Undergrad The electric field due to a dipole

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the derivation of equations related to dipole charges positioned along the z-axis. It highlights the transition from the radius equation to the squared terms involving z and d, emphasizing the simplification using 1D vector algebra. The dipole configuration is explained with charges Q and -Q, and the resulting electric field is derived from the superposition of their Coulomb fields. The conversation also touches on the electrostatic potential and its Taylor expansion, leading to the dipole potential expression. Ultimately, the discussion illustrates the mathematical steps to arrive at the dipole field equations.
wolly
Messages
49
Reaction score
2
asfa.PNG


and

uug.PNG

Can someone explain how they made these equations like this?
How did the radius become that equation?
What formulas from algebra did they applied?
I'm looking at these formulas and I don't understand how r=z+1/2*d
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The dipole charges are defined to be on the z axis at ##z=\pm d/2##. If I point out that your textbook is not using full-on vector algebra, so is working in 1d, can you see how to get from ##r^2## to ##(z\pm d/2)^2##?
 
From this little example, I can only come to the conclusion to recommend to use another book. SCNR.

The idea of the dipole is to have a charge ##Q## at ##(0,0,d/2)=d/2 \vec{e}_3## and ##-Q## at ##(0,0,-d/2)=-d/2 \vec{e}_3##. The field is given by the superposition of the field of these point charges (Coulomb fields), i.e.,
$$\vec{E}=\frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \left [\frac{\vec{r}-d/2 \vec{e}_3}{|(\vec{r}-d/2 \vec{e}_3|^3}-\frac{\vec{r}+d/2 \vec{e}_3}{|\vec{r}+d/2 \vec{e}_3|^3} \right].$$
The next step usually is to make ##d \rightarrow 0## while keeping ##Q d=\text{const}##. This leads to the dipole approximation of the field for this charge configuration. This is a somewhat cumbersome calculation, however.

It's easier to use the electrostatic potential:
$$\Phi(\vec{r},d)=\frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \left [\frac{1}{|\vec{r}-d/2 \vec{e}_3|} - \frac{1}{|\vec{r}+d/2 \vec{e}_3|} \right].$$
Now ##|\vec{r} \pm d/2 \vec{e}_3|=\sqrt{x_1^2 +x_2^2 + (x_3\pm d/2)}^2##.
The Taylor expansion of ##\Phi## wrt. ##d## is
$$\Phi(\vec{r},d)=\Phi(\vec{r},0) + d \partial_d \Phi(\vec{r},0)+\mathcal{O}(d^2) = d \partial_d \Phi(\vec{r},0)+\mathcal{O}(d^2).$$
This gives
$$\Phi(\vec{r},d)=\frac{Q d x_3}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r^3} + \mathcal{O}(Q d^2).$$
Defining the dipole moment
$$\vec{p}=Q d \vec{e}_3$$
Making now ##d \rightarrow 0## but keeping ##Q d=\text{const}## you get the dipole potential,
$$\Phi(\vec{r})=\frac{\vec{p} \cdot \vec{r}}{4 \pi \epsilon r^3}.$$
The field is
$$\vec{E}=-\vec{\nabla} \Phi=-\frac{\vec{p}}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r^3} + \frac{3 (\vec{p} \cdot \vec{r}) \vec{r}}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r^5} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r^5} [3 (\vec{r} \cdot \vec{p}) \vec{r}-r^2 \vec{p}].$$
 
Last edited:
Topic about reference frames, center of rotation, postion of origin etc Comoving ref. frame is frame that is attached to moving object, does that mean, in that frame translation and rotation of object is zero, because origin and axes(x,y,z) are fixed to object? Is it same if you place origin of frame at object center of mass or at object tail? What type of comoving frame exist? What is lab frame? If we talk about center of rotation do we always need to specified from what frame we observe?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
756
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
934
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K