The Bloom Box: Could it Power Our Homes? | CBS 60 Minutes Report

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Bloom Box, developed by Bloom Energy, is a solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) technology that claims to provide an efficient alternative energy source for homes and businesses. Major companies like Google, eBay, and Walmart are already utilizing the industrial version of this technology. While the Bloom Box reportedly uses half the natural gas (NG) of conventional combustion turbines, its efficiency claims remain under scrutiny, with no evidence of exceeding 50% efficiency. The discussion highlights concerns about the practicality of residential use and the long-term costs associated with maintenance and energy pricing.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of solid oxide fuel cells (SOFC) technology
  • Knowledge of energy conversion efficiency metrics
  • Familiarity with natural gas as an energy source
  • Awareness of current energy generation technologies and their efficiencies
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the efficiency ratings of various fuel cell technologies, including SOFC and PEMFC
  • Explore the economic implications of Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) in energy production
  • Investigate the environmental impact of natural gas versus renewable energy sources
  • Examine case studies of companies using Bloom Energy technology and their cost savings
USEFUL FOR

Energy analysts, environmental engineers, business decision-makers in energy sectors, and anyone interested in alternative energy solutions and their practical applications.

  • #31
Ah, Topher's ~right. I was focused on hydrogen fueled http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton_exchange_membrane_fuel_cell" fuel cells in which the reformer, if used, is a separate system. SOFC's like Bloom's directly process light hydrocarbons because the anode has two roles: i) oxidization of hydrogen using oxygen ions diffusing through the stack, and also ii) catalytic reforming of light hydrocarbons into hydrogen, i.e. a catalytic reformer is intrinsic to an SOFC.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #32


mheslep said:
In one includes the reformer, I believe that's high by 10-15%.

In this interview with the inventor, K.R. Sridhar, he says there is no need for a reformer in his fuel cell. He does a crystal clear job of answering many of the issues brought up here. It can apparently also run on pure hydrogen. The interview is on youtube at the following address:

youtube.com/watch?v=uVZAT3U_Jls&feature=player_embedded
 
Last edited:
  • #33


robert_13 said:
In this interview with the inventor, K.R. Sridhar, he says there is no need for a reformer in his fuel cell. He does a crystal clear job of answering many of the issues brought up here. It can apparently also run on pure hydrogen. The interview is on youtube at the following address:

youtube.com/watch?v=uVZAT3U_Jls&feature=player_embedded
I've seen it. Sridhar says there is no need for an *external* reformer. When the fuel is methane, he states that internal to the device "methane and water react" to form syngas, which is called methane reforming.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
9K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
20K
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K