In your expression above, the numerator should be n! not just n, right?

The sequence of partial sums:[tex]S_n=\frac{3}{4}+\frac{18}{28}+\frac{162}{280}+...[/tex]
The sequence:[tex]a_n=\frac{n!}{3n + 1}\cdot~3^n=\frac{3}{4},\frac{18}{7},\frac{54}{10},...[/tex]
I have no idea what I'm doing.
 
Last edited:
  • #15
sharks said:
In your expression above, the numerator should be n! not just n, right?
No. I have broken n! up into 1*2*3* ... *n.
 
  • #16
OK, just to clarify your suggestion, for n=3:
[tex]\frac{1}{4} \frac{2}{7} \frac{3}{10}... \frac{n}{3n + 1}\cdot~3^n=\frac{1}{4}\times \frac{2}{7}\times \frac{3}{10}... \frac{n}{3n + 1}\cdot~3^n[/tex] But in your expression, [itex]3^n[/itex] is not multiplied into the product. It should have been:[tex]\left( \frac{1}{4}\times \frac{2}{7}\times \frac{3}{10}\right)\cdot~3^3... \frac{n}{3n + 1}\cdot~3^n[/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #17
sharks said:
OK, just to clarify your suggestion, for n=3:
[tex]\frac{1}{4} \frac{2}{7} \frac{3}{10}... \frac{n}{3n + 1}\cdot~3^n=\frac{1}{4}\times \frac{2}{7}\times \frac{3}{10}... \frac{n}{3n + 1}\cdot~3^n[/tex]
Yes, those are the same. I debated with myself about putting parentheses around each fraction, but decided it wasn't necessary.
sharks said:
But in your expression, [itex]3^n[/itex] is not multiplied into the product. It should have been:[tex]\left( \frac{1}{4}\times \frac{2}{7}\times \frac{3}{10}\right)\cdot~3^3... \frac{n}{3n + 1}\cdot~3^n[/tex]

No it shouldn't. That's not the way multiplication works. You are apparently thinking that there is some distributive product for multiplication. There isn't.

IOW, this is NOT TRUE: (ab)c = (ac)(bc)

Multiplication distributes over addition ( a(b + c) = ab + ac) , but it doesn't distribute over multiplication!
 
  • #18
But i don't understand how to write an inequality out of these. Here's an attempt:
[tex]\left( \frac{1}{4}<\frac{2}{7}<\frac{3}{10}<\frac{n}{3n + 1}\right)3^n[/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #19
For a start, let's focus on the fractions:
(1/4)(2/7)(3/10)...(n/(3n + 1))

1. How many fractions are in the above?
2. Every fraction above is >= what number?
3. Hence, the product above is >= what number?
4. Every fraction above is < what number?
5. Hence, the product above is < what number?

Now can you write an inequality involving (1/4)(2/7)(3/10)...(n/(3n + 1))3n?
 
  • #20
Mark44 said:
For a start, let's focus on the fractions:
(1/4)(2/7)(3/10)...(n/(3n + 1))

1. How many fractions are in the above?
2. Every fraction above is >= what number?
3. Hence, the product above is >= what number?
4. Every fraction above is < what number?
5. Hence, the product above is < what number?

Now can you write an inequality involving (1/4)(2/7)(3/10)...(n/(3n + 1))3n?

1. There are 4 fractions.

2. [itex]\frac{2}{7}>\frac{1}{4},\; \frac{3}{10}>\frac{2}{7},\; \frac{n}{3n + 1}>\frac{3}{10}[/itex]

3. Hence, [itex]\frac{n}{3n + 1}>\frac{1}{4}[/itex]

4. Every fraction above is less than [itex]3^n[/itex]

5. Hence, [itex]\frac{n}{3n + 1}< 3^n[/itex]

The inequality is:
[tex]\frac{1}{4}< \frac{n}{3n + 1}<3^n[/tex]
If the above inequality is correct, then taking the limits for all 3 members:
[tex]\lim_{n \to \infty}\frac{1}{4}=\frac{1}{4}[/tex]
[tex]\lim_{n \to \infty}\frac{n}{3n + 1}=\lim_{n \to \infty}\frac{1}{3 + 1/n}=\frac{1}{3}[/tex]
[tex]\lim_{n \to \infty}3^n=∞[/tex]The first two limits converges and the third limit diverges. What does this mean? The squeeze theorem fails in this case.
 
Last edited:
  • #21
Mark44 said:
For a start, let's focus on the fractions:
(1/4)(2/7)(3/10)...(n/(3n + 1))

1. How many fractions are in the above?
2. Every fraction above is >= what number?
3. Hence, the product above is >= what number?
4. Every fraction above is < what number?
5. Hence, the product above is < what number?

Now can you write an inequality involving (1/4)(2/7)(3/10)...(n/(3n + 1))3n?

sharks said:
1. There are 4 fractions.
That's literally true, but you are ignoring the ellipsis (...). If I write 1, 2, 3, ..., n, how many numbers am I implying?
sharks said:
2. [itex]\frac{2}{7}>\frac{1}{4},\; \frac{3}{10}>\frac{2}{7},\; \frac{n}{3n + 1}>\frac{3}{10}[/itex]
Yes, and since 1/4 < 2/7 < 3/10 < ... < n/(3n + 1), every fraction is greater than or equal to 1/4.
sharks said:
3. Hence, [itex]\frac{n}{3n + 1}>\frac{1}{4}[/itex]
Yes.
sharks said:
4. Every fraction above is less than [itex]3^n[/itex]
That's true, but not relevant, considering that we're focusing on just the fractions.

