MHB The Category of Pointed Sets .... Awodey Example 1.8, Page 17 ....

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Example Sets
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Steve Awodey's book: Category Theory (Second Edition) and am focused on Section 1.6 Constructions on Categories ...

I need some further help in order to fully understand some further aspects of Example 1.8, Page 17 ... ...

Example 1.8, Page 17 ... reads as follows:View attachment 8351I find the description of the category of pointed sets confusing ... never mind the isomorphism with the coslice category mentioned ...

Can someone clarify the category of pointed sets for me ... simply speaking, what are the objects, what are the arrows, what is the identity arrow, etc Hope someone can help ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The "category of pointed sets" is pretty much explained in the given definition: each member is a pair, a set together with a specified member of that set. If X= {a, b, c} is a set (so is in the "category of sets") then (X, a)= ({a, b, c}, a) is a member of the "category of pointed sets". (A, b) and (A, c) are other members. If Y= {p, q, r, s} is another set then (Y, p), (Y, q), (Y, r), and (Y, s) are still other members. An example or a "morphism" on this category might take (X, a) to (Y, q) or to (X, b). The "forgetful functor" from the "category of pointed sets" to the "category or sets" take each or (X, a), (X, b), and (X, c) to X and takes each of (Y, p), (Y, q), (Y, r), and (Y, s) to Y, "forgetting" the distinct point.

(A common error in learning category theory is trying to 'read too much' into the definitions. It is simpler than you think!)
 
What are "members" ? Do you mean objects ?

What about arrows or morphisms ? How are they defined ?
 
steenis said:
What are "members" ? Do you mean objects ?

What about arrows or morphisms ? How are they defined ?
Hmmm ... thanks for the help Country Boy and Steenis ...

But I still feel a bit confused ...

I take it that the objects of $$\text{Sets}_\ast$$ are of the form $$(A,a)$$ and $$(B,b)$$ where $$A$$ and $$B$$ are sets and $$a$$ and $$b$$ are specially selected elements of $$a,b$$ respectively, called "points" ... ...

But the arrows, namely $$f : (A,a) \to (B,b)$$, confuse me a bit because they seem to be defined in terms of the category Sets and so are not really clearly defined in $$\text{Sets}_\ast$$ ... ...

And then there is the question of the identity arrow ...Can someone please clarify the above ..

Peter
***EDIT***

Just been reflecting on my post above ... ...

Maybe I should just relax ... :) ... and accept that a new category can be legitimately defined in terms of the objects and arrows of an established category ... ?Peter
 
Last edited:
In the category "Sets", an object is a set A or a set B and a morphism is a function, f, from set A to set B. In the category "Pointed Sets", an object is a pair, (A, p), where p is a set and p is a point in A or a pair (B, q). A morphism is a function, f, from set A to set B such that f(p)= q.
 
Country Boy said:
In the category "Sets", an object is a set A or a set B and a morphism is a function, f, from set A to set B. In the category "Pointed Sets", an object is a pair, (A, p), where p is a set and p is a point in A or a pair (B, q). A morphism is a function, f, from set A to set B such that f(p)= q.

Thanks Country Boy ...

I appreciate all your help ...

Thanks again ...

Peter
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top