The eccentricity of binary stars' orbits

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the eccentricity of binary stars' orbits and its relationship to the reduced mass around the center of mass. It is established that the eccentricities of two stars in a binary system are identical due to their elliptical orbits being weighted mirror images of each other. The equations of motion demonstrate that the forces acting on the stars are equal and opposite, leading to a consistent relationship in their orbital characteristics. Additionally, the eccentricity of circumbinary planets is defined relative to the binary system's barycenter, with stability conditions ensuring elliptical orbits.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Third Law of Motion
  • Familiarity with orbital mechanics and Kepler's laws
  • Knowledge of reduced mass in two-body systems
  • Basic concepts of barycenters in celestial mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical derivation of reduced mass in binary systems
  • Learn about the stability criteria for circumbinary orbits
  • Explore the implications of Kepler's laws on binary star systems
  • Investigate the dynamics of non-inertial reference frames in celestial mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and students of celestial mechanics interested in binary star dynamics and the behavior of circumbinary planets.

shirin
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Hi
As two stars orbit their mutual center of mass in elliptical orbits, why are their eccentricity the same?
And why is it the same as the one of reduced mass around center of mass?

Thanks
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Their positions are weighted mirror images of each other:

x1 = - m2/(m1+m2) * x12
x2 = m1/(m1+m2) * x12
where
x12 = x2 - x1
and their center of mass is fixed:
m1*x1 + m2*x2 = 0

Let's now consider mutual interactions:

m1*d2(x1)/dt2 = - f
m2*d2(x2)/dt2 = + f

The forces are reversed in sign from Newton's Third Law, with the consequence that

d2(m1*x1+m2*x2)/dt2 = 0

Plug the formulas for x1 and x2 into these equations of motion, and one gets
mreduced*d2(x12)/dt2 = + f

where mreduced = m1*m2/(m1+m2)

Alternatively,

d2(x1)/dt2 = -(1/m1)*f
d2(x2)/dt2 = (1/m2)*f

with
d2(x12)/dt2 = (1/m1 + 1/m2)*f
 
thank you very much!
 
So, why are the eccentricities the same?
 
As I understood, the distance of M1 to CM, x1, is linearly proportional to the distance of M2 to CM, and also it is proportional to the distance between these two, x12.
Since x1 is an ellipse with eccentricity e1, its eccentricity remains constant, but its semimajor gets multiplied, when it is multiplied by a constant number. So we have a bigger/smaller ellipse with the same eccentricity.
 
Ok, I couldn't figure it out. Thanks a lot!
 
I am wondering how the eccentricity of a circumbinary (binary star system) planet is defined? To my knowledge Kepler elements, including e, are non-inertial elements. So, how is the planets eccentricity measured?
 
Well, the planet's orbit will have to be stable enough to be an ellipse, which assumes it's quite far away from the apoapsis distance of the stars (AFAIRemember >12*a).
Anyway, a circumbinary orbit should have it's Kepler elements defined w.r.t the binary system's barycenter.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DrToby

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K