CMB, The Horizon Problem and a comment on BH's

In summary: Thanks for the question.What do you mean by remnant radiation? By definition, isn't CMB some remnant radiation that became separated from matter at a specific, early point in the universe's history?
  • #36
superg33k said:
Excellent. Thanks for going through this all with me. I'm happy to say the horizon problem makes sense.
Great! Happy to help.
Additionally I never realized that non-infamitory models required a constant rate of expansion of the scale factor, which makes sense also.
I hope I didn't say this! By definition, non-inflationary spacetimes need only satisfy [itex]\ddot{a}<0[/itex]. The scale factor in non-inflationary models is not necessarily constant -- for example, in a radiation dominated universe [itex]a(t) \sim t^{1/2}[/itex], whereas in a matter dominated one [itex]a(t) \sim t^{2/3}[/itex].
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #37
bapowell said:
I hope I didn't say this!

Yep, your right, you didn't. An inequality became an equality in my head.
 

Similar threads

  • Cosmology
2
Replies
57
Views
3K
  • Cosmology
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
27
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Back
Top