The direction of three forces acting on a line has to be concurrent?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Jason Ko
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Direction Forces
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the principle of concurrency in the context of three forces acting on a line. It is established that for a system to be in equilibrium, all three lines of action must intersect at a single point; otherwise, a net torque will occur. The participants reference a "simple" proof from a textbook that supports this conclusion, emphasizing the importance of understanding the geometric relationship between the forces.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with the concept of torque
  • Basic knowledge of equilibrium conditions in physics
  • Ability to interpret force diagrams
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the geometric conditions for equilibrium in static systems
  • Learn about torque calculations and their implications in physics
  • Examine the proofs related to force concurrency in textbooks
  • Explore applications of these principles in engineering mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, mechanical engineers, and anyone studying statics and dynamics in engineering contexts.

Jason Ko
Messages
21
Reaction score
6
TL;DR
I found this theorem in D. Morin's book on mechanics. How to prove it mathematically? Does it have a name?
1709042028580.jpeg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Take the point of crossing of two of the force lines of action. If the third line of action does not pass through that crossing, there is a net torque and therefore this cannot happen for a system in equilibrium.
 
Thanks! I was being stupid
 
Jason Ko said:
Thanks! I was being stupid
Probably you didn't read the "simple" proof provided below the statement that you highlighted in the textbook.
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Orodruin
kuruman said:
Probably you didn't read the "simple" proof provided below the statement that you highlighted in the textbook.
Nor I. Good thing I agree with Morin though … 😛
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
880
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K