Undergrad The CMB drag on an object moving through space

  • Thread starter Thread starter JimJCW
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cmb Drag Space
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) drag experienced by objects moving through space, specifically addressing the pressure drag caused by the thermalized photon gas of the CMB. The Earth, traveling at approximately 370 km/s relative to the CMB, experiences a measurable CMB dipole effect, with radiation in its direction appearing 0.35 mK hotter than the average temperature of 2.725 K. The conversation also clarifies that while CMB drag is significant for high-energy charged particles, it is negligible for photons due to minimal photon-photon interaction at CMB energies, as established by quantum electrodynamics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) radiation
  • Familiarity with thermalized photon gas concepts
  • Knowledge of quantum electrodynamics (QED)
  • Basic principles of radiation pressure
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of CMB dipole anisotropy on cosmology
  • Explore the effects of radiation pressure on celestial bodies
  • Study photon-photon scattering in quantum electrodynamics
  • Investigate the behavior of high-energy charged particles in the CMB
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, physicists, and researchers interested in cosmology, particularly those studying the effects of cosmic radiation on moving objects and the interactions of high-energy particles with the CMB.

JimJCW
Gold Member
Messages
208
Reaction score
40
An object moving through a fluid, such as the air, experiences a pressure drag caused by the difference in fluid pressure between the front and back surfaces of the object. Similarly, an object moving through a thermalized photon gas, such as the CMB, also experiences a drag. The cause in this case is that the object sees a blue shifted photon gas along the direction of motion and a redshifted one in the opposite direction (see Smith 1995, The drag on a sphere moving through a blackbody radiation bath). An example of this effect is the observed CMB dipole: The Earth travels at about 370 km/s relative to the CMB (see Planck 2018). In the all-sky map from the COBE satellite, radiation in the Earth's direction of motion appears 0.35 mK hotter than the average temperature, 2.725 K, while radiation on the opposite side of the sky is 0.35 mK cooler. The pressure of a thermalized photon gas is related to its temperature T by

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/288905

The observed CMB dipole, therefore, implies a radiation pressure difference between the two sides of the earth, causing a CMB drag on it. By plugging in suitable estimates of quantities involved, such as the cross-section of the Earth and the temperatures on the two sides, 2.725K + 0.35mK and 2.725K - 0.35mK, this drag can be estimated to be tiny,

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/288906

For comparison, please note that,

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/288908

For a photon traveling at 300,000 km/s through space, could there be a CMB drag too? How can we get some ideas about this?
 
Space news on Phys.org
JimJCW said:
For a photon traveling at 300,000 km/s through space, could there be a CMB drag too?
No. Photon-photon interaction is negligible at CMB energies. A photon is not a little billiard ball.
 
PeterDonis said:
No. Photon-photon interaction is negligible at CMB energies. A photon is not a little billiard ball.
Even if CMB photons did interact with one another, they'd just redistribute energy between one another, retaining the same thermal distribution. Drag doesn't make sense here, because drag implies a loss of energy. If CMB photons did interact, any "lost" energy in such an interaction would end up being picked up by another CMB photon.

So even if they did behave like billiard balls, drag still wouldn't make sense.

Drag from the CMB does make sense, however, when considering very high-energy particles, especially charged particles.
 
  • Informative
Likes Delta2
kimbyd said:
Even if CMB photons did interact with one another, they'd just redistribute energy between one another, retaining the same thermal distribution. Drag doesn't make sense here, because drag implies a loss of energy. If CMB photons did interact, any "lost" energy in such an interaction would end up being picked up by another CMB photon.

Drag from the CMB does make sense, however, when considering very high-energy particles, especially charged particles.

We are considering an optical photon traveling through the CMB photon gas, similar to what you said, “Drag from the CMB does make sense, however, when considering very high-energy particles, …” In the present case, by drag, I mean that on the optical photon.

Photon-photon scattering is allowed by quantum electrodynamics through virtual electron-positron pair. The interaction between the traveling photon and the photon gas is, therefore, unavoidable when it travels through the CMB; the question is how much. PeterDonis thinks it is negligible.
 
  • Sad
Likes weirdoguy
JimJCW said:
We are considering an optical photon traveling through the CMB photon gas, similar to what you said, “Drag from the CMB does make sense, however, when considering very high-energy particles, …” In the present case, by drag, I mean that on the optical photon.

Photon-photon scattering is allowed by quantum electrodynamics through virtual electron-positron pair. The interaction between the traveling photon and the photon gas is, therefore, unavoidable when it travels through the CMB; the question is how much. PeterDonis thinks it is negligible.
I found this:

https://inspirehep.net/files/4aa16cf428ef41062d0fafa026485c01
 
JimJCW said:
Photon-photon scattering
We've been through this before in your previous, now locked, thread. There's more scattering in the lens of your eye than in photon-photon scattering in the entire universe.

Since you clearly don't believe the answers you are getting, I can only conclude you are not seeking information - you are instead pushing your own personal theory.
 
  • Like
Likes weirdoguy
JimJCW said:
PeterDonis thinks it is negligible.
It's not a matter of what I personally think. As @Vanadium 50 has pointed out, we already discussed this in a previous thread of yours, which has been closed. So this thread is closed as well.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
8K
  • · Replies 72 ·
3
Replies
72
Views
9K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
17K