The general public is scientifically illiterate!

  • Thread starter aychamo
  • Start date
  • #1
374
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

I read the tech blog Gizmodo. They recently posted a story about Stephen Hawking.

Read through the comments:
http://gizmodo.com/5628375/stephen-hawking-big-bangs-happen

It is amazing how many people have no concept of science. Nobody seems to even have a concept of what a theory or law is.

Example:

The problem with scientists is that they want their theories to become facts and laws... they need to know their place. We are observers, pontificates, predictors, and explanation givers; we do not create laws with our mind, they exist out side of us, before us and after us.
The rest of the comments there are absolutely atrocious. People giving their ideas of big bang, etc. It is truly hilarious, and at the same time will make you feel depressed.

......
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Vanadium 50
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
2019 Award
24,551
7,442
Yes, the general public is scientifically illiterate. How do you plan on improving things?
 
  • #3
phyzguy
Science Advisor
4,549
1,484
Yes, the general public is scientifically illiterate. How do you plan on improving things?
Well said. I think those of us on this forum, who generally understand science better than most, have an obligation to educate people wherever we can
 
  • #4
stewartcs
Science Advisor
2,177
3
Hell...some of the engineers I work with are scientifically illiterate! LOL!

CS
 
  • #5
18
1
And BAM!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0uNwJthqFTo
 
  • #6
461
8
THAT IS WILD Wild it's wild...:bugeye:
 
  • #7
Forget scientifically illiterate, plenty of them are functionally illiterate... *sigh*
 
  • #8
38
1
I read the tech blog Gizmodo. They recently posted a story about Stephen Hawking.

Read through the comments:
http://gizmodo.com/5628375/stephen-hawking-big-bangs-happen

It is amazing how many people have no concept of science. Nobody seems to even have a concept of what a theory or law is.

Example:



The rest of the comments there are absolutely atrocious. People giving their ideas of big bang, etc. It is truly hilarious, and at the same time will make you feel depressed.

......
Reading internet comments in general (not including this forum) will give you a very depressing picture of humanity. Try reading the comments to any AOL news story:(
 
  • #9
2,985
15
Youtube comments for the win!
 
  • #10
905
4
I agree that the general public is generally stupid. But I don't know if this is an instance of that foolishness. The comment you quoted is technically a correct description of how science works (if patently obvious), except for the author's misuse of the word "theory." However, here I think the author was using that word in the colloquial sense, i.e. as it would be used in a murder investigation. Indeed, it's highly probable that Dr. Hawking worded this statement in such a way as to stir controversy, so it's not surprising that we've got responses like this.

Besides, wouldn't it be more fun to quote the responses by the religious extremists? Hawking usually manages to stir them up.
 
  • #11
diazona
Homework Helper
2,175
6
Hell...some of the engineers I work with are scientifically illiterate! LOL!
After some of the papers I've been reading lately, I think I'm scientifically illiterate...
 
  • #12
2,985
15
More to the point - it's true that the general public is scientifically illiterate (I would not use the word stupid), the question is what is important for them to know. Understanding how technology works, while nice, doesn't really matter. I don't care how my ipod works, I just want it to work and do cool stuff. What does matter is that I understand the fundamentals of science. Reason by logic, how to interpret and judge data presented to me, credibility of sources of information, and the ability to make reasonable interpolation and/or extrapolations. Definitional terms, like theory, law, hypothesis, control, etc, should also be taught.
 
  • #13
180
1
"Something bounced off the sun."

Wow (smacks forehead).
 
  • #14
MATLABdude
Science Advisor
1,655
4
John Gabriel's Greater Internet F***wad Theory (featuring NSFW, but absolutely true, language):
http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2004/3/19/

In theory, the anonymity (maybe like beer) lets you say what you really think. In practice, the low SNR probably means that people troll in order to get noticed.

EDIT: More pertinent to the thread at hand, it doesn't help that there's a PR campaign to make science just another "brand" of information (and possibly even worse, one with a Liberal bias, to drag science into the whole culture wars) with total subjectivity and opinions that, like Stephen Colbert says, come straight from the gut (rather than more nuanced differences that arise from prior results, publications, and yes, even occasionally from the gut--as shaped by prior experience).

