The correct usage of self driving cars in SF

  • Thread starter Thread starter Czcibor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cars Self Sf
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the future integration of self-driving cars (SDVs) in San Francisco, emphasizing their potential to reshape transportation dynamics. Increased monitoring and sharing economy models could reduce the need for car ownership, leading to fewer vehicles on the road and less demand for parking. SDVs could revolutionize mass transit by replacing traditional buses with flexible, on-demand carpooling services, although this may introduce congestion challenges. Additionally, SDVs could facilitate new uses such as package delivery and specialized transport for various needs. Overall, the conversation highlights the need for innovative regulations and infrastructure to accommodate these changes effectively.
  • #61
Ryan_m_b said:
There's a weird perception in this thread that an SDV either needs a complete manual override or will only accept commands by complicated sat nav. What makes you think there won't be a stop button that causes the car to pull over as soon as is safe? And touching a way point on a screen that's already zoomed to your surroundings is easy. I have navigation apps on my phone that allow me to do that in seconds.

I think that it will be hard to convince the transportation authorities that a vehicle will not have a form of manual override to drive the vehicle for any number of reasons.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
Loren said:
I think that it will be hard to convince the transportation authorities that a vehicle will not have a form of manual override to drive the vehicle for any number of reasons.
I think in a few decades it will be hard to convince the authorities to allow it (on public roads).
 
  • Like
Likes Ryan_m_b
  • #63
Loren said:
I think that it will be hard to convince the transportation authorities that a vehicle will not have a form of manual override to drive the vehicle for any number of reasons.

http://www.thelocal.se/20151104/solar-storm-grounds-swedish-air-traffic

Until developed electronics can be so sensitive things, manual option shouldn't be removed entirely.
 
  • #64
Human drivers are very sensitive to fog, and we can use cars without an alternative to human drivers.
Automatic cars don't need radar.
 
  • #65
mfb said:
Human drivers are very sensitive to fog, and we can use cars without an alternative to human drivers.
Automatic cars don't need radar.
The link also said a solar storm can also affect Gps signals that is bad for nav system. It also said that households suffered blackouts so radar isn't the only thing could possibly go haywire.
I think it isn't impossible to aid a human driver with a lidar less sensitive to fog neither.
Of course there are different areas and applications. Highway long boring routine sure robocar superior. Robotaxi one already prepared to surrender control when use a taxi. City traffic, lots of possibly unexpected things can happen. I remember when i learned to drive, there was a really large hole in the asphalt, we rather went around it. Or i saw advertisement of lidar black paint to avoid plate recognition.
And there are backwater areas without address. I like to note i am not against robocars it is also ok if driving is illegal until get around hole manuever for example don't count as driving. Entirely remove human control from personal car that is something i dislike.
 
  • #66
GTOM said:
It also said that households suffered blackouts so radar isn't the only thing could possibly go haywire.
Right, the electricity grid can also be affected. Imagine some ironic comment here on the effect on driving cars.
GPS is necessary to determine the initial location and useful for occasional updates, but cars don't have to depend on it. They can read street signs just like a human can do.
 
  • Like
Likes Ryan_m_b
  • #67
mfb said:
Right, the electricity grid can also be affected. Imagine some ironic comment here on the effect on driving cars.
GPS is necessary to determine the initial location and useful for occasional updates, but cars don't have to depend on it. They can read street signs just like a human can do.

I know the effect on a car is negligable compared to effect on long range radars and power lines, i wondered whether it is negligable on their most sensitive electronic parts?
Okay we can agree even if it were a problem it can be solved, and i also think the law someone must be in the driving seat can be erased.
The only problem i have if they want to entirely remove human ability to directly control the car.
Someone mentioned Rainbow End before, there was a scene where they wanted to reach an area, but car said no, can't stop here. Finally they solved it with a chainsaw like thing.

Reality can produce an almost infinite number of really weird things, in an unexpected situation, a program is even less able to find out something than an average human.

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-34754577 (Yes i know it isn't about cars, but unexpected situations.)

http://www.wired.com/2014/08/wireless-car-hack/
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 84 ·
3
Replies
84
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
15K