Considering just the fractions, each fraction is >= 1/4, so the product of these fractions is >= ? (Consider how many of them there are, which is why I asked question #1.

Now, can you get an upper bound on each fraction?
Can you get an upper bound on their product?

Everything below here is nonproductive...
sharks said:
5. Hence, [itex]\frac{n}{3n + 1}< 3^n[/itex]

The inequality is:
[tex]\frac{1}{4}< \frac{n}{3n + 1}<3^n[/tex]
If the above inequality is correct, then taking the limits for all 3 members:
[tex]\lim_{n \to \infty}\frac{1}{4}=\frac{1}{4}[/tex]
[tex]\lim_{n \to \infty}\frac{n}{3n + 1}=\lim_{n \to \infty}\frac{1}{3 + 1/n}=\frac{1}{3}[/tex]
[tex]\lim_{n \to \infty}3^n=∞[/tex]The first two limits converges and the third limit diverges. What does this mean? The squeeze theorem fails in this case.
 
  • #22
Mark44 said:
That's literally true, but you are ignoring the ellipsis (...). If I write 1, 2, 3, ..., n, how many numbers am I implying?
Infinite numbers, from 1, up to number, n. So, in this problem, there is an infinite number of fractions, from [itex]\frac{1}{4} \; to \frac{n}{3n + 1}[/itex].
4. Every fraction above is < what number?
[tex]\frac{n}{3n + 1}[/tex]
5. Hence, the product above is < what number?
[tex]\left( \frac{1}{4}\times \frac{2}{7}\times \frac{3}{10}\times ... \times \frac{n}{3n + 1}\right)<\frac{n}{3n + 1}[/tex]
So,
[tex]\frac{n}{3n + 1}>\left( \frac{1}{4}\times \frac{2}{7}\times \frac{3}{10}\times ... \times \frac{n}{3n + 1}\right)[/tex]
And, [tex]\left( \frac{1}{4}\times \frac{2}{7}\times \frac{3}{10}\times ... \times \frac{n}{3n + 1}\right)≥\frac{1}{4}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #23
No, 1, 2, 3, ..., n is NOT an infinitely long list of numbers.

If I had written 1, 2, 3, ..., n, ... then that would have been a correct answer, but my list stops (i.e., is finite) at n. The ellipsis indicates that the pattern repeats indefinitely.

Go back to post #21 and answer the questions I asked.
 
  • #24
Mark44 said:
No, 1, 2, 3, ..., n is NOT an infinitely long list of numbers.

If I had written 1, 2, 3, ..., n, ... then that would have been a correct answer, but my list stops (i.e., is finite) at n. The ellipsis indicates that the pattern repeats indefinitely.

Go back to post #21 and answer the questions I asked.
Yes, it's a list of n numbers. :redface:
1. How many fractions are in the above?
There are n fractions.
4. Every fraction above is < what number?
[tex]\frac{n+1}{3(n+1) + 1}[/tex]
5. Hence, the product above is < what number?
[tex]\left( \frac{1}{4}\times \frac{2}{7}\times \frac{3}{10}\times ... \times \frac{n}{3n + 1}\right)<\frac{n+1}{3(n+1) + 1}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #25
OK, now we're getting somewhere.

1/4 <= 1/4
1/4 < 2/7
1/4 < 3/10
...
1/4 < n/(3n + 1)
So ? < (1/4)(2/7)(3/10)...(n/(3n+1))
Please don't tell me that ? = 1/4
 
  • #26
Mark44 said:
OK, now we're getting somewhere.

1/4 <= 1/4
1/4 < 2/7
1/4 < 3/10
...
1/4 < n/(3n + 1)
So ? < (1/4)(2/7)(3/10)...(n/(3n+1))
Please don't tell me that ? = 1/4
The product of proper fractions gives increasingly smaller fractions, then... the answer can only be 0, unless it's a negative number, which is not possible, as n increases from 1 in the series. So, 0 < (1/4)(2/7)(3/10)...(n/(3n+1))
 
  • #27
You're still thinking in terms of infinitely many factors. The product is not 0, and is in fact larger than 0. All of the fractions are positive, so I don't see how a negative product even enters into the discussion.

Try again...
 
  • #28
How about a geometric series, with [itex]r=\frac{n}{3n+1}[/itex] and [itex]a=\frac{1}{4}[/itex]
Then, [tex]S_n= \frac {a}{1-r}= \frac{\frac{1}{4}}{1- \frac{n}{3n+1}}[/tex]
So, [itex]S_n<(1/4)(2/7)(3/10)...(n/(3n+1))[/itex]
 
  • #29
In a geometric series, the terms are added, not multiplied.

Since we're already 29 posts into this, here's a clue:

1/4 <= 1/4
1/4 < 2/7
so (1/4)2 < (1/4)(2/7)
 
  • #30
Mark44 said:
In a geometric series, the terms are added, not multiplied.

Since we're already 29 posts into this, here's a clue:

1/4 <= 1/4
1/4 < 2/7
so (1/4)2 < (1/4)(2/7)
I didn't see the problem from that angle. Here it is:
[tex](1/4)^n<(1/4)(2/7)(3/10)...(n/(3n+1))[/tex]
So, the inequality becomes:
[tex](1/4)^n<(1/4)(2/7)(3/10)...(n/(3n+1))<n/(3n+1)[/tex]
Now, finding the limits:
[tex]\lim_{n \to \infty}\left( \frac{1}{4}\right)^n=0[/tex]
[tex]\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{n}{3n+1}=\frac{1}{3}[/tex]
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K