Proving Summation with Kronecker Delta and Levi-Civita

  • Thread starter Thread starter newton1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Delta
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the summation identity SUM(k) [E(ijk)E(lmk)] = d(il)d(jm) - d(im)d(jl), where "d" represents the Kronecker delta and "E" denotes the Levi-Civita permutation symbol. The participants clarify the definitions of the Kronecker delta and the Levi-Civita symbol, emphasizing their roles in the proof. The proof involves expanding the permutation symbols and applying the distributive property to simplify the summation, ultimately leading to the established identity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Kronecker delta notation (d(ij))
  • Familiarity with Levi-Civita permutation symbol (E(ijk))
  • Basic knowledge of summation notation and properties
  • Experience with tensor algebra and indices
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Kronecker delta in tensor calculus
  • Learn about the applications of Levi-Civita symbol in physics and engineering
  • Explore advanced topics in tensor analysis and their proofs
  • Investigate the role of permutation symbols in multi-dimensional algebra
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers who are working with tensor calculus, particularly those involved in theoretical physics and advanced mathematics.

newton1
Messages
151
Reaction score
0
i need help...:frown:
prove SUM(k) [E(ijk)E(lmk)]= d(il)d(jm) - d(im)d(jl)
where "d" is Kronecker delta symbol and "E" is permutation symbol or
Levi-Civita density
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
A clarification: the Kronecker delta, d(ij), is 1 if i= j, 0 otherwise.

The Levi-Civita permutation symbol, E(ijk) {real notation is "epsilon"), is 1 if ijk is an even permutation of 123, -1 if ijk is an odd permutation of 123, and 0 otherwise. While d(ij) is defined for all dimensions, E(ijk) implies that i, j, and k can only be 1, 2 ,3. For higher "dimensions" we would need more indices.

SUM(k) [E(ijk)E(lmk)]= E(ij1)E(lm1)+ E(ij2)E(lm2)+E(ij3)E(lm3)
 


To prove this summation using Kronecker delta and Levi-Civita, we can start by writing out the sum as:

SUM(k) [E(ijk)E(lmk)]

We can then expand the first permutation symbol using its definition:

E(ijk) = d(ij)k - d(ik)j

Substituting this into the original sum, we get:

SUM(k) [d(ij)k - d(ik)j]E(lmk)

Next, we can expand the second permutation symbol in a similar way:

E(lmk) = d(lm)k - d(lk)m

Substituting this into the sum, we get:

SUM(k) [d(ij)k - d(ik)j] [d(lm)k - d(lk)m]

Using the distributive property, we can expand this sum further:

SUM(k) d(ij)kd(lm)k - SUM(k) d(ij)kd(lk)m - SUM(k) d(ik)jd(lm)k + SUM(k) d(ik)jd(lk)m

Now, let's focus on each term separately. The first term is:

SUM(k) d(ij)kd(lm)k

Since we are summing over k, we can treat d(ij) and d(lm) as constants. This means we can pull them out of the sum:

d(ij)d(lm) SUM(k) k

The sum of k from 1 to n is simply n(n+1)/2. Therefore, this term simplifies to:

d(ij)d(lm) n(n+1)/2

Similarly, for the second term, we have:

SUM(k) d(ij)kd(lk)m

Again, we can pull out d(ij) and d(lk) as constants, leaving us with:

d(ij)d(lk) SUM(k) km

The sum of km from 1 to n is simply n(n+1)/2. Therefore, this term simplifies to:

d(ij)d(lk) n(n+1)/2

For the third term, we have:

SUM(k) d(ik)jd(lm)k

Following the same steps as before, we can pull out d(ik) and d(lm) as constants, leaving us with:

d(ik)d(lm) SUM(k)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K