The Bohr Radius and reduced mass

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the Bohr radius and energy of the ground state of hydrogen when the electron is replaced by a muon, which has a mass 207 times that of the electron. The correct approach involves using the concept of reduced mass, defined as μ = (m_μ * m_p) / (m_p + m_μ), where m_μ is the mass of the muon and m_p is the mass of the proton. The final calculations yield a radius of 2.8473 x 10^-13 meters and an energy of -4.05134 x 10^-16 J, demonstrating the significant impact of using reduced mass in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Bohr model of the atom
  • Familiarity with the concept of reduced mass
  • Knowledge of fundamental physics equations related to atomic structure
  • Basic grasp of particle physics, specifically muons and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Bohr model using reduced mass
  • Explore the differences in atomic structure calculations between electrons and heavier particles like muons
  • Learn about the implications of using reduced mass in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the properties and applications of muons in particle physics
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in physics, particularly those focusing on atomic and particle physics, as well as anyone interested in advanced calculations involving the Bohr model and reduced mass concepts.

squelch
Gold Member
Messages
56
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A muon is a particle with a charge equal to that of an electron and a mass equal to 207 times the mass of an electron. What is the radius and energy of the ground state of hydrogen if the electron is replaced with a muon? Don't forget to use the concept of reduced mass.

Homework Equations



\begin{array}{l}<br /> r = \frac{{4\pi {\varepsilon _0}{\hbar ^2}{n^2}}}{{m{e^2}}}\\<br /> {E_n} = - \frac{{m{e^4}}}{{2{{(4\pi {\varepsilon _0})}^2}{\hbar ^2}{n^2}}}\\<br /> \mu = \frac{1}{{\frac{1}{{{m_1}}} + \frac{1}{{{m_2}}}}} = \frac{{{m_1}{m_2}}}{{{m_1} + {m_2}}}<br /> \end{array}

The Attempt at a Solution



For the ground state, n=1. To find this hypothetical radius, it seems we simply substitute the mass of the muon in for the mass of the electron, which yields r = 2.53528x10^-13 meters, or 0.0048 the Bohr radius. Similarly for the energy.

However, I'm not precisely sure what to do with the reduced mass. The reduced mass seems to be a product if the mass of both a proton and electron -- is it more appropriate to substitute this reduced mass in for the mass of the electron given the parameters of the problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the "correct" derivation of the Bohr model, you have to consider that both the nucleus and the electron can move. Just as in classical physics, you then find that the motion can be separated into two parts, the center-of-mass motion and the relative motion of the two particles. It is the latter that give rise to the equations for the Bohr orbits. What enters in these equations is the reduced mass of the system proton + electron. However, since the mass of the proton is much greater than that of the electron, you can approximate
$$
\mu = \frac{m_p m_e}{m_p + m_e} \approx \frac{m_p m_e}{m_p} = m_e
$$
So you will find in all equations the mass of the electron, which is the same result you get if you start the derivation by assuming that the nucleus is fixed.

You can check for yourself how good this approximation is if you replace the mass of the electron by that of the muon.
 
So is it appropriate to simply take the reduced mass of a muon and use that in place of the mass of the electron in both equations?
 
squelch said:
So is it appropriate to simply take the reduced mass of a muon and use that in place of the mass of the electron in both equations?
I don't understand what you mean, as there is no such thing as "the reduced mass of a muon." The reduced mass requires two particles.
 
DrClaude said:
I don't understand what you mean, as there is no such thing as "the reduced mass of a muon." The reduced mass requires two particles.

Well, that makes a bit more sense. I suppose I should ask if I simply substitute the reduced mass \mu = \frac{{{m_{{\mu ^ - }}}{m_p}}}{{{m_p} + {m_{{\mu ^ - }}}}}

...in place of m in the equations for the Bohr radius and energy.
 
squelch said:
Well, that makes a bit more sense. I suppose I should ask if I simply substitute the reduced mass \mu = \frac{{{m_{{\mu ^ - }}}{m_p}}}{{{m_p} + {m_{{\mu ^ - }}}}}

...in place of m in the equations for the Bohr radius and energy.
Yes, that's what you should do.
 
Alrighty.

Calculating using the reduced mass, I find:
\begin{array}{l}<br /> r = 2.8473 \times {10^{ - 13}}m\\<br /> E = - 4.05134 \times {10^{ - 16}}J<br /> \end{array}

Thanks for the help.
 
If you care about precision, you have to do the same for the electron, but there the difference between particle mass and reduced mass is much smaller (about 1/2000, while it is about 1/9 for the muon).
 
mfb said:
If you care about precision, you have to do the same for the electron, but there the difference between particle mass and reduced mass is much smaller (about 1/2000, while it is about 1/9 for the muon).

I'm not sure precisely what you mean. There's only one parameter in each equation for mass that I can see.
 
  • #10
The difference between electron mass and the reduced mass for the electron/proton system is small.
The difference between muon mass and the reduced mass for the muon/proton system is significant.
 
  • #11
mfb said:
The difference between electron mass and the reduced mass for the electron/proton system is small.
The difference between muon mass and the reduced mass for the muon/proton system is significant.

Oh. Are you just saying that were I to calculate the Bohr radius for an actual hydrogen atom I should use the reduced mass of the electron/proton system to get a higher degree of precision, and that failing to use the reduced mass in the muon/proton system introduces a greater degree of imprecision than it might in the electron/proton system?

I'm sorry, I just wanted to sort of restate it in words I understand to make sure I'm getting my mind around what you're explaining.
 
  • #12
squelch said:
Oh. Are you just saying that were I to calculate the Bohr radius for an actual hydrogen atom I should use the reduced mass of the electron/proton system to get a higher degree of precision, and that failing to use the reduced mass in the muon/proton system introduces a greater degree of imprecision than it might in the electron/proton system?
Right.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K