A The force from the energy gradient

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the interpretation of gradient energy in classical field theory, specifically identifying the term E as elastic potential energy. It questions whether the associated force F can be expressed as -∂xφ, derived from the energy term. The conversation clarifies that changing the coefficient from 1/2 to 2 affects the force calculation, as the force is not scale invariant. It emphasizes that the factor in the energy term cannot be ignored, as it directly impacts the force's definition. Understanding the relationship between energy and force is crucial for accurate physical interpretations.
user1139
Messages
71
Reaction score
8
TL;DR Summary
Please see below
From this post-gradient energy in classical field theory, one identifies the term ##E\equiv\frac{1}{2}\left(\partial_x\phi\right)^2## as the gradient energy which can be interpreted as elastic potential energy.

Can one then say that $$F\equiv -\frac{\partial E}{\partial\left(\partial_x\phi\right)}=-\partial_x\phi$$
is the associated force?

In addition, if one has the factor as ##2## instead of ##\frac{1}{2}##, can one just ignore the factor of ##4## and claim that the associated force is ##-\partial_x\phi## since the factor is just a scaling?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No and no. The second no is obvious; the force is not scale invariant, so the scale matters. To understand the first no, ask yourself: the force on what?
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
I passed a motorcycle on the highway going the opposite direction. I know I was doing 125/km/h. I estimated that the frequency of his motor dropped by an entire octave, so that's a doubling of the wavelength. My intuition is telling me that's extremely unlikely. I can't actually calculate how fast he was going with just that information, can I? It seems to me, I have to know the absolute frequency of one of those tones, either shifted up or down or unshifted, yes? I tried to mimic the...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
900
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Back
Top