Convergence of a Complex Series

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the convergence of the series ∑(k=1 to ∞) 2^(3k) * 3^(1-2k). Initially, various convergence tests were considered, but none seemed applicable. By simplifying the expression to (3 * (8/9)^k), it became clear that the series is geometric with a common ratio of 8/9. The correct approach involves recognizing the series starts at k=1, requiring adjustment for the sum calculation. Ultimately, the series converges to 24, confirming the solution provided.
Draconifors
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



"Determine whether the following series converge or diverge. If the series is geometric or telescoping, find its sum.":

## \left ( \sum_{k=1}^\infty2^{3k} *3^{1-2k} \right)##

Homework Equations


[/B]
The different tests for convergence?

The Attempt at a Solution



Ok, I've looked at all the tests for convergence I know, and as far as I've been able to tell, none of them can work with this? Here's a quick outline about each of the tests and why I don't think I can use it.

Divergence Test: I have to say I can't even do the limit of this. It just gives me ##2^{infinity}*3^{1-infinity}##, no?
Geometric series: I don't have only one exponent, so I can't do this. Neither of the exponents looks like ##(n-1)## so I don't know.
Telescoping series: There's nothing that cancels out. I also can't take the limit.
p-Series: It's not in the form ##{\frac {1} {p}}##.
Alternating series: It doesn't have a ##-1^n## term.
Integral test: ##\int 2^{3k} *3^{1-2k} \, dx## . I can't integrate this because of the ##k## being a power.
Root test: While both are raised to a power of ##k##, I don't think I can apply the root test because of the ##1-2k##.
Ratio test: This is usually my go to, and I thought it would work. However, I get ##\frac {1} {9}## and then the ##3^{1-2k}## just stays there.
Comparison test: Even if I wanted to use the limit or direct comparison, I wouldn't even know what to compare it with.

The solutions tell me it's supposed to converge to 24 and to use the geometric test. However, I really don't see how the geometric test is supposed to apply.

Thanks for your time, and I hope I did everything right in posting this!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is simpler than what you're trying. Go back to the expression under the sum and try to see if you can put it in a simpler form first. Use the relations you know about exponents and multiplication, such as ## x^{nk}=(x^n)^k ##, or ## x^{p+q}=x^px^q ##, etc.
 
  • Like
Likes Draconifors
wabbit said:
This is simpler than what you're trying. Go back to the expression under the sum and try to see if you can put it in a simpler form first. Use the relations you know about exponents and multiplication, such as ## x^{nk}=(x^n)^k ##, or ## x^{p+q}=x^px^q ##, etc.

Ooh, that helped!
Ok, so doing that I get ##(2^3)^k*3^1*3^{-2k}##. That becomes ##3*8^k*3^{-2k}##. I can see where the 24 is supposed to come from: 3*8. I just can't get it to simplify to that.
I rearrange the expression so it's ##\frac{3*8^k}{3^{2k}}## and then that becomes ##({\frac{8}{9}})^k *3## If the summation started at k=0, I would see that this is a geometric sum with a = 3, r = 8/9. However, the summation starts at k=1, so shouldn't I have ##n-1## as an exponent?
 
Last edited:
Yep, you got it - about the starting point ## k=1 ## , you just need to be careful when determining the actual sum, using things like ## \sum_{k\geq 1}a_k=(\sum_{k\geq 0}a_k)-a_0 ##, or in your case using ## a^k=a\cdot a^{k-1} ## : while your series may not be exactly the standard geometric sum, you can express in terms of that.
 
  • Like
Likes Draconifors
Draconifors said:
Ooh, that helped!
Ok, so doing that I get ##(2^3)^k*3^1*3^{-2k}##. That becomes ##3*8^k*3^{-2k}##. I can see where the 24 is supposed to come from: 3*8. I just can't get it to simplify to that.
I rearrange the expression so it's ##\frac{3*8^k}{3^{2k}}## and then that becomes ##({\frac{8}{9}})^k *3## If the summation started at k=0, I would see that this is a geometric sum with a = 3, r = 8/9. However, the summation starts at k=1, so shouldn't I have ##n-1## as an exponent?
Either change the exponent or subtract off the "k= 0" term.
 
  • Like
Likes Draconifors
Alright, thank you very much to the two of you, this really helped me out!

Have a great day! :smile:
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K