The hot-air ballon intersection question.

  • Thread starter Thread starter aeabdo11
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Intersection
AI Thread Summary
The problem involves a hot-air balloon rising at 2.2 m/s and a camera tossed upward at 12 m/s from a point 2.5 m below the balloon. The equations for the heights of both the balloon and the camera were set equal to find the time when they meet. Calculations yielded a height of approximately 3.16 m, but the online homework system flagged the answer as incorrect, suggesting a rounding error or significant figure issue. The confusion arises around significant figures, with some suggesting the answer should be 3.2 for two significant figures, yet this also resulted in an incorrect submission. The discussion highlights the challenge of accurately interpreting significant figures in the context of the problem.
aeabdo11
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I am close to positive I am going at this problem the correct way, but there seems to be some error somewhere. This problem is from online homework.

Homework Statement



A hot-air balloon has just lifted off and is rising at the constant rate of 2.2 m/s. Suddenly one of the passengers realizes she has left her camera on the ground. A friend picks it up and tosses it straight upward with an initial speed of 12 m/s.

If the passenger is 2.5 m above her friend when the camera is tossed, how high is she when the camera reaches her?
Express your answer using two significant figures.

Homework Equations



X=Xo+Vot+(.5)at^2

The Attempt at a Solution



So I know I need to set the two equations equal and solve for time.

2.5+2.2t=12t-(.5)(9.81)t^2

Solving for t (using quad. equation) gives solutions as t=.3 , t= 1.7

Now I plug the time into the first equation and solve for x for the hot-air balloon at .3 seconds.

2.5+2.2(.3) = 3.16 m

As should be the case, I get the same answer when figuring x for the camera:

12(.3)-(.5)(9.81)(.3)^2= 3.158 m

When I plug this answer into the online homework it says, "Not quite. Check through your calculations; you may have made a rounding error or used the wrong number of significant figures."

I have tried the following answers, none of which work: 3.1, 3.15, 3.2

PLEASE HELP ME FIND WHAT I'M MISSING PLEASE!

Thanks a lot.
-Anthony
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your equation is correct. Since the online homework website is saying that you're having some kind of rounding error, I went on checking the values. It appears that the actual value should be approximately 3.16045. Try to input 3.16 as an answer there.
 
I would have already tried that answer but the question asks for the answer to be in only two significant figures. "3.16" is three figures is it not (this significant figure thing is a bit confusing)?
 
aeabdo11 said:
I would have already tried that answer but the question asks for the answer to be in only two significant figures. "3.16" is three figures is it not (this significant figure thing is a bit confusing)?
In case of 'two significant figures', the answer should definitely be 3.2
 
Yeah Iv'e tried it...says incorrect.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Back
Top