I The electric field due to a dipole

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the derivation of equations related to dipole charges positioned along the z-axis. It highlights the transition from the radius equation to the squared terms involving z and d, emphasizing the simplification using 1D vector algebra. The dipole configuration is explained with charges Q and -Q, and the resulting electric field is derived from the superposition of their Coulomb fields. The conversation also touches on the electrostatic potential and its Taylor expansion, leading to the dipole potential expression. Ultimately, the discussion illustrates the mathematical steps to arrive at the dipole field equations.
wolly
Messages
49
Reaction score
2
asfa.PNG


and

uug.PNG

Can someone explain how they made these equations like this?
How did the radius become that equation?
What formulas from algebra did they applied?
I'm looking at these formulas and I don't understand how r=z+1/2*d
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The dipole charges are defined to be on the z axis at ##z=\pm d/2##. If I point out that your textbook is not using full-on vector algebra, so is working in 1d, can you see how to get from ##r^2## to ##(z\pm d/2)^2##?
 
From this little example, I can only come to the conclusion to recommend to use another book. SCNR.

The idea of the dipole is to have a charge ##Q## at ##(0,0,d/2)=d/2 \vec{e}_3## and ##-Q## at ##(0,0,-d/2)=-d/2 \vec{e}_3##. The field is given by the superposition of the field of these point charges (Coulomb fields), i.e.,
$$\vec{E}=\frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \left [\frac{\vec{r}-d/2 \vec{e}_3}{|(\vec{r}-d/2 \vec{e}_3|^3}-\frac{\vec{r}+d/2 \vec{e}_3}{|\vec{r}+d/2 \vec{e}_3|^3} \right].$$
The next step usually is to make ##d \rightarrow 0## while keeping ##Q d=\text{const}##. This leads to the dipole approximation of the field for this charge configuration. This is a somewhat cumbersome calculation, however.

It's easier to use the electrostatic potential:
$$\Phi(\vec{r},d)=\frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \left [\frac{1}{|\vec{r}-d/2 \vec{e}_3|} - \frac{1}{|\vec{r}+d/2 \vec{e}_3|} \right].$$
Now ##|\vec{r} \pm d/2 \vec{e}_3|=\sqrt{x_1^2 +x_2^2 + (x_3\pm d/2)}^2##.
The Taylor expansion of ##\Phi## wrt. ##d## is
$$\Phi(\vec{r},d)=\Phi(\vec{r},0) + d \partial_d \Phi(\vec{r},0)+\mathcal{O}(d^2) = d \partial_d \Phi(\vec{r},0)+\mathcal{O}(d^2).$$
This gives
$$\Phi(\vec{r},d)=\frac{Q d x_3}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r^3} + \mathcal{O}(Q d^2).$$
Defining the dipole moment
$$\vec{p}=Q d \vec{e}_3$$
Making now ##d \rightarrow 0## but keeping ##Q d=\text{const}## you get the dipole potential,
$$\Phi(\vec{r})=\frac{\vec{p} \cdot \vec{r}}{4 \pi \epsilon r^3}.$$
The field is
$$\vec{E}=-\vec{\nabla} \Phi=-\frac{\vec{p}}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r^3} + \frac{3 (\vec{p} \cdot \vec{r}) \vec{r}}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r^5} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r^5} [3 (\vec{r} \cdot \vec{p}) \vec{r}-r^2 \vec{p}].$$
 
Last edited:
Hello, I'm joining this forum to ask two questions which have nagged me for some time. I am in no way trolling. They both are presumed obvious, yet don't make sense to me. Nobody will explain their positions, which is...uh...aka science. I also have a thread for the other question. Yes, I'm questioning the most elementary physics question we're given in this world. The classic elevator in motion question: A person is standing on a scale in an elevator that is in constant motion...