A The force from the energy gradient

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the interpretation of gradient energy in classical field theory, specifically identifying the term E as elastic potential energy. It questions whether the associated force F can be expressed as -∂xφ, derived from the energy term. The conversation clarifies that changing the coefficient from 1/2 to 2 affects the force calculation, as the force is not scale invariant. It emphasizes that the factor in the energy term cannot be ignored, as it directly impacts the force's definition. Understanding the relationship between energy and force is crucial for accurate physical interpretations.
user1139
Messages
71
Reaction score
8
TL;DR
Please see below
From this post-gradient energy in classical field theory, one identifies the term ##E\equiv\frac{1}{2}\left(\partial_x\phi\right)^2## as the gradient energy which can be interpreted as elastic potential energy.

Can one then say that $$F\equiv -\frac{\partial E}{\partial\left(\partial_x\phi\right)}=-\partial_x\phi$$
is the associated force?

In addition, if one has the factor as ##2## instead of ##\frac{1}{2}##, can one just ignore the factor of ##4## and claim that the associated force is ##-\partial_x\phi## since the factor is just a scaling?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No and no. The second no is obvious; the force is not scale invariant, so the scale matters. To understand the first no, ask yourself: the force on what?
 
Thread 'The rocket equation, one more time'
I already posted a similar thread a while ago, but this time I want to focus exclusively on one single point that is still not clear to me. I just came across this problem again in Modern Classical Mechanics by Helliwell and Sahakian. Their setup is exactly identical to the one that Taylor uses in Classical Mechanics: a rocket has mass m and velocity v at time t. At time ##t+\Delta t## it has (according to the textbooks) velocity ##v + \Delta v## and mass ##m+\Delta m##. Why not ##m -...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
364
Replies
1
Views
263
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
938
Replies
0
Views
802
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K