Thank you!Is my understanding of T-invariant subspaces correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter quasar_4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Subspaces
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of T-invariant subspaces in linear algebra, specifically regarding the relationship between a vector space V, a linear transformation T: V → V, and its invariant subspace U. It is established that any basis for the invariant subspace can be extended to a basis for the entire vector space. Furthermore, U can be T-invariant even if T maps from V to another vector space W, provided U exists in both V and W. The significance of T-invariance is highlighted through examples involving differentiable functions and eigen spaces.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear transformations and vector spaces
  • Familiarity with the concept of invariant subspaces
  • Knowledge of eigen spaces and generalized eigenspaces
  • Basic principles of linear algebra, including basis extension
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of T-invariant subspaces in linear algebra
  • Learn about the implications of linear transformations on vector spaces
  • Explore the relationship between eigenvalues and invariant subspaces
  • Investigate applications of T-invariance in differential equations and functional analysis
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying linear algebra, as well as educators seeking to clarify the concept of T-invariant subspaces and their applications in various mathematical contexts.

quasar_4
Messages
273
Reaction score
0
Hello,

can anyone tell me if I understand this right? :rolleyes:

I have a t-invariant subspace with basis B, and I extend the basis B to be a basis B' for the entire vector space by adding L.I. vectors to it. Then I put B under a linear transformation, T:V --> V, and I will get a set of vectors in the range of T that generates W in that space, i.e. R(T) = span (T(B)). But since the subspace (let's call it v) of V is T-invariant, then the vectors I end up with in R(T) are also in the subspace (minus the ones we added to extend the basis). Is that correct?

Also, can something only be T-invariant if it's a mapping within the same vector space? Can subspace v of V be t-invariant if the transformation is T: V --> W? I'm not sure if that makes sense, because the generating set in the R(T) couldn't be generating the same subset as in V.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is remarkably hard to read!

You have a vector space V and a linear transformation T:V-->V with invariant subspace what? W? "Then I put B under a linear transformation, T:V-->V" Is this the same T as for the "t-invarient subspace"?

Given a vector space V, a linear transformation T, and a T-invariant subspace U, yes, it is true that any basis for W can be extended to a basis for V. If W is the image of V under T: W= R(T), then clearly V must be a subspace of W. is that what you are asking?

U can be an invariant subspace for a linear transformation T:V-->W provided that U is in both V and W. For example, let V be all triples (x,y,0), W be all triples (0, y, z) and T(x,y,0)= (0, y, x). Then U= all triples of the form (0, y, 0) is a T- invariant subspace.
 
Sorry, I suppose that was a mouthful...

I am still just confused about t-invariance, I guess. What about this is significant? Apparently it's going to be important later on (according to my course instructor), but I'm having trouble understanding what t-invariant means beyond the formal definition.
 
Let V be the vector space of differentiable functions from R to R and T be differentiation. Then P(x) the set of polys is an invariant subspace, E(x) the subspace spanned by the exponential function is an invariant subspace.

Eigen spaces are invariant subspaces. Generalized eigenspaces are invariant subspaces. Subspaces preserved by T are good because T restricts to a linear map on the subspace.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K