Thank you in advance for your input and insights!

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the future prospects of nuclear science and engineering, considering its applications in energy production, medical fields, and research. Participants explore various factors that may influence the field's relevance, including environmental concerns and international policies.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that nuclear science may become increasingly important due to the global demand for energy, while others express concerns about its dangerous properties and environmental risks, citing incidents like Fukushima.
  • It is noted that nuclear science has applications beyond energy, including medical uses and research at facilities like CERN.
  • One participant argues that the future of nuclear engineering varies by country, indicating a bleak outlook in places like Germany and Japan, while suggesting better prospects in France.
  • There is a discussion about the interdisciplinary nature of nuclear engineering, with suggestions that careers in related fields such as materials science and radiation applications may still be viable even if nuclear energy faces opposition.
  • Participants clarify the distinction between nuclear engineering and nuclear physics, with some emphasizing that nuclear engineering does not focus on quantum mechanics or particle physics, while others note the overlap between these fields.
  • One participant asserts that studying nuclear engineering includes learning quantum mechanics, although research in that area is not typically conducted by nuclear engineers.
  • A participant currently studying nuclear engineering expresses optimism about the field's future, citing its potential as a widely used energy resource.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the future of nuclear science and engineering. There are multiple competing views regarding its relevance and the impact of environmental concerns, as well as differing opinions on the distinction between nuclear engineering and nuclear physics.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions highlight the dependence on national policies and public perception regarding nuclear energy, which may affect career prospects in the field. There are also unresolved distinctions regarding the roles of nuclear engineers versus nuclear physicists.

ameliatqy
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Future of Nuclear Science??

Dear all,

I would just like to ask about the prospects of nuclear science (nuclear engineering/research) in the future. Will it become a big thing due to the world's need for energy or fade out due to its dangerous properties and threat to the environment (e.g. Disaster at Fukishima). Or any other reasons?

Any help or feedback will be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


ameliatqy said:
Dear all,

I would just like to ask about the prospects of nuclear science (nuclear engineering/research) in the future. Will it become a big thing due to the world's need for energy or fade out due to its dangerous properties and threat to the environment (e.g. Disaster at Fukishima). Or any other reasons?

Any help or feedback will be greatly appreciated!

One thing you should be aware is that nuclear science is not just used for nuclear energy.

It is also used for medical purposes as well as research purposes (like at places like CERN for example) as well as for other purposes on top of these.
 


The traditional nuclear engineering consists of the engineering of fission reactors and fusion reactors. The near future of those two is country dependent. So, for example if you are in Germany or Japan most likely there is no future. If you are in France , you are in a good shape as a nuclear engineer.

One good thing about nuclear engineering is that many aspects of it are inter-discplinary. So even if there is no great future for the nuclear energy, it may still be ok to have it as a career. Examples include , specializing in materials science, thermal-hydraulics, radiation applications and detection. These are really interdisclinary fields and have applications in nuclear engineering and many many other fields.

My advice to you, specially if you live in country which has opposition to nuclear energy, is to to choose an inter-disciplinary topic as your career.

And CERN related research is not nuclear engineering! I say this because many physics enthusiatics join nuclear engineering departments hoping to learn about Quantum Mechanics and Particle Physics and then get disappointed when they are faced with the truth. While it is true as a nuclear engineer you need to have backgorund about these fancy areas, but these are never the expertise of a nuclear engineer.
 


Useful nucleus said:
And CERN related research is not nuclear engineering! I say this because many physics enthusiatics join nuclear engineering departments hoping to learn about Quantum Mechanics and Particle Physics and then get disappointed when they are faced with the truth. While it is true as a nuclear engineer you need to have backgorund about these fancy areas, but these are never the expertise of a nuclear engineer.

Just to clarify...this would be the job of a nuclear physicist, right? I thought it was nuclear researcher but I found no results on it...
 


ameliatqy said:
Just to clarify...this would be the job of a nuclear physicist, right? I thought it was nuclear researcher but I found no results on it...

Yes, this is mainly (nuclear, particle, QCD,...) physicist research.
 


Useful nucleus said:
And CERN related research is not nuclear engineering! I say this because many physics enthusiatics join nuclear engineering departments hoping to learn about Quantum Mechanics and Particle Physics and then get disappointed when they are faced with the truth. While it is true as a nuclear engineer you need to have backgorund about these fancy areas, but these are never the expertise of a nuclear engineer.

Not quite true, Useful Nucleus. CERN is primarily known for particle physics of course but it has a strong history of nuclear science research too. They are active in emerging nuclear science experiments such as high-pressure Xenon dark energy searches, and double beta decay experiments.

There is quite a lot of overlap between particle physics and nuclear science. And Quantum Mechanics is the very foundation of nuclear science. If you study Nuclear Engineering, you will study quantum mechanics. You won't do research on quantum mechanics, but you will use it as one of your core tools.
 


Useful nucleus said:
And CERN related research is not nuclear engineering!

Who said it was? The thread title does not say "engineering". . .
 


I'm currently getting my degree in nuclear engineering and I feel it has a future. It has the opportunity to become one of the world's most widely used energy resource and is quickly becoming important in many countries. I would encourage anyone interested in this field to look at the following sites for more information:

http://www.world-nuclear.org/

and

http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
11K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K