High School The average value of S operator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The average value of the S operator in quantum mechanics, specifically in the context of spin-orbit coupling as discussed in David Griffith's "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics," is the projection of S onto J. The fine-structure Hamiltonian is defined as H = A∇L · ∇S. The commutator [H, ∇S] results in iA∇S × ∇L, which can be expressed as iA∇S × ∇J due to the relationship ∇J = ∇L + ∇S. Applying the Ehrenfest theorem leads to the time evolution equation for the average value of S, indicating that only the perpendicular component of S exhibits time dependence, akin to the precession of a spinning top.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly spin and angular momentum.
  • Familiarity with the Ehrenfest theorem and its application in quantum mechanics.
  • Knowledge of vector algebra and cross products in the context of quantum operators.
  • Basic comprehension of Hamiltonians in quantum systems, specifically fine-structure Hamiltonians.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Ehrenfest theorem in detail to understand its implications in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about the mathematical formulation of angular momentum operators in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the concept of spin-orbit coupling and its significance in atomic physics.
  • Investigate the dynamics of precession in quantum systems and its relation to classical mechanics.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, physicists studying atomic structure, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of spin dynamics and precession in quantum systems.

Viona
Messages
49
Reaction score
12
TL;DR
Why the average value of S operator is considered to be the projection of S onto J ?
While reading in the book of Introduction to Quantum Mechanics by David Griffith in the section of Fine structure of Hydrogen: spin- orbit coupling, he said that the average value of S operator is considered to be the projection of S onto J. I could not understand why he assumed that. please help me to understand.
Untitled.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Given the fine-structure Hamiltonian ##H = A\vec{L} \cdot \vec{S}##, try to calculate the commutator ##[H,\vec{S}]##. What do you get, in vector form?
 
What I was getting at is that if you do the algebra, I get $$[H,\vec{S}] = iA\vec{S} \times \vec{L} = iA\vec{S} \times \vec{J}$$ where the last step is true because ##\vec{J} = \vec{L} + \vec{S}##. Use the Ehrenfest theorem on this to get $$\frac{d\langle \vec{S} \rangle}{dt} = \frac{A}{\hbar} \langle \vec{S} \times \vec{J} \rangle $$

##\vec{S}## can be split into two components: ##S_{||}## which is parallel to ##\vec{J}## and ##\vec{S}_{\perp}## which is perpendicular to ##\vec{J}##. Since the cross product cancels the parallel part, only the perpendicular part has time dependence (it precesses). The equation for ##\langle \vec{S}_{\perp} \rangle## is the equation for a spinning top (precession). The time averaged value of ##\vec{S}_{\perp}## is zero.
 
Thank you all for useful replies.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
935
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
953
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K