The downfall of education in Australia

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers around a misconception expressed by a university lecturer in Australia regarding sound waves and destructive interference. The lecturer suggested that playing a sound backwards would cancel it out, demonstrating a lack of understanding of the principles of sound physics. The conversation emphasizes that while individual misunderstandings can occur, they do not reflect the overall quality of the Australian education system, which is characterized by reputable universities and a high literacy rate. The importance of continuous education for both educators and students is highlighted as essential for maintaining academic standards.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of sound wave physics and interference principles
  • Knowledge of destructive and constructive interference
  • Familiarity with speaker dynamics and sound propagation
  • Basic concepts of acoustics and room acoustics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of sound wave interference and its applications
  • Explore the effects of speaker placement on sound quality in acoustics
  • Learn about advanced sound engineering techniques for managing acoustics
  • Investigate the role of continuous professional development for educators in STEM fields
USEFUL FOR

Educators, sound engineers, physics students, and anyone interested in the principles of acoustics and sound wave behavior.

Adam
Messages
65
Reaction score
1
I'm not really debunking anything, but I didn't know where else to put this. One of the chaps I hang out with sometimes used to lecture computer science at a Melbourne university. He's done some physics of course - you must in such degrees. So we're all talking crap one day, and this fellow pipes up with the idea that playing a stream of sound backwards in opposition to the stream itself (ie. if you play Stairway backwards from point A while it is played normally from Point B), you cancel out the sound, so there is silence. I can only assume the person has absolutely no idea what destructive intereference is all about. A truly whacky idea, and this was from a university lecturer. Amazing but true!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since you took the time to tell the story I want to explain your objection a little more.

Firstly, it is possible to destructively interfere two sound waves at a point or along a mathematical surface, but the energy can not be cancelled. If the sound interferes destructively at one point, it must [by the demand for conservation of energy] likewise interfere constructively to the same degree at another point or over some volume [edit: or we at least need to sum the energy over all space in which case it all still adds]. Another way to say this is that both the inverted and primary waves each come with only positive energy.

Next, simply playing the stream backwards does not invert the signal. A one-to-one mapping of the incoming wave is needed; with a rarefied volume of air meeting a compressed volume of exactly equal and opposite magnitude. At some random point, if we take a freeze frame of the sound wave in the stream and look at the wave we see some value that we might call positive - let's say this is a push out for the speaker. Displacement at a point in the stream is still positive regardless of the direction from which it is approached. To create an inverted wave would require that all positive displacements are made negative – the speaker is pulled in instead of pushed out. This must track exactly throughout the entire stream. Then, it is only possible to hear this at a specific point or along some line.

If you have a large room handy, one way to get this effect [a little] is to simply reverse the polarity of the speakers. Then, by placing the speakers next to each other, if you stand in front of them at a distance of about six feet, a significant reduction in the bass can ususally be detected by ear. If you walk around the room you should be able to detect hot and cold spots. Moving the speakers around can create different regions in space in which the low frequencies tend to cancel. The same effect can be found without even reversing the wires. Note also that high frequencies are very difficult to cancel at a specific point. This requires very precise positioning of all elements in addition to damping of ambient sound. I imagine the dynamic response of the speaker begins to kill the effect at high frequencies. The phase opposition is not likely preserved.

I once played with some high frequency speakers and had some really interesting interference results from the 20KHz range. Being just at the upper frequency limit and the minimum amplitude limit for hearing, and with a wavelength of about 1/2 inch, as the 20KHz wave interferes with itself around the room, just a slight movement of one's head makes the sound audible or not. I could hear it as I sat, but if I turned my head only slightly the sound was completely inaudible.
 
Last edited:


First of all, I want to clarify that one individual's misunderstanding or incorrect idea does not represent the entire education system in Australia. While it is concerning that a university lecturer would have such a misconception, it is unfair to generalize and say that education in Australia is in a downfall.

Furthermore, it is important to recognize that education is a constantly evolving field and mistakes or misunderstandings can happen. However, it is the responsibility of educators to continuously educate themselves and stay updated on current information and research. It is also the responsibility of students to critically think and question information presented to them.

In this specific case, it seems that the lecturer in question may have lacked a thorough understanding of physics and how sound works. This does not reflect on the overall quality of education in Australia. In fact, Australia has a strong education system with highly ranked universities and a high literacy rate.

It is important to not let one anecdote overshadow the hard work and dedication of educators and students in Australia. There may be room for improvement in certain areas, but it is unfair to paint the entire education system in a negative light based on one individual's mistake. Let us instead focus on supporting and improving education in a constructive manner.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
8K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
39
Views
9K
  • · Replies 128 ·
5
Replies
128
Views
44K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K