Insights PF's policy on Lorentz Ether Theory and Block Universe - Comments

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the compatibility of Lorentz Ether Theory (LET) and Block Universe with various philosophical interpretations, emphasizing that these interpretations do not affect experimental predictions. It highlights the lack of significant debate among physicists regarding these theories compared to quantum mechanics interpretations. The conversation suggests that while philosophical interpretations may seem unnecessary, they can inspire future theoretical developments. Participants argue against banning discussions on interpretations, advocating for open dialogue to enhance understanding. Overall, the thread underscores the importance of distinguishing between theory and interpretation in physics.
  • #61
The OP comes across as setting up BU as an alternative to LET. I always thought of BU as an alternative to Presentism (a sliding "now"). LET, meanwhile posits the existence of a medium, a different issue altogether, as it can exist (or not) in but BU and Presentism.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
OJ Bernander said:
The OP comes across as setting up BU as an alternative to LET. I always thought of BU as an alternative to Presentism (a sliding "now"). LET, meanwhile posits the existence of a medium, a different issue altogether, as it can exist (or not) in but BU and Presentism.
Fair enough, but both present the same moderation challenge so are covered by the same policy - and this thread is about the policy.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters and OJ Bernander

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 146 ·
5
Replies
146
Views
16K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
Replies
90
Views
9K