1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Relation between Levi-civita and Kronecker- delta symbol

  1. May 19, 2017 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    definition of εijk
    εijk=+1 if ijk = (123, 231, 312)
    εijk = −1if ijk = (213, 321, 132) , (1.1.1)
    εijk= 0,otherwise .
    That is,εijk is nonzero only when all three indices are different.

    From the definition in Eq. (1.1.1), show that
    εijkεinm= δjnδkm − δjmδkn , (1.1.4)
    where of course there is an implied sum over the i index in Eq. (1.1.4), but the indices j, k, n,and m are free.

    2. Relevant equations


    3. The attempt at a solution
    By using definition of εijk; I can show that under the values which i,j,k,n,m can take, L.H.S.=R.H.S.

    But is there any other better way to show it?
    Is there a way such that one will start from L.H.S. and reach to R.H.S.?
     
    Last edited: May 19, 2017
  2. jcsd
  3. May 19, 2017 #2

    Orodruin

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    We do not have access to your book so we cannot tell how Eq. (1.1.1) defines the Levi-Civita symbol.
     
  4. May 19, 2017 #3
    I have written the definition.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Relation between Levi-civita and Kronecker- delta symbol
  1. The Kronecker delta (Replies: 1)

  2. Delta Symbol confusion (Replies: 5)

Loading...