To again take this OT (and possibly into the Politics subforum), I'm surprised that there isn't some institution (especially some of the new Evangelical colleges like Bob Jones or Oral Roberts) offering "Conservative Arts" degree given how much of a pejorative the word "Liberal" has become these days.
 
Last edited:
  • #15
4,465
72
The problem with scientists is that they want their theories to become facts and laws..
I could not locate that quote and it's preposterous of course, that's no science. However there are plenty of people who want their 'theories' to become facts and laws, several having PhD's even. A bit hard for the general public to distinghuish them from scientists.

It is a capital mistake to theorize before you have all the evidence. It biases the judgment...Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories.

Sherlock Holmes :smile:
 
  • #16
Pythagorean
Gold Member
4,193
256
the scientific are publically illiterate!
 
  • #17
alt
Gold Member
202
0
the scientific are publically illiterate!
A generalisation, but you make the point well.
 
  • #18
alt
Gold Member
202
0
The general public is scientifically illiterate!

An economist / banker could equally say the general public is financially illiterate.

A composer of music can equally say the general public is musically illiterate.

Sure, the general public is scientifically illiterate - though I fail to see your point.

Are you endeavouring to aggrandise scientists thereof ?
 
  • #20
The general public is scientifically illiterate!

An economist / banker could equally say the general public is financially illiterate.

A composer of music can equally say the general public is musically illiterate.

Sure, the general public is scientifically illiterate - though I fail to see your point.

Are you endeavouring to aggrandise scientists thereof ?
Do you believe that the average physicist can learn how to be a CPA? Do you believe the average CPA can become a physicist? I think this a bit "quaternion"-ish... it doesn't yield the same result in both directions. Science is the means by which we understand the world around us, whereas say, finance, is a necessity which is purely invented for the sake of smooth commerce.

It really comes down to those questions: A can -> B, but B cannot -> A. How many scientists enjoy classical music...? Many, especially those with an appreciation of mathematics. How many composers can or do appreciate the science of their own instruments? Some, but not many.
 
  • #21
119
2
I think the problem is that the general public are not educated to value logical thinking and don't have the desire to understand how everything works, why the world is as it is... they are content to just get on with their lives and enjoy the physical pleasures... I guess its not a problem really, just matter of opinion...
but science is so important! thats why it is a problem not more people appreciate it! we NEED to understand our world! or we will end up destroying it!
 
  • #22
119
2
I do feel like science kind of barricades itself behind jargon and difficult theories... makes it much less easy for everyone to understand. but that is the nature of it I guess... hundreds of years of knowledge built up and inter-linked - takes a while to understand it! so more education is needed on the importance of science and on value of logical thinking. with these two, everyone should want to and be able to understand science.
 
  • #23
Chi Meson
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
1,789
10
The general public is scientifically illiterate!

An economist / banker could equally say the general public is financially illiterate.

A composer of music can equally say the general public is musically illiterate.

Sure, the general public is scientifically illiterate - though I fail to see your point.

Are you endeavouring to aggrandise scientists thereof ?
One difference I see in this argument is this: a science PhD would not pretend to automatically know the intricacies of finance, nor would they pretend to be an expert in music theory, etc, etc, etc.

But too many people mistake their general feelings and mistaken intuition for valid scientific arguments. Too many senators, for certain.
 
  • #24
280
0
I tend to ignore those opinions, but I think what Hawking said was totally illogical.
If he could actually prove the existence of everything, then he can claim that god does not exists.

I have to agree with Newton and Einstein that science and religion can coexist.
I find Hawking quite strange in the past few months.
 
  • #25
lisab
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
1,887
616
I tend to ignore those opinions, but I think what Hawking said was totally illogical.
If he could actually prove the existence of everything, then he can claim that god does not exists.

I have to agree with Newton and Einstein that science and religion can coexist.
I find Hawking quite strange in the past few months.
Hmm, interesting point. He did make that statement about aliens a few months ago (that we should not be looking for them). It was sort of odd, I thought, but I figured the media had taken it out of context (haha...imagine that, the media taking something a scientist says out of context, haha....sigh).
 

Related Threads on The general public is scientifically illiterate!

  • Last Post
7
Replies
156
Views
14K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
583
  • Last Post
2
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Top