The general public is scientifically illiterate

  • Thread starter Thread starter aychamo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    General
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the perceived scientific illiteracy of the general public, exploring the implications of this issue and potential ways to address it. Participants reference various sources, including comments from a tech blog, and share personal observations about the understanding of science among different groups, including engineers and the general populace.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express concern about the lack of understanding of scientific concepts among the general public, citing specific examples from online comments.
  • There is a suggestion that those with a better grasp of science have a responsibility to educate others.
  • Some participants argue that while the public may be scientifically illiterate, it is important to determine what knowledge is essential for them to possess.
  • One participant notes that the misuse of scientific terminology contributes to misunderstandings.
  • Concerns are raised about the accessibility of science due to jargon and complex theories, suggesting that education should focus on logical thinking and the importance of science.
  • Some participants draw parallels between scientific illiteracy and other forms of illiteracy, such as financial or musical illiteracy.
  • There are differing views on whether the general public's lack of scientific knowledge is a problem or simply a matter of personal choice and priorities.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the public is scientifically illiterate, but there is no consensus on the implications of this or the best methods for improvement. Multiple competing views exist regarding the importance of scientific understanding and the role of education.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the complexity of scientific language and concepts as barriers to understanding, while others emphasize the need for a more fundamental grasp of scientific principles rather than technical details.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to educators, scientists, and individuals involved in public outreach or communication of scientific concepts, as well as those concerned with the general public's understanding of science.

  • #61
Andy said:
Not enough homers though...

On that, we can agree.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
One of my Abstruse Goose favorites. (http://abstrusegoose.com/" )

[PLAIN]http://abstrusegoose.com/strips/ignorance.PNG

Formal link: http://abstrusegoose.com/205"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #63
collinsmark said:
One of my Abstruse Goose favorites. (http://abstrusegoose.com/" )

[PLAIN]http://abstrusegoose.com/strips/ignorance.PNG

Formal link: http://abstrusegoose.com/205"

:smile: I like the "I am become death" reference; it makes the punchline that much sweeter.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #67
lisab said:
That really made me laugh! Then, on second thought...not so much.

I think it's for that very reason that humans are constructed to laugh and cry at the same time. *craughs*
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
8K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
8K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
12K