Probability that X1=0 given that N=1

  • Thread starter Thread starter DottZakapa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the conditional probability of a random variable, specifically the probability that \(X_1=0\) given that \(N=1\), where \(N\) is defined as the number of independent random variables \(X_1, X_2, X_3\) that assume the value \(0\). The random variables can take values of \(1\), \(0\), or \(-1\) with specified probabilities.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of the definition of \(N\) and question the scenarios where \(X_1=0\) and the other variables are non-zero. There is discussion on whether to apply Bayes' theorem and the implications of different approaches to calculating probabilities.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively discussing various interpretations of the problem and the calculations involved. Some have offered insights into potential errors in reasoning or calculations, while others are clarifying the definitions and relationships between the variables. There is a recognition of differing methods to arrive at the same result, and some participants are beginning to reach clarity on the calculations.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of potential typos in calculations and the need to consider all combinations of the random variables when determining probabilities. The discussion reflects uncertainty regarding the correct application of probability rules and the assumptions underlying the problem.

DottZakapa
Messages
239
Reaction score
17
Homework Statement
Given ##X_1,X_2,X_3## three independent random variables that can assume values 1 ,0 ,-1 with probabilities ##\frac 1 4 ,\frac 1 2 ,\frac 1 4 ##. Let ##S=X_1,X_2,X_3## and let N be the number of##X_i## assuming value ##0##
Relevant Equations
Probability
Given ##X_1,X_2,X_3## three independent random variables that can assume values 1 ,0 ,-1 with probabilities ##\frac 1 4 ,\frac 1 2 ,\frac 1 4 ##. Let ##S=X_1,X_2,X_3## and let N be the number of##X_i## assuming value ##0##.

Knowing that N=1 i have to find what os the probability of ##X_1=0##, that is:

##P \left[ X_1=0 | N=1 \right]= ##

##P \left[ N=1 \right]= \binom 3 1 * \frac 1 2 *\left(\frac 1 2 \right)^2 ##

so i can do
##P \left[ X_1=0 | N=1 \right]=\frac {P \left[ X_1=0 \right] P \left[ N=1 | X_1=0 \right]} {P \left[ N=1 \right]}##

now comes the question
in ##P \left[ N=1 | X_1=0 \right]## starts counting ignoring that ##X_1 = 0## so in order to have N=1 there is an other random variable that is equal to 0 and one that is not, ##X_1=0, X_2=0, X_3 \neq 0##
or
only ##X_1=0## and the others are not equal zero?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
DottZakapa said:
let N be the number of##X_i## assuming value ##0##.

only ##X_1=0## and the others are not equal zero?

Based on the definition of ## N ## that you provided, I think your latter scenario is correct (i.e. ## X_1 = 0 ## and the other two are non-zero)

In terms of the solving, I think Bayes' might overcomplicate it? I think it might be quicker to do the calculation w/o Bayes'. (EDIT: don't change the way you solve it just based on my comment because both methods should yield the same answer - perhaps you use another method as a checking mechanism)
 
Master1022 said:
Based on the definition of N that you provided, I think your latter scenario is correct (i.e. X1=0 and the other two are non-zero)

In terms of the solving, I think Bayes' might overcomplicate it? I think it might be quicker to do the calculation w/o Bayes'. (EDIT: don't change the way you solve it just based on my comment because both methods should yield the same answer - perhaps you use another method as a checking mechanism)

if## X1=0## and the other two are non-zero then the result does not coincide with the result (according to the prof correction) which is 1/3.

My solution is :
##P \left[ X_1=0 | N=1 \right]=\frac {P \left[ X_1=0 \right] P \left[ N=1 | X_1=0 \right]} {P \left[ N=1 \right]}=## ##\frac {\frac 1 2 \frac 1 4 \frac 1 4 }{\binom 3 1 \frac 1 2 \left(\frac 1 2 \right)^2}##

while the professor did as follows :
##\frac {\frac 1 2 \frac 1 2 \frac 1 4 }{\binom 3 1 \frac 1 2 \left(\frac 1 2 \right)^2}##

he considered also the second random variable as = to zero and i don't understand why
 
DottZakapa said:
if## X1=0## and the other two are non-zero then the result does not coincide with the result (according to the prof correction) which is 1/3.

My solution is :
##P \left[ X_1=0 | N=1 \right]=\frac {P \left[ X_1=0 \right] P \left[ N=1 | X_1=0 \right]} {P \left[ N=1 \right]}=## ##\frac {\frac 1 2 \frac 1 4 \frac 1 4 }{\binom 3 1 \frac 1 2 \left(\frac 1 2 \right)^2}##

can you explain why the numerator is ## \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{4} \cdot \frac{1}{4} ## instead of ## \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{2} ## as the probability of being non-zero is 1/2?

