Tetherball rope wrapping around a pole

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the dynamics of a tetherball's string as it wraps around a pole, specifically analyzing the relationship between the string's tension, angular momentum, and the number of wraps. The key equation derived is for the angular velocity of the string, given by ##\dot{\theta} = v_0/(L-a\theta)##, where ##\theta## is the angle of wrapping, ##L## is the string length, and ##a## is the pole's radius. The conversation also touches on the complexities introduced by string elasticity and the need for simulation to further explore the problem, particularly in three-dimensional space.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts, including energy conservation and angular momentum.
  • Familiarity with two-dimensional and three-dimensional geometric representations.
  • Knowledge of differential equations to analyze rates of change.
  • Experience with simulation tools for modeling physical systems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of string elasticity on the dynamics of the tetherball system.
  • Learn how to simulate the motion of a tetherball using software like MATLAB or Python.
  • Investigate the mathematical modeling of angular momentum in non-conservative systems.
  • Study the effects of initial conditions on the trajectory of objects in circular motion.
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in the dynamics of rotating systems or the mathematical modeling of physical phenomena.

a sad student
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Not a homework question but an investigation:

A tetherball is tied to the top of a pole with a rope. When the ball spins around the pole, the rope starts to wrap around it. Using a pole with a fixed radius and a ball with a fixed mass, is it possible to find the number of wraps around a pole using a given initial tangential velocity?
Relevant Equations
Vt = rw
Fc = mv^2/r
My work so far is pretty basic, but I'm not too sure how to continue off from here. I haven't included the 2 dimensional aspect of it either, but I would presume that the rate of decrease in length is more sped up in that case? Would appreciate any help :(
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7717.JPG
    IMG_7717.JPG
    17.6 KB · Views: 251
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz
Physics news on Phys.org
Why not consider the two-dimensional analogue first: a circle of radius ##a## in the plane is the "pole", and a light, inextensible string is attached at, say, ##(a,0)##. Let the initial position of the ball be ##(a, L)##, where ##L## is the length of string, and let its initial velocity be ##(-v_0,0)##.

If the angle through which the string has wrapped is ##\theta##, then energy conservation implies that ##\dot{\theta} = v_0/(L-a\theta)##, but note that if the tension in the string is ##T## then the moment of the tension force is ##-aT## and the particle's angular momentum is not conserved. In any case, ##\dot{\theta}## is an increasing function of ##\theta## in the interval ##[0,L/a)## and the particle will collide with the pole no matter how small its (non-zero) initial speed ##v_0##; the number of wraps is always ##L/(2\pi a)##.

To make progress with the original query, you will probably need to play around with dissipation, string elasticity, etc.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: a sad student
a sad student said:
is it possible to find the number of wraps around a pole using a given initial tangential velocity?
Since it will descend at some (changing) angle, there's no advantage in taking the initial velocity as horizontal. In general, its velocity is angled down, making a right angle to the straight section of string.
I see no obvious relationship between the angle that velocity makes to the horizontal and the angle the string makes, though intuitively I feel they should be about the same.
In terms of the velocity, the current straight string length, the pole radius and those two angles, can you find equations for their rates of change?

Most likely, finding such equations is as far as you can go analytically. After that it would be simulation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DaveE, a sad student and ergospherical
Oh, I think I mis-interpreted the question. Do you intend consider the path of the string in three dimensional space when the string is fully wrapped around the cylinder? Ignore #2.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz and a sad student
Thank you guys for the replies! I've tried to expand on the problem a bit more, but I'm having trouble coming up with an additional equation to solve it (?). I also think that the angles should be equal but I'm having a hard time coming up with a proof for it. Here's my work (sorry it's a bit of a mess! added the second image bc i realized the quality wasn't great)
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7747.JPG
    IMG_7747.JPG
    36.2 KB · Views: 189
  • temp.PNG
    temp.PNG
    72.1 KB · Views: 163
a sad student said:
Thank you guys for the replies! I've tried to expand on the problem a bit more, but I'm having trouble coming up with an additional equation to solve it (?). I also think that the angles should be equal but I'm having a hard time coming up with a proof for it. Here's my work (sorry it's a bit of a mess! added the second image bc i realized the quality wasn't great)
It's easy to prove they are not necessarily equal: start it with the string down at some angle but with the mass going horizontally. What we might hope is that once equal they would remain equal, or better, that however they start they converge asymptotically to being equal.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
16K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
10K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K