The expected value of the square of the sample mean?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The expected value of the square of the sample mean is accurately represented by the equation E(X-bar^2) = (σ^2)/n + μ^2. This equation derives from the relationship between the variance and the expected value of a random variable, specifically using the formula Var(Y) = E(Y^2) - (E(Y))^2. The discussion clarifies that the correct interpretation requires squaring the mean (μ^2) rather than leaving it as μ. Participants in the forum successfully corrected the initial misunderstanding regarding the dimensions of the variables involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of statistical concepts such as expected value and variance.
  • Familiarity with random variables and their properties.
  • Knowledge of summation notation and its application in statistics.
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical derivations and proofs.
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of the variance formula Var(Y) = E(Y^2) - (E(Y))^2.
  • Study the properties of independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) random variables.
  • Explore the implications of the Central Limit Theorem on sample means.
  • Learn about the application of the Law of Large Numbers in statistical analysis.
USEFUL FOR

Students in statistics, data analysts, and researchers interested in understanding the properties of sample means and their expected values.

pandaBee
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In my notes I keep stumbling upon this equation:

Equation 1: E(X-bar^2) = (σ^2)/n + μ^2

I was wondering why the above equation is true and how it is derived.

The Attempt at a Solution


E(X-bar^2)

##Summations are from i/j=1 to n

= E[(Σx_i/n)^2)]

= E[(Σx_i/n)(Σx_j/n)]

=(1/n^2)E[(Σx_i)(Σx_j)]

=(1/n^2)ΣΣE(x_i*x_j)

=E(x_1^2) + E( x_2^2 + ... + E(x_n^2)
+ E(x_1*x_2) + E(x_1*x_3) + ... : Equation 2

I'm stuck at this point. Could someone show me how you get to Equation 1 from Equation 2? Assuming that my derivation to Equation 2 is correct.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
pandaBee said:

Homework Statement


In my notes I keep stumbling upon this equation:

Equation 1: E(X-bar^2) = (σ^2)/n + μ

I was wondering why the above equation is true and how it is derived.

The Attempt at a Solution


E(X-bar^2)

##Summations are from i/j=1 to n

= E[(Σx_i/n)^2)]

= E[(Σx_i/n)(Σx_j/n)]

=(1/n^2)E[(Σx_i)(Σx_j)]

=(1/n^2)ΣΣE(x_i*x_j)

=E(x_1^2) + E( x_2^2 + ... + E(x_n^2)
+ E(x_1*x_2) + E(x_1*x_3) + ... : Equation 2

I'm stuck at this point. Could someone show me how you get to Equation 1 from Equation 2? Assuming that my derivation to Equation 2 is correct.

If you mean
E \overline{X}^2 = \frac{\sigma^2}{n} + \mu
then that cannot possibly be right! For one thing, the "dimensions" don't match. For example, if ##X## is measured in meters, then ##\sigma^2## is measured in ##\text{meters}^2##, while ##\mu## is in meters.

The easiest approach is to recognize that the mean square and variance of any random variable ##Y## are connected by the equation
\text{Var}(Y) = E(Y^2) - (E Y)^2, \; \text{or} \; E(Y^2) = \text{Var}(Y) + (EY)^2

Apply this to ##Y = \bar{X} = \sum X_i / n##. Assuming the ##X_i## are independent and identically distributed there are easy and well-known formulas for ##EY## and ##\text{Var} (Y)## in terms of ##\mu##, ##\sigma## and ##n##. That will tell you the value of ##E \overline{X}^2##.

On the other hand, if you meant that you want to know
E \overline{X^2} = E \sum X_i^2 / n,
then you have a different set of formulas to use. However, you can approach it again using the relationship between mean square and variance.
 
Last edited:
pandaBee said:

Homework Statement


In my notes I keep stumbling upon this equation:

Equation 1: E(X-bar^2) = (σ^2)/n + μ

I was wondering why the above equation is true and how it is derived.

I think your Equation 1 may contain a slight error, as Ray pointed out

I think the correct equation is E(x-bar)2 = (σ2 / n) + μ2
 
Yes, you are both correct, the correct equation was actually

Equation 1: E(X-bar^2) = (σ^2)/n + μ^2
The mu had to be squared.

In fact, I can see that I have made a huge blunder in how I was looking at this problem. Thank you both for the insight!
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K