The Drake Equation: Is there really other Life in the Universe?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PhysicsPost
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Life Universe
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the Drake Equation, which estimates the number of extraterrestrial civilizations capable of communication. While some participants express skepticism about its utility due to the highly variable nature of its parameters, others argue it provides a framework for understanding the vast potential for life in the universe. The conversation also touches on the challenges of searching for intelligent life, including the limitations of current technology and the possibility that advanced civilizations may not use radio signals. Additionally, there is a debate about the balance between optimism for discovering extraterrestrial life and the practicality of funding such searches. Ultimately, the Drake Equation serves as a catalyst for ongoing curiosity and exploration in the field of astrobiology.
  • #31
narrator said:
If time is a factor, for a viable planet to develop atmosphere, then organisms, then intelligent life, then advanced civilization... then we add the effect of gravity on time.. then perhaps the worlds closest to the gravity well at the centre of our galaxy would be further along the evolutionary/advancement scale.
:eek:
No. GR has a vanishingly small effect.
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #32
I think I recall a discussion here that our galaxy has a habitability zone where the conditions are more friendly to life. I had suggested that the older stars near the central hub would have older civilisations but there are also much higher levels of radiation around there.
 
  • #33
Tanelorn said:
I think I recall a discussion here that our galaxy has a habitability zone where the conditions are more friendly to life. I had suggested that the older stars near the central hub would have older civilisations but there are also much higher levels of radiation around there.

Also, all those Population III stars are much poorer in metals.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
7K
Replies
148
Views
12K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
7K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K