MHB The Benefits of Learning a Second Language

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lorena_Santoro
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Language
Lorena_Santoro
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
This may not be the simplest way to do it but the first thing I would do is do the algebra: 1/x- 1/sin(x)= sin(x)/xsin(x)- x/xsin(x)= (sin(x)- x)/xsin(x). Now use L'hopital. The derivative of sin(x)- x is cos(x)- 1 and the derivative of xsin(x) is sin(x)+ xcos(x). Both of those is 0 at x= 0 so do it again. Differentiating cos(x)-1 gives -sin(x). Differentiating sin(x)+ xcos(x) gives cos(x)+ cos(x)- xsin(x)= 2cos(x)-xsin(x). Finally, the numerator goes to 0 while the denominator goes to 2.

The limit is 0.
 
Country Boy said:
This may not be the simplest way to do it but the first thing I would do is do the algebra: 1/x- 1/sin(x)= sin(x)/xsin(x)- x/xsin(x)= (sin(x)- x)/xsin(x). Now use L'hopital. The derivative of sin(x)- x is cos(x)- 1 and the derivative of xsin(x) is sin(x)+ xcos(x). Both of those is 0 at x= 0 so do it again. Differentiating cos(x)-1 gives -sin(x). Differentiating sin(x)+ xcos(x) gives cos(x)+ cos(x)- xsin(x)= 2cos(x)-xsin(x). Finally, the numerator goes to 0 while the denominator goes to 2.

The limit is 0.

Indeed. This might not be the simplest way to go around it but it's really creative! Thanks and would be even greater if you comment below the video on Youtube so others can also get to know your way of solving it.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top