Testing Your Color Vision: What Do You See?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the effectiveness of color vision tests, specifically the Ishihara test and the color blindness images available on Wikipedia. Participants noted that the Ishihara test is the "industry standard" for diagnosing color blindness, while the Wikipedia images were criticized for being too bright and difficult to interpret. One user, a confirmed deuteranope, shared their experience with both tests, highlighting the challenges of identifying colors on different monitors. Overall, the Ishihara test is recommended for accurate assessment of color vision.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of color vision and color blindness terminology
  • Familiarity with the Ishihara color vision test
  • Basic knowledge of monitor calibration and display settings
  • Awareness of color perception variations, such as deuteranopia
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the methodology and accuracy of the Ishihara test for color blindness
  • Explore the genetic basis of color vision deficiencies, focusing on deuteranopia
  • Learn about monitor calibration techniques to improve color accuracy
  • Investigate alternative color vision tests and their effectiveness compared to the Ishihara test
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for educators, healthcare professionals, and individuals interested in color vision testing, particularly those involved in fields requiring accurate color perception, such as photography and design.

Biology news on Phys.org
the first reference was okay.. I can see all the numbers as normal vision.

The wikipedia images appear faint.. the colors (of the numbers) in each image appear to be (1) light blue (2) pink (3) green and (4) purple. After staring at them for awhile I was able to identify 3 out of 4 correctly (when you click on image they give the answer)
 
The wikipedia images are really bad, they are much to bright. The Ishihara test should be the way to go. But on a computer monitor you never know for sure, because of the different kinds of monitors and the different video settings.
 
Wow, those wikipedia ones are pretty subtle all right. I've been tested before and have good colour vision (you need it to work in the photo industry), but I can barely see them enough to make out the right numbers.
 
The Ishihara tests are the "industry standard" and are used in both clinical and research seetings to dignose the type of colorblindness on has. The wikipedia images are pretty bad, but the accompanying info seems correct. I am a deuteranope who is missing the gene for green cones (I had the testing done as part of a research project on campus).
 
As child, before I got my first X-ray, I used to fantasize that I might have a mirror image anatomy - my heart on the right, my appendix on the right. Why not? (Caveat: I'm not talking about sci-fi molecular-level mirroring. We're not talking starvation because I couldn't process certain proteins, etc.) I'm simpy tlakng about, when a normal zygote divides, it technically has two options which way to form. Oen would expcet a 50:50 split. But we all have our heart on the left and our...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
18K
  • · Replies 81 ·
3
Replies
81
Views
11K
Replies
83
Views
18K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
25K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K