DottZakapa said:
##\frac {\frac 1 2 \frac 1 2 \frac 1 4 }{\binom 3 1 \frac 1 2 \left(\frac 1 2 \right)^2}##

he considered also the second random variable as = to zero and i don't understand why

I am not sure why he considered a second variable as 0, but will give that more thought afterwards as well. Is it potentially a typo as that expression doesn't = 1/3? I think he meant the numerator to be ## ( \frac{1}{2} )^3 ##

I thought the solution would follow:
$$ = \frac{ P(X_1 = 0) P(X_2 \neq 0) P(X_3 \neq 0) }{ P(X_1 = 0) P(X_2 \neq 0) P(X_3 \neq 0) + P(X_1 \neq 0) P(X_2 = 0) P(X_3 \neq 0) + P(X_1 \neq 0) P(X_2 \neq 0) P(X_3 = 0)} $$
which yields ## 1/3 ## as expected
 
DottZakapa said:
My solution is :
##P \left[ X_1=0 | N=1 \right]=\frac {P \left[ X_1=0 \right] P \left[ N=1 | X_1=0 \right]} {P \left[ N=1 \right]}=## ##\frac {\frac 1 2 \frac 1 4 \frac 1 4 }{\binom 3 1 \frac 1 2 \left(\frac 1 2 \right)^2}##

I think there is an error with you numerator. If you list out all the combinations of ## X_1 ##, ## X_2 ##, and ## X_3 ## where ## X_1 = 0 ##, there will be 9 combinations. However, not all combinations are equiprobable (as ## P(X_i = \pm 1) = 1/4 ## each). When I calculated ## P(N = 1 | X_1 = 0) ##, those are the cases where only ## X_1 ## is 0, then I get ## 1/4 ## so your numerator would be ## \frac{1}{4} \cdot \frac{1}{2} = \frac{1}{8} ## which will yield 1/3
 
i am getting lost
so
tho probability of being 0 is 1/2
probability of being 1 or -1 is 1/4
then, for what concerns
##P \left[ N=1 | X_1=0 \right]## = ##P(X_1=0,X_2=1,X_3=1)+P(X_1=0,X_2=1,X_3=-1)+##
##P(X_1=0,X_2=-1,X_3=1)+P(X_1=0,X_2=-1,X_3=-1)+P(X_1=0,X_2=-1,X_3=-1)##
in which i am taking into account all possible combinations where ##X_1=0##.
so it becomes
##\left(\frac 1 2 \frac 1 4 \frac 1 4 \right)*4##
this solves
##P \left[ N=1 | X_1=0 \right]##
but in front of it there also is
##P \left[ X_1=0 \right] ## that is equal to ##\frac 1 2##
 
DottZakapa said:
tho probability of being 0 is 1/2
probability of being 1 or -1 is 1/4
agree

DottZakapa said:
but in front of it there also is
##P \left[ X_1=0 \right] ## that is equal to ##\frac 1 2##
agreed

DottZakapa said:
##P \left[ N=1 | X_1=0 \right]## = ##P(X_1=0,X_2=1,X_3=1)+P(X_1=0,X_2=1,X_3=-1)+##
##P(X_1=0,X_2=-1,X_3=1)+P(X_1=0,X_2=-1,X_3=-1)+P(X_1=0,X_2=-1,X_3=-1)##
in which i am taking into account all possible combinations where ##X_1=0##.
so it becomes
##\left(\frac 1 2 \frac 1 4 \frac 1 4 \right)*4##
this solves
##P \left[ N=1 | X_1=0 \right]##
I believe this is calculating ## P(N = 1 \cap X_1 = 0) ## rather than ## P \left[ N=1 | X_1=0 \right] ##. You need to divide by ## P(X_1 = 0) ## to get
$$ P \left[ N=1 | X_1=0 \right] = \frac{4 \cdot \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{4} \cdot \frac{1}{4}}{1/2} = 1/4 $$
Then when you include the extra factor of 1/2 that you mentioned you will get 1/8

Does that make more sense. If not, I think listing out all 9 combinations and finding the probability of each will help calculate this term
 
Master1022 said:
When I calculated ## P(N = 1 | X_1 = 0) ##, those are the cases where only ## X_1 ## is 0,
Apologies, I can see how this may have been misleading. What I meant here was that I listed out all the combinations where ## X_1 = 0 ## and found ## P(N = 1 | X_1 = 0) ## by doing:
sum of probabilities where ONLY ## X_1 = 0 ## / sum of probabilities of those 9 combinations
 
Master1022 said:
## \frac{4 * \frac{1}{2} * \frac{1}{4} * \frac{1}{4}}{1/2} = 1/4 ##

ok ok, now its all clear. all works.
thank you.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Master1022
  • #10
Master1022 said:
Apologies, I can see how this may have been misleading. What I meant here was that I listed out all the combinations where ## X_1 = 0 ## and found ## P(N = 1 | X_1 = 0) ## by doing:
sum of probabilities where ONLY ## X_1 = 0 ## / sum of probabilities of those 9 combinations
yes i understood that, and being also multiplied by ##P(X_1 = 0)## i remove from the other probability (by dividing because already taken into account ).
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K