nismaratwork
- 358
- 0
Andy said:Not enough homers though...
On that, we can agree.
The discussion centers on the perceived scientific illiteracy of the general public, exploring the implications of this issue and potential ways to address it. Participants reference various sources, including comments from a tech blog, and share personal observations about the understanding of science among different groups, including engineers and the general populace.
Participants generally agree that the public is scientifically illiterate, but there is no consensus on the implications of this or the best methods for improvement. Multiple competing views exist regarding the importance of scientific understanding and the role of education.
Some participants highlight the complexity of scientific language and concepts as barriers to understanding, while others emphasize the need for a more fundamental grasp of scientific principles rather than technical details.
This discussion may be of interest to educators, scientists, and individuals involved in public outreach or communication of scientific concepts, as well as those concerned with the general public's understanding of science.
Andy said:Not enough homers though...
collinsmark said:One of my Abstruse Goose favorites. (http://abstrusegoose.com/" )
[PLAIN]http://abstrusegoose.com/strips/ignorance.PNG
Formal link: http://abstrusegoose.com/205"
Vagn said:For some reason I suspect that headlines like this don't exactly promote scientific literacy:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...n-sense-touch-patients-artificial-limbs.html"
Vagn said:For some reason I suspect that headlines like this don't exactly promote scientific literacy:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...n-sense-touch-patients-artificial-limbs.html"
lisab said:That really made me laugh! Then, on second thought...not so much.