Classical Textbooks of celestial mechanics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a request for classical mechanics resources, particularly those with a focus on celestial mechanics and mathematical rigor. The original poster expresses interest in understanding Kepler orbits and seeks textbooks that provide rigorous mathematical derivations, such as why orbits around the sun are elliptical. However, a response cautions that while Abraham and Marsden's "Foundations of Mechanics" offers a highly abstract and sophisticated mathematical treatment, it may not effectively teach practical physics or problem-solving skills. The conversation also highlights the necessity of understanding Hamiltonian formalism and perturbation theories for a serious study of celestial mechanics, suggesting that many existing textbooks in this area are challenging and somewhat outdated.
Santiago24
Messages
32
Reaction score
6
Hi I'm reading classical mechanics by Taylor and there is a section about Kepler orbits that i find very interesting so i'd like to see more of classical mechanics with space applications. I appreciate rigouros mathematical books, thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure you're after mathematical rigour? Abraham and Marsden's book Foundations of Mechanics contains a ridiculously abstract and mathematically-sophisticated exposition of celestial mechanics but it won't teach you much physics, or indeed how to solve many practical problems (!).
 
  • Like
Likes Santiago24 and vanhees71
Well, mathematical rigor and mathematical sophistication are not the same things.

In any case, I'm also interested in introductory textbooks for Celestial mechanics. I'm under the impression that any serious study of celestial mechanics requires a lot of knowledge of the Hamiltonian formalism and Hamiltonian perturbation theories (but that comes from reading books on analytical mechanics). The few books I know on celestial mechanics are quite hard and somewhat old.
 
  • Like
Likes ergospherical, vanhees71 and Santiago24
ergospherical said:
Are you sure you're after mathematical rigour? Abraham and Marsden's book Foundations of Mechanics contains a ridiculously abstract and mathematically-sophisticated exposition of celestial mechanics but it won't teach you much physics, or indeed how to solve many practical problems (!).
I want to see the mathematical derivation of things like why orbits around the sun are elliptical in Taylor book, thanks for the recommendations!
 
TL;DR Summary: Book after Sakurai Modern Quantum Physics I am doing a comprehensive reading of sakurai and I have solved every problem from chapters I finished on my own, I will finish the book within 2 weeks and I want to delve into qft and other particle physics related topics, not from summaries but comprehensive books, I will start a graduate program related to cern in 3 months, I alreadily knew some qft but now I want to do it, hence do a good book with good problems in it first...
TLDR: is Blennow "Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering" a good follow-up to Altland "Mathematics for physicists"? Hello everybody, returning to physics after 30-something years, I felt the need to brush up my maths first. It took me 6 months and I'm currently more than half way through the Altland "Mathematics for physicists" book, covering the math for undergraduate studies at the right level of sophystication, most of which I howewer already knew (being an aerospace engineer)...

Similar threads

Replies
39
Views
7K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
47
Views
5K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
5K
Back
Top