MHB The Category of Pointed Sets .... Awodey Example 1.8, Page 17 ....

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Example Sets
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on clarifying the category of pointed sets as presented in Steve Awodey's "Category Theory." In this category, objects are defined as pairs consisting of a set and a designated point from that set, such as (X, a). Morphisms between these objects are functions that map one pointed set to another while preserving the designated points, meaning if f maps (A, a) to (B, b), then f(a) must equal b. The identity morphism in this category corresponds to the identity function on the set while maintaining the designated point. Overall, understanding pointed sets involves recognizing their structure as pairs and the specific nature of morphisms that respect these pairs.
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Steve Awodey's book: Category Theory (Second Edition) and am focused on Section 1.6 Constructions on Categories ...

I need some further help in order to fully understand some further aspects of Example 1.8, Page 17 ... ...

Example 1.8, Page 17 ... reads as follows:View attachment 8351I find the description of the category of pointed sets confusing ... never mind the isomorphism with the coslice category mentioned ...

Can someone clarify the category of pointed sets for me ... simply speaking, what are the objects, what are the arrows, what is the identity arrow, etc Hope someone can help ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The "category of pointed sets" is pretty much explained in the given definition: each member is a pair, a set together with a specified member of that set. If X= {a, b, c} is a set (so is in the "category of sets") then (X, a)= ({a, b, c}, a) is a member of the "category of pointed sets". (A, b) and (A, c) are other members. If Y= {p, q, r, s} is another set then (Y, p), (Y, q), (Y, r), and (Y, s) are still other members. An example or a "morphism" on this category might take (X, a) to (Y, q) or to (X, b). The "forgetful functor" from the "category of pointed sets" to the "category or sets" take each or (X, a), (X, b), and (X, c) to X and takes each of (Y, p), (Y, q), (Y, r), and (Y, s) to Y, "forgetting" the distinct point.

(A common error in learning category theory is trying to 'read too much' into the definitions. It is simpler than you think!)
 
What are "members" ? Do you mean objects ?

What about arrows or morphisms ? How are they defined ?
 
steenis said:
What are "members" ? Do you mean objects ?

What about arrows or morphisms ? How are they defined ?
Hmmm ... thanks for the help Country Boy and Steenis ...

But I still feel a bit confused ...

I take it that the objects of $$\text{Sets}_\ast$$ are of the form $$(A,a)$$ and $$(B,b)$$ where $$A$$ and $$B$$ are sets and $$a$$ and $$b$$ are specially selected elements of $$a,b$$ respectively, called "points" ... ...

But the arrows, namely $$f : (A,a) \to (B,b)$$, confuse me a bit because they seem to be defined in terms of the category Sets and so are not really clearly defined in $$\text{Sets}_\ast$$ ... ...

And then there is the question of the identity arrow ...Can someone please clarify the above ..

Peter
***EDIT***

Just been reflecting on my post above ... ...

Maybe I should just relax ... :) ... and accept that a new category can be legitimately defined in terms of the objects and arrows of an established category ... ?Peter
 
Last edited:
In the category "Sets", an object is a set A or a set B and a morphism is a function, f, from set A to set B. In the category "Pointed Sets", an object is a pair, (A, p), where p is a set and p is a point in A or a pair (B, q). A morphism is a function, f, from set A to set B such that f(p)= q.
 
Country Boy said:
In the category "Sets", an object is a set A or a set B and a morphism is a function, f, from set A to set B. In the category "Pointed Sets", an object is a pair, (A, p), where p is a set and p is a point in A or a pair (B, q). A morphism is a function, f, from set A to set B such that f(p)= q.

Thanks Country Boy ...

I appreciate all your help ...

Thanks again ...

Peter
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K