Classical Textbooks of celestial mechanics

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on a request for classical mechanics resources, particularly those with a focus on celestial mechanics and mathematical rigor. The original poster expresses interest in understanding Kepler orbits and seeks textbooks that provide rigorous mathematical derivations, such as why orbits around the sun are elliptical. However, a response cautions that while Abraham and Marsden's "Foundations of Mechanics" offers a highly abstract and sophisticated mathematical treatment, it may not effectively teach practical physics or problem-solving skills. The conversation also highlights the necessity of understanding Hamiltonian formalism and perturbation theories for a serious study of celestial mechanics, suggesting that many existing textbooks in this area are challenging and somewhat outdated.
Santiago24
Messages
32
Reaction score
6
Hi I'm reading classical mechanics by Taylor and there is a section about Kepler orbits that i find very interesting so i'd like to see more of classical mechanics with space applications. I appreciate rigouros mathematical books, thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure you're after mathematical rigour? Abraham and Marsden's book Foundations of Mechanics contains a ridiculously abstract and mathematically-sophisticated exposition of celestial mechanics but it won't teach you much physics, or indeed how to solve many practical problems (!).
 
  • Like
Likes Santiago24 and vanhees71
Well, mathematical rigor and mathematical sophistication are not the same things.

In any case, I'm also interested in introductory textbooks for Celestial mechanics. I'm under the impression that any serious study of celestial mechanics requires a lot of knowledge of the Hamiltonian formalism and Hamiltonian perturbation theories (but that comes from reading books on analytical mechanics). The few books I know on celestial mechanics are quite hard and somewhat old.
 
  • Like
Likes ergospherical, vanhees71 and Santiago24
ergospherical said:
Are you sure you're after mathematical rigour? Abraham and Marsden's book Foundations of Mechanics contains a ridiculously abstract and mathematically-sophisticated exposition of celestial mechanics but it won't teach you much physics, or indeed how to solve many practical problems (!).
I want to see the mathematical derivation of things like why orbits around the sun are elliptical in Taylor book, thanks for the recommendations!
 
Hello Intellectuals! So far it seems to be reasonable to learn mathematics in a rigorous way by not solely considering the techniques of problem solving or the applications of a particular subject or concept. Also to truly appreciate the beauty of mathematical endeavor one need to learn the reasoning behind the origination of concepts in mathematics, so as a beginner it appears to be worthwhile to learn the highly abstract aspects of mathematics like proofs, logic, and topics in pure...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
8K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
6K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K