Tetherball rope wrapping around a pole

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the physics of a tetherball's string wrapping around a pole, focusing on the dynamics of angular momentum and energy conservation. It highlights the relationship between the string's length, the pole's radius, and the ball's initial velocity, suggesting that the number of wraps is determined by the formula L/(2πa). Participants explore the implications of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional models, emphasizing the need for equations that describe the rates of change related to velocity and angles. The conversation also touches on the complexity of proving the relationship between the angles of velocity and string tension. Overall, the thread seeks to deepen the understanding of the mechanics involved in the tetherball's motion.
a sad student
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Not a homework question but an investigation:

A tetherball is tied to the top of a pole with a rope. When the ball spins around the pole, the rope starts to wrap around it. Using a pole with a fixed radius and a ball with a fixed mass, is it possible to find the number of wraps around a pole using a given initial tangential velocity?
Relevant Equations
Vt = rw
Fc = mv^2/r
My work so far is pretty basic, but I'm not too sure how to continue off from here. I haven't included the 2 dimensional aspect of it either, but I would presume that the rate of decrease in length is more sped up in that case? Would appreciate any help :(
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7717.JPG
    IMG_7717.JPG
    17.6 KB · Views: 242
Physics news on Phys.org
Why not consider the two-dimensional analogue first: a circle of radius ##a## in the plane is the "pole", and a light, inextensible string is attached at, say, ##(a,0)##. Let the initial position of the ball be ##(a, L)##, where ##L## is the length of string, and let its initial velocity be ##(-v_0,0)##.

If the angle through which the string has wrapped is ##\theta##, then energy conservation implies that ##\dot{\theta} = v_0/(L-a\theta)##, but note that if the tension in the string is ##T## then the moment of the tension force is ##-aT## and the particle's angular momentum is not conserved. In any case, ##\dot{\theta}## is an increasing function of ##\theta## in the interval ##[0,L/a)## and the particle will collide with the pole no matter how small its (non-zero) initial speed ##v_0##; the number of wraps is always ##L/(2\pi a)##.

To make progress with the original query, you will probably need to play around with dissipation, string elasticity, etc.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes a sad student
a sad student said:
is it possible to find the number of wraps around a pole using a given initial tangential velocity?
Since it will descend at some (changing) angle, there's no advantage in taking the initial velocity as horizontal. In general, its velocity is angled down, making a right angle to the straight section of string.
I see no obvious relationship between the angle that velocity makes to the horizontal and the angle the string makes, though intuitively I feel they should be about the same.
In terms of the velocity, the current straight string length, the pole radius and those two angles, can you find equations for their rates of change?

Most likely, finding such equations is as far as you can go analytically. After that it would be simulation.
 
  • Like
Likes DaveE, a sad student and ergospherical
Oh, I think I mis-interpreted the question. Do you intend consider the path of the string in three dimensional space when the string is fully wrapped around the cylinder? Ignore #2.
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz and a sad student
Thank you guys for the replies! I've tried to expand on the problem a bit more, but I'm having trouble coming up with an additional equation to solve it (?). I also think that the angles should be equal but I'm having a hard time coming up with a proof for it. Here's my work (sorry it's a bit of a mess! added the second image bc i realized the quality wasn't great)
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7747.JPG
    IMG_7747.JPG
    36.2 KB · Views: 175
  • temp.PNG
    temp.PNG
    72.1 KB · Views: 156
a sad student said:
Thank you guys for the replies! I've tried to expand on the problem a bit more, but I'm having trouble coming up with an additional equation to solve it (?). I also think that the angles should be equal but I'm having a hard time coming up with a proof for it. Here's my work (sorry it's a bit of a mess! added the second image bc i realized the quality wasn't great)
It's easy to prove they are not necessarily equal: start it with the string down at some angle but with the mass going horizontally. What we might hope is that once equal they would remain equal, or better, that however they start they converge asymptotically to being equal.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
16K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
10K
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Back
Top