The End of the Ski Jump - Optimizing Launch Angle

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a ski jumper launching off a ski track at a horizontal speed and landing on an inclined surface. The discussion centers around optimizing the launch angle to maximize the distance traveled on the incline, which is defined by a specific slope. Participants are analyzing the equations of motion and the relationships between the variables involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the meaning of the launch angle in relation to the x-axis and the incline. There are attempts to manipulate equations to eliminate time and maximize distance in terms of the angle. Some participants question the dimensional consistency of the derived equations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on each other's reasoning and calculations. There is an emphasis on checking for algebraic errors and dimensional consistency, suggesting a productive exploration of the problem. No consensus has been reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information they can use or the methods they can apply. The specific values and relationships in the problem are being scrutinized for accuracy.

Bdhillon1994
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A ski jumper leaves the ski track moving in the horizontal direction with a speed of 25.0 m/s as shown in Figure 4.14. The landing incline below her falls off with a slope of 35.0°. Where does she land on the incline? I've attached an image of the problem, my work is below it.
RN8sQ5y.png

yzjFy3T.png

Homework Equations


xf = (Vicos(theta))t = dcos(phi)
yf = (Visin(theta)t) - (0.5)gt^2 = -dsin(phi)

The Attempt at a Solution


I understand and reached the solution of part a), but I am struggling with part b). It says to eliminate time "t" and differentiate and maximize "d" in terms of angle "theta".

this is the furthest I've gotten:

xf = (Vicos(theta))t

t = xf/(Vicos(theta))

yf = (Visin(theta))t - (0.5)gt^2

plugging in t = xf/(Vicos(theta))

yf = (Visin(theta))(xf/(Vicos(theta)) - (0.5)g(xf/(Vicos(theta))^2
= xftan(theta) - (0.5)g(xf/(vicos(theta))^2
= xftan(theta) - xf^2(1/(2gVi^2cos^2(theta))

(factoring out and dividing by xf)

yf/xf = tan(theta) - xf/(2gVi^2cos^2(theta))

-dsin(phi)/(dcos(phi)) = tan(theta) - xf/(2gVi^2cos^2(theta))

-tan(phi) = tan(theta) - xf/(2gVi^2cos^2(theta))

I don't know what to do after this step. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bdhillon1994 said:
xf = (Vicos(theta))t
What does theta represent in that equation? Think carefully.
 
haruspex said:
What does theta represent in that equation? Think carefully.
Hi Haruspex, I believe it represents the launch angle
 
Bdhillon1994 said:
Hi Haruspex, I believe it represents the launch angle
Yes, but angle to what?

Edit: sorry, forget it... may have misread something. More soon...
 
haruspex said:
Yes, but angle to what?

Edit: sorry, forget it... may have misread something. More soon...
The angle in respect to the x-axis? Is it because it's initially at zero? Because φ is 35 degrees ... ?
 
haruspex said:
Yes, but angle to what?

Edit: sorry, forget it... may have misread something. More soon...
Oh okay, all good. Thanks for replying to my thread, though!
 
Bdhillon1994 said:
= xftan(theta) - (0.5)g(xf/(vicos(theta))^2
= xftan(theta) - xf^2(1/(2gVi^2cos^2(theta))
Check that step. The second line is dimensionally inconsistent.
(This is a useful technique for finding algebraic errors in physics. Check whether the final equation makes sense dimensionally. If it doesn't, do a 'binary chop' to see where it went wrong.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bdhillon1994
haruspex said:
Check that step. The second line is dimensionally inconsistent.
(This is a useful technique for finding algebraic errors in physics. Check whether the final equation makes sense dimensionally. If it doesn't, do a 'binary chop' to see where it went wrong.)
Okay thanks, I'll review my work once I'm home. Also, what do you mean by "binary chop"?
 
Bdhillon1994 said:
Okay thanks, I'll review my work once I'm home. Also, what do you mean by "binary chop"?
Say you did eight operations on an equation in sequence. The first equation passes some check (such as dimensional consistency) but the ninth doesn't. so check the one in the middle. If that's ok, check the one half way from there to the end, etc.
You might find this useful: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/frequently-made-errors-equation-handling
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bdhillon1994
  • #10

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
40
Views
8K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
11K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
10K
Replies
4
Views
2K