Why Are Factors in the Law of Mass Action Multiplied Rather Than Added?

  • Thread starter Thread starter henxan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law Mass
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Law of Mass Action states that the rate of a chemical reaction is proportional to the product of the concentrations of the reactants, raised to the power of their stoichiometric coefficients. This is mathematically represented as R(f) = k(f)[A]^a*[B]^b and R(b) = k(b)[C]^c*[D]^d, where k(f) and k(b) are the forward and backward rate constants, respectively. The multiplication of factors in the equations arises from the probabilistic nature of finding the required moles of reactants simultaneously, akin to calculating the probability of multiple independent events occurring together. This understanding clarifies why concentrations are multiplied rather than added in the context of reaction rates.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of chemical reaction rates
  • Familiarity with stoichiometry
  • Basic knowledge of probability theory
  • Concept of molarity and concentration
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the equilibrium constant (K) in chemical reactions
  • Learn about the implications of reaction kinetics on chemical equilibrium
  • Explore the relationship between concentration and reaction rate using real-world examples
  • Investigate advanced topics in chemical thermodynamics
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, educators, and professionals in the field of chemical engineering or physical chemistry who seek a deeper understanding of reaction dynamics and the Law of Mass Action.

henxan
Messages
46
Reaction score
2
Hi!

I wondered if there is possible to get an explanation of the "Law of mass action." Here is a simple derivation:

eq.1 aA + bB = cC + dD
eq.2 R(f)= k(f)[A]^a*^b
eq.3 R(b)= k(b)[C]^c*[D]^d
eq.4 At equilibrium R(f)=R(b)
eq.5 k(e)=k(f)/f(b)=([C]^c*[D]^d)/([A]^a*^b)

Well, if a=4 and b=3, the left side of eq.1 becomes:
eq.6 {left side}= 4A + 3B
eq.7 {left side}= A + A + A + A + B + B + B

Now (this is probably a pretty stupid question), why is it that all the factors in eq.2-5 are *multiplied* together, and not *added*?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
not stupid. 98% people don't realize what it is and ask the same.
But there's one valid, very valid and very strongly reasonable answer to this.

I give you the explanation, no crap.
Consider 3A + 2B --> Z
fine?

Now, I let the concentration of A be (0.5 moles/liter)
then I 'define' the (0.5) molarity or 'moles per litre', ("Implicity") as follows:
"You have 50% chance to find exactly 1 mole of A in 1 litre of given volume of the solution."

so when you say its 0.3 molars or moles/litre, I say "Its as good as a 30% chance to find exactly one mole of it in 1 litre of given volume of the solution."

And for the reaction to happen you need 3 moles of A to be present, and each of them has a 50% probability to be present (as defined by 'definition') so... its as good as saying you have three coins and you want heads in all of them as the probability to get heads in all of them (possibility of head in each is 1/2 so possibility to get heads at a single time in all of them is 1/2 * 1/2 * 1/2 or (1/2)^3. Because here, you want all of em to be present at the same time and each has 1/2 chance to be present (molarity = 0.5 = 1/2) so... if you want n moles of A its as good as the probability of exactly n moles of A to be present at the same time, and since each has a probability of k to be present (let the molarity of A be 'k' moles per litre) so... to get the probability for all of em to be present you do [k]^n;
but similarly you also need m moles of B at the same time, so (let the molarity of B be 'j' moles per litre, then...) you have probability of exactly m moles of B to be present at the same time = [j]^m

and since you need both A and B
you do [k]^n * [j]^n

get it?
reference: http://www.khanacademy.org/video/keq-intuition--mathy-and-not-necessary-to-progress?playlist=Chemistry
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
894
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K