The Absurdity of Polygamy: A Look at the Claims of a Dutch Professor

  • Thread starter Thread starter Monique
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stress
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the controversial claims made by a Dutch professor regarding polygamy, particularly its potential benefits in modern society. Participants explore various perspectives on the implications of polygamy for family dynamics, societal norms, and personal relationships.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express disbelief at the professor's claims, questioning the seriousness of his statements about polygamy and its benefits.
  • Others suggest that the professor's arguments may stem from a misunderstanding or misrepresentation of the concept, as indicated by a journalist's interpretation.
  • Several participants speculate on the professor's job security, with some betting on potential repercussions for his statements.
  • One viewpoint argues that legalizing polygandry (one woman with multiple husbands) could be more beneficial than polygyny (one man with multiple wives) for childcare responsibilities.
  • Concerns are raised about the practical implications of polygamy, including the potential for increased competition among men and the challenges of raising multiple children.
  • Some participants humorously reflect on the personal challenges of managing multiple partners, including domestic responsibilities and relationship dynamics.
  • A few comments touch on historical perspectives of marriage and gender roles, suggesting that polygamy could lead to negative outcomes for women.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the validity of the professor's claims or the practicality of polygamy. Multiple competing views remain, with some supporting the idea and others expressing skepticism or outright disagreement.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference cultural differences in attitudes toward polygamy, particularly contrasting Dutch tolerance with American perspectives. The discussion also highlights the lack of empirical evidence to support the claims made by the professor.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those exploring contemporary views on marriage, family structures, and societal norms, as well as individuals interested in the intersection of psychology and social policy.

  • #61
nfsh said:
Am on my way... :smile:

LOL! I hope you have a LOT of time. I'd start from the end and work backward in that thread. Once you get to (:rolleyes: *looks around, is Smurf watching?*) tribdog's reply where he has links to all the other photos in alphabetical order, there's no need to dig through all the older photos because he gathered them all in one post.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
Okidoki,

gotcha!

That´s what happens when you´re new to a community. :blushing:

Woh, you guys are quite active posters! I wish there was such a community about Psychology!
 
  • #63
nfsh said:
Okidoki,

gotcha!

That´s what happens when you´re new to a community. :blushing:

Woh, you guys are quite active posters! I wish there was such a community about Psychology!

Unfortunately, our social sciences area (we don't have many people in that area, so all the social sciences are generally lumped together) has been horribly over-taken by threads about IQ, but threads on other areas of psychology would be VERY welcome if you'd like to get involved there (Pleeeeeeeease!). Though, if you're dealing with psychosomatic "illnesses" you might want to visit our biology area as well (my research overlaps with behavioral neuroscience, so I interact with both biologists and psychologists). If it feels a little too lonely there, invite some friends to join. The more the merrier! :smile:
 
  • #64
nfsh said:
PhD-thesis on the psychosomatic sequelae of secrecy
You study what? :eek: You sure sound like a scientist :wink:
There is a really broad audience here so enjoy :biggrin:
 
  • #65
Monique said:
You study what? :eek: You sure sound like a scientist :wink:
There is a really broad audience here so enjoy :biggrin:

:smile: I'm going to take a guess at what it meant...keeping secrets is stressful, and s/he's studying the consequences to our health of keeping secrets.
 
  • #66
Moonbear said:
if you're dealing with psychosomatic "illnesses" you might want to visit our biology area
If, on the other hand, you would care to branch out into abnormal psychology, just stay right here and you'll run into more than you can process in a lifetime. :biggrin:
 
  • #67
Monique said:
You study what? :eek: You sure sound like a scientist :wink:

Just fancy words to say that I am interested in the question if having secrets might have effects on your body. That´s all! :smile:
 
  • #68
nfsh said:
Just fancy words to say that I am interested in the question if having secrets might have effects on your body. That´s all! :smile:

See, now this is something we can get into in the social sciences area. Are there good and bad secrets (I'm thinking something like the fun inside joke a married couple might share and gives them a reason to laugh together at something nobody else finds funny vs a secret you can't tell anyone because it would get you or someone else in trouble if anyone found out)?

And if you're studying secrets, how do you know people have them? If they tell you, it's not a secret anymore, is it? :-p
 
  • #69
Moonbear said:
If they tell you, it's not a secret anymore, is it? :-p
So how many people can know about it before it's no longer considered a secret? 1... 2... the Pentagon...?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K