- 48,855
- 24,963
rjbeery said:I believe the essence of the issue boils down to the concept of a "flowing now".
Okay, so what is your rigorous definition of this concept?
rjbeery said:Your argument is basically dodging the question
No, your post is dodging the question, by failing to give a rigorous definition of the concept that you said was the essence of the issue, after you had just said that rigorous definitions were needed. If you try to give your concept of a "flowing now" a rigorous definition, you will run right up against the issues I identified in the article.