The correct usage of self driving cars in SF

  • Thread starter Thread starter Czcibor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cars Self Sf
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the future usage of self-driving cars (SDVs) in San Francisco, focusing on their integration with existing transportation systems, social implications, and potential technological advancements. Participants explore various models of transportation, including the evolution of buses and the sharing economy, while considering the broader societal impacts of these changes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that SDVs could lead to a reduced need for car ownership, suggesting a shift towards a sharing economy where individuals hire cars as needed.
  • There is a discussion about the potential revolution in mass transit, with some arguing that traditional buses may struggle against the convenience of on-demand SDVs.
  • One participant suggests that rethinking the concept of buses as large carpools could enhance their efficiency and appeal, allowing for more flexible routing based on passenger demand.
  • Concerns are raised about the efficiency of buses compared to SDVs, particularly regarding wait times and the potential for increased traffic density if manual cars are banned.
  • Participants explore the idea of integrating SDVs into delivery services, envisioning small vehicles that could autonomously transport packages to users.
  • Subscription models for autotaxis are proposed, where users could pay for varying levels of service, including options that incorporate advertising to reduce costs.
  • Some ideas include specialized vehicles for different needs, such as medical transport or sleep cars for long-distance travel, highlighting the potential for tailored transportation solutions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the future of transportation with SDVs, with no clear consensus on the effectiveness of buses versus SDVs or the implications of a sharing economy. Multiple competing models and ideas are presented, indicating ongoing debate and uncertainty.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge various assumptions, such as the impact of traffic density and the efficiency of different transportation models. There are also references to external factors like net neutrality and social implications that remain unresolved.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to urban planners, transportation engineers, policymakers, and individuals interested in the future of mobility and the integration of technology in public transport systems.

  • #61
Ryan_m_b said:
There's a weird perception in this thread that an SDV either needs a complete manual override or will only accept commands by complicated sat nav. What makes you think there won't be a stop button that causes the car to pull over as soon as is safe? And touching a way point on a screen that's already zoomed to your surroundings is easy. I have navigation apps on my phone that allow me to do that in seconds.

I think that it will be hard to convince the transportation authorities that a vehicle will not have a form of manual override to drive the vehicle for any number of reasons.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
Loren said:
I think that it will be hard to convince the transportation authorities that a vehicle will not have a form of manual override to drive the vehicle for any number of reasons.
I think in a few decades it will be hard to convince the authorities to allow it (on public roads).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ryan_m_b
  • #63
Loren said:
I think that it will be hard to convince the transportation authorities that a vehicle will not have a form of manual override to drive the vehicle for any number of reasons.

http://www.thelocal.se/20151104/solar-storm-grounds-swedish-air-traffic

Until developed electronics can be so sensitive things, manual option shouldn't be removed entirely.
 
  • #64
Human drivers are very sensitive to fog, and we can use cars without an alternative to human drivers.
Automatic cars don't need radar.
 
  • #65
mfb said:
Human drivers are very sensitive to fog, and we can use cars without an alternative to human drivers.
Automatic cars don't need radar.
The link also said a solar storm can also affect Gps signals that is bad for nav system. It also said that households suffered blackouts so radar isn't the only thing could possibly go haywire.
I think it isn't impossible to aid a human driver with a lidar less sensitive to fog neither.
Of course there are different areas and applications. Highway long boring routine sure robocar superior. Robotaxi one already prepared to surrender control when use a taxi. City traffic, lots of possibly unexpected things can happen. I remember when i learned to drive, there was a really large hole in the asphalt, we rather went around it. Or i saw advertisement of lidar black paint to avoid plate recognition.
And there are backwater areas without address. I like to note i am not against robocars it is also ok if driving is illegal until get around hole manuever for example don't count as driving. Entirely remove human control from personal car that is something i dislike.
 
  • #66
GTOM said:
It also said that households suffered blackouts so radar isn't the only thing could possibly go haywire.
Right, the electricity grid can also be affected. Imagine some ironic comment here on the effect on driving cars.
GPS is necessary to determine the initial location and useful for occasional updates, but cars don't have to depend on it. They can read street signs just like a human can do.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ryan_m_b
  • #67
mfb said:
Right, the electricity grid can also be affected. Imagine some ironic comment here on the effect on driving cars.
GPS is necessary to determine the initial location and useful for occasional updates, but cars don't have to depend on it. They can read street signs just like a human can do.

I know the effect on a car is negligable compared to effect on long range radars and power lines, i wondered whether it is negligable on their most sensitive electronic parts?
Okay we can agree even if it were a problem it can be solved, and i also think the law someone must be in the driving seat can be erased.
The only problem i have if they want to entirely remove human ability to directly control the car.
Someone mentioned Rainbow End before, there was a scene where they wanted to reach an area, but car said no, can't stop here. Finally they solved it with a chainsaw like thing.

Reality can produce an almost infinite number of really weird things, in an unexpected situation, a program is even less able to find out something than an average human.

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-34754577 (Yes i know it isn't about cars, but unexpected situations.)

http://www.wired.com/2014/08/wireless-car-hack/
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 84 ·
3
Replies
84
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
15K