MHB The Category Grp - Aluffi - Section 3.3 - basic question/clarification

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Section
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Paolo Aluffi's book, Algebra: Chapter 0.

I am studying Chapter II: Groups, first encounter. In Section 3 of this chapter, Aluffi deals with the category Grp in which the objects are groups and the morphisms are group homomorphisms.

Section 3,3, which is a pause for reflection, reads as follows:View attachment 2668

I am somewhat confused by the specific function described in that Aluffi writes:

$$ i_G \: \ G \to G , \ \ i(g) := g^{-1} $$.I have two rather simple questions:

1. Why do we have $$ i_G $$ in one place and $$ i $$ in the other - that is, shouldn't the above read $$ i_G \: \ G \to G , \ \ i_G(g) := g^{-1} $$?

2. Aluffi mentions both the identity element and inverses, but the function he considers seems to only deal with inverses? What is going on?

I realize that these are pretty simple issues, but would appreciate someone clarifying the situation for me.

Peter

***EDIT*** I have been reflecting on the above and now feel, regarding question 2 above, that I misunderstood what Aluffi was saying - the function specified only referred to inverses.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
1. Yes. But the map $i$ and $m$ as well are defined the same way for all groups $G$, so no confusion should occur.

2. The point is: any SEMI-GROUP homomorphism between groups is also a group homomorphism, since for any homomorphism:

$\varphi: G \to G'$

we have:

$\varphi(e_G) = e_{G'}$

$\varphi(g^{-1}) = [\varphi(g)]^{-1}$

which high-lights something about "group-ness", just preserving the map $m$ (in the sense that:

$\varphi \circ m_G = m_{G'} \circ (\varphi \times \varphi)$)

ensures that $\varphi$ preserves $i$ and $e$ (which we can think of as a "special" map $e:1 \to G$):

$\varphi \circ i_G = i_{G'} \circ \varphi$

$\varphi \circ e_G = e_{G'}$

To see why this is special, note that a similar assertion is NOT TRUE for monoids: a semi-group homomorphism between monoids does NOT necessarily preserve the identity, and this condition must be stipulated as an additional condition to have a monoid homomorphism.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Back
Top