B The collision of molecules during thermal expansion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion regarding molecular collisions during thermal expansion in liquids and gases. It explains that while increasing temperature causes molecules to move further apart, leading to decreased density, the average kinetic energy of the molecules also increases. This results in more frequent collisions in certain scenarios, particularly in gases under constant pressure, while in others, such as a sealed container, the collision rate may decrease. The importance of context and specific conditions is emphasized, as different scenarios yield different outcomes regarding collision frequency. The conversation highlights the need for clarity in textbook explanations regarding these physical principles.
LHeilua6000
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
I am confused about why the collision of molecules will be more frequent in thermal expansion even though there are more spaces between molecules.
Greetings everyone.
I learned that the distance between molecules in liquid increases while the temperature increases. Hence, its density is decreased. The process is thermal expansion. At the same time, the collision between molecules would be more frequent when the temperature increases.
My Confusion: Since the distance between molecules increases, there are more spaces between molecules. Thus, they are less likely to collide with their neighboring molecules during their random motion. Therefore, I am confused about why the collision will be more frequent in thermal expansion?
 
Science news on Phys.org
How do you know that the collisions will be more frequent? What parameter measures this "frequency"?
 
LHeilua6000 said:
TL;DR Summary: I am confused about why the collision of molecules will be more frequent in thermal expansion even though there are more spaces between molecules.

Greetings everyone.
I learned that the distance between molecules in liquid increases while the temperature increases. Hence, its density is decreased. The process is thermal expansion. At the same time, the collision between molecules would be more frequent when the temperature increases.
My Confusion: Since the distance between molecules increases, there are more spaces between molecules. Thus, they are less likely to collide with their neighboring molecules during their random motion. Therefore, I am confused about why the collision will be more frequent in thermal expansion?
You understand that there is a difference between a liquid and a gas consisting of small particles, right?

Details matter. We need to agree on a scenario.

Let us restrict our attention to the case of a more or less ideal gas consisting of a bunch of small particles in a large space bouncing elastically from one another and from the container walls. Liquids are more complicated than that.

If you increase temperature (increasing the average energy of the particles) then you will find that in order to hold pressure constant you will have to allow the gas to expand. It will become less dense. The distance between particles will increase.

Is this the scenario you wish to discuss? Let us assume so.

So now we have this less dense, higher temperature, same pressure gas. We can ask: "is the collision rate of particles now more frequent, less or the same"?

It should be less frequent. Consider a container wall. It is subject, by the properties of the scenario, to the same pressure as before. But each time a particle hits the wall, that particle imparts greater momentum than before. It follows that the rate of collisions must be less than before.

On the other hand, we could be talking about a different scenario. We have a sealed container. We light a flame under it, increasing the temperature of the enclosed gas.

Is this the scenario you wish to discuss? Let us assume so.

Now we have this equally dense, higher temperature, higher pressure gas. We can ask: "is the collision rate of molecules now more frequent, less or same"? The answer should be more frequent this time.

On yet another hand, we could be talking about a different scenario. We have a container with a piston restrained by a spring. We light a flame under the container. The gas heats up and expands, causing the piston to move outward against the spring.

Is this the scenario you with to discuss? Let us assume so.

Now we have this less dense, higher temperature, somewhat higher pressure gas. We can ask: "is the collision rate of particles now more frequent, less or same"? The answer should be that it depends on the spring constant. A very loose spring and it is scenario 1: Less frequent. A very stiff spring and it is scenario 2: More frequent.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71, nasu and gmax137
jbriggs444 said:
You understand that there is a difference between a liquid and a gas consisting of small particles, right?

Details matter. We need to agree on a scenario.

Let us restrict our attention to the case of a more or less ideal gas consisting of a bunch of small particles in a large space bouncing elastically from one another and from the container walls. Liquids are more complicated than that.

If you increase temperature (increasing the average energy of the particles) then you will find that in order to hold pressure constant you will have to allow the gas to expand. It will become less dense. The distance between particles will increase.

Is this the scenario you wish to discuss? Let us assume so.

So now we have this less dense, higher temperature, same pressure gas. We can ask: "is the collision rate of particles now more frequent, less or the same"?

It should be less frequent. Consider a container wall. It is subject, by the properties of the scenario, to the same pressure as before. But each time a particle hits the wall, that particle imparts greater momentum than before. It follows that the rate of collisions must be less than before.

On the other hand, we could be talking about a different scenario. We have a sealed container. We light a flame under it, increasing the temperature of the enclosed gas.

Is this the scenario you wish to discuss? Let us assume so.

Now we have this equally dense, higher temperature, higher pressure gas. We can ask: "is the collision rate of molecules now more frequent, less or same"? The answer should be more frequent this time.

On yet another hand, we could be talking about a different scenario. We have a container with a piston restrained by a spring. We light a flame under the container. The gas heats up and expands, causing the piston to move outward against the spring.

Is this the scenario you with to discuss? Let us assume so.

Now we have this less dense, higher temperature, somewhat higher pressure gas. We can ask: "is the collision rate of particles now more frequent, less or same"? The answer should be that it depends on the spring constant. A very loose spring and it is scenario 1: Less frequent. A very stiff spring and it is scenario 2: More frequent.
Thanks for your explanation! In fact, my confusion occurs from an explanation in a textbook. The textbook state that when the temperature of Liquids increases, the average kinetic energy particles incease. Hence, the collision of molecules will be more frequent.
 
Which textbook? Do they write, what are the precise conditions for the liquid? If not, it's pretty impossible to make sense of their statement.
 
I need to calculate the amount of water condensed from a DX cooling coil per hour given the size of the expansion coil (the total condensing surface area), the incoming air temperature, the amount of air flow from the fan, the BTU capacity of the compressor and the incoming air humidity. There are lots of condenser calculators around but they all need the air flow and incoming and outgoing humidity and then give a total volume of condensed water but I need more than that. The size of the...
Thread 'Why work is PdV and not (P+dP)dV in an isothermal process?'
Let's say we have a cylinder of volume V1 with a frictionless movable piston and some gas trapped inside with pressure P1 and temperature T1. On top of the piston lay some small pebbles that add weight and essentially create the pressure P1. Also the system is inside a reservoir of water that keeps its temperature constant at T1. The system is in equilibrium at V1, P1, T1. Now let's say i put another very small pebble on top of the piston (0,00001kg) and after some seconds the system...
Back
Top